Cargando…

Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the load to failure and meniscus gapping of longitudinal meniscus repairs with Soft Suture Based all-inside devices and compare them to a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchored device and inside-out repair. METHODS: After IRB review 12 human cadaver knees were dissected leavi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scalisi, Wayne, Solitro, Giovanni, Massey, Patrick, Barton, Shane, Robinson, James, Daily, Drayton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00021
_version_ 1785019148226527232
author Scalisi, Wayne
Solitro, Giovanni
Massey, Patrick
Barton, Shane
Robinson, James
Daily, Drayton
author_facet Scalisi, Wayne
Solitro, Giovanni
Massey, Patrick
Barton, Shane
Robinson, James
Daily, Drayton
author_sort Scalisi, Wayne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the load to failure and meniscus gapping of longitudinal meniscus repairs with Soft Suture Based all-inside devices and compare them to a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchored device and inside-out repair. METHODS: After IRB review 12 human cadaver knees were dissected leaving only the tibia, the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral menisci with roots still attached to the tibia. This yielded 24 menisci total (12 medial, 12 lateral). Posterior horn longitudinal full thickness meniscus tears were simulated with a scapel and 5mm Mersiline tapes were used to load the repair site. Each knee was randomized to one of 4 meniscus repair groups: Fiberstitch, Juggerstitch, FAST-FIX 360(PEEK), and inside-out with Broadband tape meniscus needles. For each meniscus, 2 longitudinal repairs were performed. The specimens were tested with an Instron imposing 20 cycles between 10N and 30N then the tear gap was measured, followed by a distraction to failure phase after imposing a displacement at a rate of 0.5mm/sec. RESULTS: There There were 6 menisci tested in each of the 4 groups. After low-load cyclical loading, the gaps measured were .63mm, 1.1mm, 1.7mm, and 1.2mm for the Juggerstitch, Fiberstitch, FAST-FIX 360, and Inside-out Groups respectively (see figure 2). The failure load was 352N, 301N, 167N, and 189N for the Juggerstitch, Fiberstitch, FAST-FIX 360, and Inside-out (see figure 3). There was less gap formation and higher load to failure for the Juggerstitch over the FAST-FIX 360 (p=.014 and p=.03, respectively). When comparing all other groups there was no significant difference between groups with respect to gapping or failure load. CONCLUSIONS: The Juggerstitch had less gapping at the repair site and a higher failure load than the FAST-FIX 360. The soft suture based All-Inside meniscus repair devices have gapping and failure load comparable or better than traditional repair devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100711662023-04-05 Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis Scalisi, Wayne Solitro, Giovanni Massey, Patrick Barton, Shane Robinson, James Daily, Drayton Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the load to failure and meniscus gapping of longitudinal meniscus repairs with Soft Suture Based all-inside devices and compare them to a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchored device and inside-out repair. METHODS: After IRB review 12 human cadaver knees were dissected leaving only the tibia, the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral menisci with roots still attached to the tibia. This yielded 24 menisci total (12 medial, 12 lateral). Posterior horn longitudinal full thickness meniscus tears were simulated with a scapel and 5mm Mersiline tapes were used to load the repair site. Each knee was randomized to one of 4 meniscus repair groups: Fiberstitch, Juggerstitch, FAST-FIX 360(PEEK), and inside-out with Broadband tape meniscus needles. For each meniscus, 2 longitudinal repairs were performed. The specimens were tested with an Instron imposing 20 cycles between 10N and 30N then the tear gap was measured, followed by a distraction to failure phase after imposing a displacement at a rate of 0.5mm/sec. RESULTS: There There were 6 menisci tested in each of the 4 groups. After low-load cyclical loading, the gaps measured were .63mm, 1.1mm, 1.7mm, and 1.2mm for the Juggerstitch, Fiberstitch, FAST-FIX 360, and Inside-out Groups respectively (see figure 2). The failure load was 352N, 301N, 167N, and 189N for the Juggerstitch, Fiberstitch, FAST-FIX 360, and Inside-out (see figure 3). There was less gap formation and higher load to failure for the Juggerstitch over the FAST-FIX 360 (p=.014 and p=.03, respectively). When comparing all other groups there was no significant difference between groups with respect to gapping or failure load. CONCLUSIONS: The Juggerstitch had less gapping at the repair site and a higher failure load than the FAST-FIX 360. The soft suture based All-Inside meniscus repair devices have gapping and failure load comparable or better than traditional repair devices. SAGE Publications 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10071166/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00021 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Scalisi, Wayne
Solitro, Giovanni
Massey, Patrick
Barton, Shane
Robinson, James
Daily, Drayton
Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis
title Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_full Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_fullStr Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_short Paper 21: All-Inside Soft Suture Anchor Meniscus Repair Devices vs. PEEK Anchor Devices: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_sort paper 21: all-inside soft suture anchor meniscus repair devices vs. peek anchor devices: a biomechanical analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00021
work_keys_str_mv AT scalisiwayne paper21allinsidesoftsutureanchormeniscusrepairdevicesvspeekanchordevicesabiomechanicalanalysis
AT solitrogiovanni paper21allinsidesoftsutureanchormeniscusrepairdevicesvspeekanchordevicesabiomechanicalanalysis
AT masseypatrick paper21allinsidesoftsutureanchormeniscusrepairdevicesvspeekanchordevicesabiomechanicalanalysis
AT bartonshane paper21allinsidesoftsutureanchormeniscusrepairdevicesvspeekanchordevicesabiomechanicalanalysis
AT robinsonjames paper21allinsidesoftsutureanchormeniscusrepairdevicesvspeekanchordevicesabiomechanicalanalysis
AT dailydrayton paper21allinsidesoftsutureanchormeniscusrepairdevicesvspeekanchordevicesabiomechanicalanalysis