Cargando…
Paper 03: Suprascapular Neuropathy: Two Distinct Presentations and Outcomes of Decompression
OBJECTIVES: Suprascapular neuropathy due to nerve compression or tension at the suprascapular notch is an uncommon source of shoulder pain and rotator cuff weakness with recent increased recognition and treatment. Long considered an elusive diagnosis, work-up can be lengthy and patients may experien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071178/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00003 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: Suprascapular neuropathy due to nerve compression or tension at the suprascapular notch is an uncommon source of shoulder pain and rotator cuff weakness with recent increased recognition and treatment. Long considered an elusive diagnosis, work-up can be lengthy and patients may experience treatment delay. We aimed to review presentation patterns and outcomes of arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression in a predominantly young and active military population. METHODS: The surgical databases of two surgeons were queried for patients treated with arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression at the suprascapular notch from 2013 to 2021. Patient data, presentation and workup findings, and outcome measures were collected through review of the electronic medical record. Primary outcome measures were rate of return to active-duty military service, shoulder abduction and external rotation strength, and VAS pain scores. Secondary outcome measures were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified. Average age was 26.6 years and follow-up 17.9 months (4-62 months). There were two distinct primary presentation types in this cohort: the chief complaint was pain in 13 patients (52%) and weakness in 12 (48%). Supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus atrophy was present on MRI in 10/12 patients with weakness and 0/13 with pain. Electromyography was positive in 9/12 with weakness and negative when obtained in 5 patients with pain. Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve injection was performed in 10/13 with pain and provided mean 91% symptom relief. Patients with pain had longer duration of pre-operative symptoms (22.2 [±13.1] vs. 10.3 [±13.6] weeks). Postoperatively, the pain group had significant improvement in VAS scores (6.2 [±1.6] to 1.0 [±0.9]), while the weakness group had significant improvement in abduction and external rotation motor grading (3.7 [±0.7] to 4.7 [±0.4] and 3.3 [±0.8] to 4.4 [±0.6] respectively). Return to duty or sport was 92% at a mean of 14.6 (±9.3) weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In this young, active cohort, suprascapular neuropathy presented with one of two distinct primary presenting complaints: pain or weakness. Given different expected work-up findings, categorizing patients into one of these two groups may be beneficial in effectively diagnosing and treating suprascapular neuropathy. Outcomes after arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release at the suprascapular notch predictably led to successful pain relief and strength improvement in patients presenting with pain and weakness respectively. |
---|