Cargando…

Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, an evidence-based investigation into 21st-century boxing-specific injury rates and types has yet to be performed. PURPOSE: To provide an overview and quantitative synthesis of the incidence rates (IRs) and pathological categorizations of boxing-specific inju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Yunhe, Zhao, Dongmei, Li, Jian, Fu, Weili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127669
_version_ 1785019154463457280
author Mao, Yunhe
Zhao, Dongmei
Li, Jian
Fu, Weili
author_facet Mao, Yunhe
Zhao, Dongmei
Li, Jian
Fu, Weili
author_sort Mao, Yunhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, an evidence-based investigation into 21st-century boxing-specific injury rates and types has yet to be performed. PURPOSE: To provide an overview and quantitative synthesis of the incidence rates (IRs) and pathological categorizations of boxing-specific injuries in the 21st century. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched literature published from January 2000 to November 2021 in PubMed and the Cochrane Library systematically for qualifying epidemiology studies of organized boxing activities across the world. Two independent reviewers completed the literature review, data extraction, and quality assessment. The IRs of injuries per 1000 boxers (IR(N)), per 1000 competition exposures (IR(E)), and per 1000 minutes of competition (IR(C)) or training (IR(T)) were subsequently calculated. Single-arm meta-analyses were performed for the subgroups of different types of boxing. Sample size weighted means were calculated using a random-effects model in all studies with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Out of an initial 9584 articles, 14 studies were included, with most (11/14) having a moderate level of quality. The pooled IR(N) in overall injuries was 223.9 (95% CI, 157.5-290.4), the IR(E) was 233.3 (95% CI, 161.3-305.2), and the IR(C) was 13.0 (95% CI, 8.9-17.1). In professional boxing, the IR(N) (399.8), IR(E) (379.8), and IR(C) (23.9) were all significantly higher than in the amateur and female groups. The IR(E) (76.6 vs 250.6; P < .000) and IR(C) (9.2 vs 15.4; P < .000) in amateur boxing were significantly lower in studies between 2010 and 2019 than in earlier studies. For pathology categorization, the pooled frequencies were 12.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-15.9%) for concussion, 21.4% (95% CI, 14.1%-28.6%) for skin laceration, 30.2% (95% CI, 22.1%-38.2%) for soft tissue contusion, 15.3% (95% CI, 7.7%-22.9%) for sprain and muscle/ligament injury, and 11.4% (95% CI, 2.7%-20.1%) for fracture. CONCLUSION: IRs of injury remain high in professional boxing, although they have decreased in the past 10 years in amateur boxing. Soft tissue contusion was the most common injury type. Better exposure measurements and epidemiologic indicators should be applied in future studies. REGISTRATION: CRD42021289993 (PROSPERO).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100712012023-04-05 Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century Mao, Yunhe Zhao, Dongmei Li, Jian Fu, Weili Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, an evidence-based investigation into 21st-century boxing-specific injury rates and types has yet to be performed. PURPOSE: To provide an overview and quantitative synthesis of the incidence rates (IRs) and pathological categorizations of boxing-specific injuries in the 21st century. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched literature published from January 2000 to November 2021 in PubMed and the Cochrane Library systematically for qualifying epidemiology studies of organized boxing activities across the world. Two independent reviewers completed the literature review, data extraction, and quality assessment. The IRs of injuries per 1000 boxers (IR(N)), per 1000 competition exposures (IR(E)), and per 1000 minutes of competition (IR(C)) or training (IR(T)) were subsequently calculated. Single-arm meta-analyses were performed for the subgroups of different types of boxing. Sample size weighted means were calculated using a random-effects model in all studies with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Out of an initial 9584 articles, 14 studies were included, with most (11/14) having a moderate level of quality. The pooled IR(N) in overall injuries was 223.9 (95% CI, 157.5-290.4), the IR(E) was 233.3 (95% CI, 161.3-305.2), and the IR(C) was 13.0 (95% CI, 8.9-17.1). In professional boxing, the IR(N) (399.8), IR(E) (379.8), and IR(C) (23.9) were all significantly higher than in the amateur and female groups. The IR(E) (76.6 vs 250.6; P < .000) and IR(C) (9.2 vs 15.4; P < .000) in amateur boxing were significantly lower in studies between 2010 and 2019 than in earlier studies. For pathology categorization, the pooled frequencies were 12.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-15.9%) for concussion, 21.4% (95% CI, 14.1%-28.6%) for skin laceration, 30.2% (95% CI, 22.1%-38.2%) for soft tissue contusion, 15.3% (95% CI, 7.7%-22.9%) for sprain and muscle/ligament injury, and 11.4% (95% CI, 2.7%-20.1%) for fracture. CONCLUSION: IRs of injury remain high in professional boxing, although they have decreased in the past 10 years in amateur boxing. Soft tissue contusion was the most common injury type. Better exposure measurements and epidemiologic indicators should be applied in future studies. REGISTRATION: CRD42021289993 (PROSPERO). SAGE Publications 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10071201/ /pubmed/37025124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127669 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Mao, Yunhe
Zhao, Dongmei
Li, Jian
Fu, Weili
Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century
title Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century
title_full Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century
title_fullStr Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century
title_short Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century
title_sort incidence rates and pathology types of boxing-specific injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiology studies in the 21st century
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127669
work_keys_str_mv AT maoyunhe incidenceratesandpathologytypesofboxingspecificinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofepidemiologystudiesinthe21stcentury
AT zhaodongmei incidenceratesandpathologytypesofboxingspecificinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofepidemiologystudiesinthe21stcentury
AT lijian incidenceratesandpathologytypesofboxingspecificinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofepidemiologystudiesinthe21stcentury
AT fuweili incidenceratesandpathologytypesofboxingspecificinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofepidemiologystudiesinthe21stcentury