Cargando…

The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients’ situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rijpstra, Maaike, Kuip, Evelien, Hasselaar, Jeroen, Vissers, Kris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01156-x
_version_ 1785019180678905856
author Rijpstra, Maaike
Kuip, Evelien
Hasselaar, Jeroen
Vissers, Kris
author_facet Rijpstra, Maaike
Kuip, Evelien
Hasselaar, Jeroen
Vissers, Kris
author_sort Rijpstra, Maaike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients’ situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which extent clinical trajectories of PS differ for these COVID patients compared to regular clinical practice of PS. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical practice of PS in patients with COVID versus non-COVID patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from a Dutch tertiary medical centre was performed. Charts of adult patients who died with PS during hospitalisation between March ’20 and January ‘21 were included. RESULTS: During the study period, 73 patients received PS and of those 25 (34%) had a COVID infection. Refractory dyspnoea was reported as primary indication for starting PS in 84% of patients with COVID compared to 33% in the other group (p < 0.001). Median duration of PS was significantly shorter in the COVID group (5.8 vs. 17.1 h, p < 0.01). No differences were found for starting dosages, but median hourly dose of midazolam was higher in the COVID group (4.2 mg/hr vs. 2.4 mg/hr, p < 0.001). Time interval between start PS and first medication adjustments seemed to be shorter in COVID patients (1.5 vs. 2.9 h, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: PS in COVID patients is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration in all phases of the trajectory. What is manifested by earlier dose adjustments and higher hourly doses of midazolam. Timely evaluation of efficacy is recommended in those patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100712682023-04-04 The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review Rijpstra, Maaike Kuip, Evelien Hasselaar, Jeroen Vissers, Kris BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients’ situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which extent clinical trajectories of PS differ for these COVID patients compared to regular clinical practice of PS. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical practice of PS in patients with COVID versus non-COVID patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from a Dutch tertiary medical centre was performed. Charts of adult patients who died with PS during hospitalisation between March ’20 and January ‘21 were included. RESULTS: During the study period, 73 patients received PS and of those 25 (34%) had a COVID infection. Refractory dyspnoea was reported as primary indication for starting PS in 84% of patients with COVID compared to 33% in the other group (p < 0.001). Median duration of PS was significantly shorter in the COVID group (5.8 vs. 17.1 h, p < 0.01). No differences were found for starting dosages, but median hourly dose of midazolam was higher in the COVID group (4.2 mg/hr vs. 2.4 mg/hr, p < 0.001). Time interval between start PS and first medication adjustments seemed to be shorter in COVID patients (1.5 vs. 2.9 h, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: PS in COVID patients is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration in all phases of the trajectory. What is manifested by earlier dose adjustments and higher hourly doses of midazolam. Timely evaluation of efficacy is recommended in those patients. BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10071268/ /pubmed/37013598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01156-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rijpstra, Maaike
Kuip, Evelien
Hasselaar, Jeroen
Vissers, Kris
The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
title The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
title_full The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
title_fullStr The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
title_full_unstemmed The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
title_short The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
title_sort clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from covid-19: a retrospective chart review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01156-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rijpstramaaike theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT kuipevelien theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT hasselaarjeroen theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT visserskris theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT rijpstramaaike clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT kuipevelien clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT hasselaarjeroen clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview
AT visserskris clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview