Cargando…
The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review
BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients’ situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which ext...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01156-x |
_version_ | 1785019180678905856 |
---|---|
author | Rijpstra, Maaike Kuip, Evelien Hasselaar, Jeroen Vissers, Kris |
author_facet | Rijpstra, Maaike Kuip, Evelien Hasselaar, Jeroen Vissers, Kris |
author_sort | Rijpstra, Maaike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients’ situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which extent clinical trajectories of PS differ for these COVID patients compared to regular clinical practice of PS. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical practice of PS in patients with COVID versus non-COVID patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from a Dutch tertiary medical centre was performed. Charts of adult patients who died with PS during hospitalisation between March ’20 and January ‘21 were included. RESULTS: During the study period, 73 patients received PS and of those 25 (34%) had a COVID infection. Refractory dyspnoea was reported as primary indication for starting PS in 84% of patients with COVID compared to 33% in the other group (p < 0.001). Median duration of PS was significantly shorter in the COVID group (5.8 vs. 17.1 h, p < 0.01). No differences were found for starting dosages, but median hourly dose of midazolam was higher in the COVID group (4.2 mg/hr vs. 2.4 mg/hr, p < 0.001). Time interval between start PS and first medication adjustments seemed to be shorter in COVID patients (1.5 vs. 2.9 h, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: PS in COVID patients is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration in all phases of the trajectory. What is manifested by earlier dose adjustments and higher hourly doses of midazolam. Timely evaluation of efficacy is recommended in those patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10071268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100712682023-04-04 The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review Rijpstra, Maaike Kuip, Evelien Hasselaar, Jeroen Vissers, Kris BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients’ situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which extent clinical trajectories of PS differ for these COVID patients compared to regular clinical practice of PS. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical practice of PS in patients with COVID versus non-COVID patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from a Dutch tertiary medical centre was performed. Charts of adult patients who died with PS during hospitalisation between March ’20 and January ‘21 were included. RESULTS: During the study period, 73 patients received PS and of those 25 (34%) had a COVID infection. Refractory dyspnoea was reported as primary indication for starting PS in 84% of patients with COVID compared to 33% in the other group (p < 0.001). Median duration of PS was significantly shorter in the COVID group (5.8 vs. 17.1 h, p < 0.01). No differences were found for starting dosages, but median hourly dose of midazolam was higher in the COVID group (4.2 mg/hr vs. 2.4 mg/hr, p < 0.001). Time interval between start PS and first medication adjustments seemed to be shorter in COVID patients (1.5 vs. 2.9 h, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: PS in COVID patients is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration in all phases of the trajectory. What is manifested by earlier dose adjustments and higher hourly doses of midazolam. Timely evaluation of efficacy is recommended in those patients. BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10071268/ /pubmed/37013598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01156-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rijpstra, Maaike Kuip, Evelien Hasselaar, Jeroen Vissers, Kris The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review |
title | The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review |
title_full | The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review |
title_fullStr | The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review |
title_full_unstemmed | The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review |
title_short | The clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from COVID-19: a retrospective chart review |
title_sort | clinical practice of palliative sedation in patients dying from covid-19: a retrospective chart review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01156-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rijpstramaaike theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT kuipevelien theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT hasselaarjeroen theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT visserskris theclinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT rijpstramaaike clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT kuipevelien clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT hasselaarjeroen clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview AT visserskris clinicalpracticeofpalliativesedationinpatientsdyingfromcovid19aretrospectivechartreview |