Cargando…

Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool

BACKGROUND: Injuries are one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Bystanders at the scene can perform first aid measures before the arrival of health services. The quality of first aid measures likely affects patient outcome. However, scientific evidence on its effect on patient outcome is limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Idland, Siri, Kramer-Johansen, Jo, Bakke, Håkon Kvåle, Hjortdahl, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00811-z
_version_ 1785019238686130176
author Idland, Siri
Kramer-Johansen, Jo
Bakke, Håkon Kvåle
Hjortdahl, Magnus
author_facet Idland, Siri
Kramer-Johansen, Jo
Bakke, Håkon Kvåle
Hjortdahl, Magnus
author_sort Idland, Siri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Injuries are one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Bystanders at the scene can perform first aid measures before the arrival of health services. The quality of first aid measures likely affects patient outcome. However, scientific evidence on its effect on patient outcome is limited. To properly assess bystander first aid quality, measure effect, and facilitate improvement, validated assessment tools are needed. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool. The FAQA tool focuses on first aid measures for injured patients based on the ABC-principle, as assessed by ambulance personnel arriving on scene. METHODS: In phase 1, we drafted an initial version of the FAQA tool for assessment of airway management, control of external bleeding, recovery position and hypothermia prevention. A group of ambulance personnel aided presentation and wording of the tool. In phase 2 we made eight virtual reality (VR) films, each presenting an injury scenario where bystander performed first aid. In phase 3, an expert group discussed until consensus on how the FAQA tool should rate each scenario. Followingly, 19 respondents, all ambulance personnel, rated the eight films with the FAQA tool. We assessed concurrent validity and inter-rater agreement by visual inspection and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance. RESULTS: FAQA-scores by the expert group concurred with ± 1 of the median of the respondents on all first aid measures for all eight films except one case, where a deviation of 2 was seen. The inter-rater agreement was “very good” for three first aid measures, “good” for one, and “moderate” for the scoring of overall quality on first aid measures. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that it is feasible and acceptable for ambulance personnel to collect information on bystander first aid with the FAQA tool and will be of importance for future research on bystander first aid for injured patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00811-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100716552023-04-05 Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool Idland, Siri Kramer-Johansen, Jo Bakke, Håkon Kvåle Hjortdahl, Magnus BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Injuries are one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Bystanders at the scene can perform first aid measures before the arrival of health services. The quality of first aid measures likely affects patient outcome. However, scientific evidence on its effect on patient outcome is limited. To properly assess bystander first aid quality, measure effect, and facilitate improvement, validated assessment tools are needed. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool. The FAQA tool focuses on first aid measures for injured patients based on the ABC-principle, as assessed by ambulance personnel arriving on scene. METHODS: In phase 1, we drafted an initial version of the FAQA tool for assessment of airway management, control of external bleeding, recovery position and hypothermia prevention. A group of ambulance personnel aided presentation and wording of the tool. In phase 2 we made eight virtual reality (VR) films, each presenting an injury scenario where bystander performed first aid. In phase 3, an expert group discussed until consensus on how the FAQA tool should rate each scenario. Followingly, 19 respondents, all ambulance personnel, rated the eight films with the FAQA tool. We assessed concurrent validity and inter-rater agreement by visual inspection and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance. RESULTS: FAQA-scores by the expert group concurred with ± 1 of the median of the respondents on all first aid measures for all eight films except one case, where a deviation of 2 was seen. The inter-rater agreement was “very good” for three first aid measures, “good” for one, and “moderate” for the scoring of overall quality on first aid measures. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that it is feasible and acceptable for ambulance personnel to collect information on bystander first aid with the FAQA tool and will be of importance for future research on bystander first aid for injured patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00811-z. BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10071655/ /pubmed/37013526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00811-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Idland, Siri
Kramer-Johansen, Jo
Bakke, Håkon Kvåle
Hjortdahl, Magnus
Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool
title Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool
title_full Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool
title_fullStr Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool
title_full_unstemmed Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool
title_short Assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a First Aid Quality Assessment (FAQA) tool
title_sort assessing bystander first aid: development and validation of a first aid quality assessment (faqa) tool
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00811-z
work_keys_str_mv AT idlandsiri assessingbystanderfirstaiddevelopmentandvalidationofafirstaidqualityassessmentfaqatool
AT kramerjohansenjo assessingbystanderfirstaiddevelopmentandvalidationofafirstaidqualityassessmentfaqatool
AT bakkehakonkvale assessingbystanderfirstaiddevelopmentandvalidationofafirstaidqualityassessmentfaqatool
AT hjortdahlmagnus assessingbystanderfirstaiddevelopmentandvalidationofafirstaidqualityassessmentfaqatool