Cargando…

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The Induction of labor is the most common obstetric procedure in daily practice. Introducing propranolol as a new drug to augment the action of prostaglandins will help in the induction process and decrease CS rates. Several researchers have used propranolol in the augmentation of labor....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif, El Zeneiny, Hazem, Fathy, Ahmed, Nawara, Maii
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05537-1
_version_ 1785019251887702016
author Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif
El Zeneiny, Hazem
Fathy, Ahmed
Nawara, Maii
author_facet Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif
El Zeneiny, Hazem
Fathy, Ahmed
Nawara, Maii
author_sort Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Induction of labor is the most common obstetric procedure in daily practice. Introducing propranolol as a new drug to augment the action of prostaglandins will help in the induction process and decrease CS rates. Several researchers have used propranolol in the augmentation of labor. AIM: This pilot study compares propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction in primigravids. METHODS: This is a Randomized clinical trial, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial at Ain Shams University Maternity hospital. This study included 128 pregnant full-term primigravid women candidates for labor induction, randomized into two groups. All candidates underwent labor induction with 25 µg of vaginal misoprostol. Group I received 20 mg of oral propranolol tablets, while group II received sugary pills as a placebo. Candidates who responded successfully to induction were assessed for possible augmentation of labor by amniotomy or oxytocin infusion. The Primary outcome was induction to delivery interval, while the secondary outcomes were the duration of the latent phase, mode of delivery, and APGAR score of the neonate. RESULTS: The induction-delivery time was (11.8 ± 8.1 h. vs. 12.6 ± 8.9 h., P value = 0.027) and the duration of the latent phase of labor (7.9 ± 5.6 h. vs. 9.2 ± 6.03 h., P value = 0.017) were significantly shorter in the group of misoprostol and propranolol compared to the group of misoprostol and placebo. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups’ mode of delivery, indications for cesarean section, misoprostol, and oxytocin doses, or neonatal outcome. (P value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propranolol, when used with misoprostol for induction of labor, results in augmentation of action of misoprostol and a significantly shorter induction-delivery interval. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We retrospectively registered this trial in clinicaltrial.gov on 01/09/2020 (NCT04533841). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04533841
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100717222023-04-05 A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif El Zeneiny, Hazem Fathy, Ahmed Nawara, Maii BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: The Induction of labor is the most common obstetric procedure in daily practice. Introducing propranolol as a new drug to augment the action of prostaglandins will help in the induction process and decrease CS rates. Several researchers have used propranolol in the augmentation of labor. AIM: This pilot study compares propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction in primigravids. METHODS: This is a Randomized clinical trial, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial at Ain Shams University Maternity hospital. This study included 128 pregnant full-term primigravid women candidates for labor induction, randomized into two groups. All candidates underwent labor induction with 25 µg of vaginal misoprostol. Group I received 20 mg of oral propranolol tablets, while group II received sugary pills as a placebo. Candidates who responded successfully to induction were assessed for possible augmentation of labor by amniotomy or oxytocin infusion. The Primary outcome was induction to delivery interval, while the secondary outcomes were the duration of the latent phase, mode of delivery, and APGAR score of the neonate. RESULTS: The induction-delivery time was (11.8 ± 8.1 h. vs. 12.6 ± 8.9 h., P value = 0.027) and the duration of the latent phase of labor (7.9 ± 5.6 h. vs. 9.2 ± 6.03 h., P value = 0.017) were significantly shorter in the group of misoprostol and propranolol compared to the group of misoprostol and placebo. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups’ mode of delivery, indications for cesarean section, misoprostol, and oxytocin doses, or neonatal outcome. (P value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propranolol, when used with misoprostol for induction of labor, results in augmentation of action of misoprostol and a significantly shorter induction-delivery interval. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We retrospectively registered this trial in clinicaltrial.gov on 01/09/2020 (NCT04533841). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04533841 BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10071722/ /pubmed/37016326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05537-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif
El Zeneiny, Hazem
Fathy, Ahmed
Nawara, Maii
A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_full A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_fullStr A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_short A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_sort pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05537-1
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelhamidahmedsherif apilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT elzeneinyhazem apilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT fathyahmed apilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT nawaramaii apilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT abdelhamidahmedsherif pilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT elzeneinyhazem pilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT fathyahmed pilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT nawaramaii pilotstudytocomparepropranololandmisoprostolversusmisoprostolandplaceboforinductionoflaborinprimigravidaearandomizedsingleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial