Cargando…

Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are one of the most important problems among physiotherapists worldwide. However, there is no meta-analysis of the MSD prevalence in all body areas among physiotherapists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to investigate and estimate the worldwide prevalence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorce, Philippe, Jacquier-Bret, Julien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6
_version_ 1785019256322129920
author Gorce, Philippe
Jacquier-Bret, Julien
author_facet Gorce, Philippe
Jacquier-Bret, Julien
author_sort Gorce, Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are one of the most important problems among physiotherapists worldwide. However, there is no meta-analysis of the MSD prevalence in all body areas among physiotherapists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to investigate and estimate the worldwide prevalence of MSD among physiotherapists using a systematic review-, meta-analysis and meta-regression. METHODS: The systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed in 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The search was performed on PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Medeley and Science.gov databases. STUDY APPRAISAL: The quality appraisal of the included articles was assessed using the critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies AXIS. RESULTS: A total of 722 articles were found. After screening and comparison with the inclusion criteria, 26 studies were retained. Based on the random-effects model, the worldwide MSD prevalence in neck, upper back, mid back, lower back, shoulders, elbows, wrists/hands, thumb, hips/thighs, knees/legs, and ankles/feet was 26.4% (CI 95%: 21.0–31.9%), 17.7% (CI 95%: 13.2–22.2%), 14.9% (CI 95%: 7.7–22.1%), 40.1% (CI 95%: 32.2–48.0%), 20.8% (CI 95%: 16.5–25.1), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2–8.9), 18.1% (CI 95%: 14.7–21.5%), 35.4% (CI 95%: 23.0–47.8), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2–8.8), 13.0% (CI 95%: 10.3–15.8), and 5% (CI 95%: 4.0–6.9) respectively. The neck and shoulder prevalence of four continents were close to the world prevalence. No effect of continent was found on MSD prevalence. The heterogeneity of the results obtained in the meta-analysis and meta-regression was discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the random effects model, the results of the worldwide meta-analysis showed that lower back pain, thumb, neck and shoulder were the area most at risk for MSD and were therefore those to be monitored as a priority. Recommendations were proposed for future reviews and meta-analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100717442023-04-05 Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis Gorce, Philippe Jacquier-Bret, Julien BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are one of the most important problems among physiotherapists worldwide. However, there is no meta-analysis of the MSD prevalence in all body areas among physiotherapists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to investigate and estimate the worldwide prevalence of MSD among physiotherapists using a systematic review-, meta-analysis and meta-regression. METHODS: The systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed in 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The search was performed on PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Medeley and Science.gov databases. STUDY APPRAISAL: The quality appraisal of the included articles was assessed using the critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies AXIS. RESULTS: A total of 722 articles were found. After screening and comparison with the inclusion criteria, 26 studies were retained. Based on the random-effects model, the worldwide MSD prevalence in neck, upper back, mid back, lower back, shoulders, elbows, wrists/hands, thumb, hips/thighs, knees/legs, and ankles/feet was 26.4% (CI 95%: 21.0–31.9%), 17.7% (CI 95%: 13.2–22.2%), 14.9% (CI 95%: 7.7–22.1%), 40.1% (CI 95%: 32.2–48.0%), 20.8% (CI 95%: 16.5–25.1), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2–8.9), 18.1% (CI 95%: 14.7–21.5%), 35.4% (CI 95%: 23.0–47.8), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2–8.8), 13.0% (CI 95%: 10.3–15.8), and 5% (CI 95%: 4.0–6.9) respectively. The neck and shoulder prevalence of four continents were close to the world prevalence. No effect of continent was found on MSD prevalence. The heterogeneity of the results obtained in the meta-analysis and meta-regression was discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the random effects model, the results of the worldwide meta-analysis showed that lower back pain, thumb, neck and shoulder were the area most at risk for MSD and were therefore those to be monitored as a priority. Recommendations were proposed for future reviews and meta-analyses. BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10071744/ /pubmed/37016332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gorce, Philippe
Jacquier-Bret, Julien
Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gorcephilippe globalprevalenceofmusculoskeletaldisordersamongphysiotherapistsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jacquierbretjulien globalprevalenceofmusculoskeletaldisordersamongphysiotherapistsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis