Cargando…

Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study

Background: Tools to grade risk of complaint to a regulatory board have been developed for physicians but not for other health practitioner groups, including pharmacists. We aimed to develop a score that classified pharmacists into low, medium and high risk categories. Methods: Registration and comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Katherine, Spittal, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37026084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/jpps.2023.11228
_version_ 1785019269106368512
author Morris, Katherine
Spittal, Matthew J.
author_facet Morris, Katherine
Spittal, Matthew J.
author_sort Morris, Katherine
collection PubMed
description Background: Tools to grade risk of complaint to a regulatory board have been developed for physicians but not for other health practitioner groups, including pharmacists. We aimed to develop a score that classified pharmacists into low, medium and high risk categories. Methods: Registration and complaint data were sourced from Ontario College of Pharmacists for January 2009 to December 2019. We undertook recurrent event survival analysis to predict lodgement of a complaint. We identified those variables that were associated with a complaint and included these in a risk score which we called PRONE-Pharm (Predicted Risk of New Event for Pharmacists). We assessed diagnostic accuracy and used this to identify thresholds that defined low, medium and high risk. Results: We identified 3,675 complaints against 17,308 pharmacists. Being male (HR = 1.72), older age (HR range 1.43–1.54), trained internationally (HR = 1.62), ≥1 prior complaint (HR range 2.83–9.60), and complaints about mental health or substance use (HR = 1.91), compliance with conditions (HR = 1.86), fees and servicing (HR = 1.74), interpersonal behaviour or honesty (HR = 1.40), procedures (HR = 1.75) and treatment or communication or other clinical issues (HR = 1.22) were all associated with lodgement of a complaint. When converted into the PRONE-Pharm risk score, pharmacists were assigned between 0 and 98 points with higher scores closely associated with higher probability of a complaint. A score of ≥25 had sufficient accuracy for classifying medium-risk pharmacists (specificity = 87.0%) and ≥45 for high-risk pharmacists (specificity = 98.4%). Conclusion: Distinguishing isolated incidents from persistent problems poses a significant challenge for entities responsible for the regulation of pharmacists and other health practitioners. The diagnostic properties of PRONE-Pharm (minimizing the false positives) means that the risk score is useful for “ruling-out” low risk pharmacists using routinely collected regulatory data. PRONE-Pharm may be useful when used alongside interventions appropriately matched to a pharmacist’s level of risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100718272023-04-05 Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study Morris, Katherine Spittal, Matthew J. J Pharm Pharm Sci Science archive Background: Tools to grade risk of complaint to a regulatory board have been developed for physicians but not for other health practitioner groups, including pharmacists. We aimed to develop a score that classified pharmacists into low, medium and high risk categories. Methods: Registration and complaint data were sourced from Ontario College of Pharmacists for January 2009 to December 2019. We undertook recurrent event survival analysis to predict lodgement of a complaint. We identified those variables that were associated with a complaint and included these in a risk score which we called PRONE-Pharm (Predicted Risk of New Event for Pharmacists). We assessed diagnostic accuracy and used this to identify thresholds that defined low, medium and high risk. Results: We identified 3,675 complaints against 17,308 pharmacists. Being male (HR = 1.72), older age (HR range 1.43–1.54), trained internationally (HR = 1.62), ≥1 prior complaint (HR range 2.83–9.60), and complaints about mental health or substance use (HR = 1.91), compliance with conditions (HR = 1.86), fees and servicing (HR = 1.74), interpersonal behaviour or honesty (HR = 1.40), procedures (HR = 1.75) and treatment or communication or other clinical issues (HR = 1.22) were all associated with lodgement of a complaint. When converted into the PRONE-Pharm risk score, pharmacists were assigned between 0 and 98 points with higher scores closely associated with higher probability of a complaint. A score of ≥25 had sufficient accuracy for classifying medium-risk pharmacists (specificity = 87.0%) and ≥45 for high-risk pharmacists (specificity = 98.4%). Conclusion: Distinguishing isolated incidents from persistent problems poses a significant challenge for entities responsible for the regulation of pharmacists and other health practitioners. The diagnostic properties of PRONE-Pharm (minimizing the false positives) means that the risk score is useful for “ruling-out” low risk pharmacists using routinely collected regulatory data. PRONE-Pharm may be useful when used alongside interventions appropriately matched to a pharmacist’s level of risk. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10071827/ /pubmed/37026084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/jpps.2023.11228 Text en Copyright © 2023 Morris and Spittal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Science archive
Morris, Katherine
Spittal, Matthew J.
Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study
title Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort grading pharmacists’ risk of complaints to a regulator: a retrospective cohort study
topic Science archive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37026084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/jpps.2023.11228
work_keys_str_mv AT morriskatherine gradingpharmacistsriskofcomplaintstoaregulatoraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT spittalmatthewj gradingpharmacistsriskofcomplaintstoaregulatoraretrospectivecohortstudy