Cargando…

Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of Wilson disease (WD) is plagued by biochemical and clinical uncertainties. Thus, calculated parameters have been proposed. This study aimed to: (a) compare the diagnostic values of non-caeruloplasmin copper (NCC), NCC percentage (NCC%), copper-caeruloplasmin ratio (CCR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zulkufli, Nada Syazana, Sthaneshwar, Pavai, Chan, Wah-Kheong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139628
http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022019
_version_ 1785019273972809728
author Zulkufli, Nada Syazana
Sthaneshwar, Pavai
Chan, Wah-Kheong
author_facet Zulkufli, Nada Syazana
Sthaneshwar, Pavai
Chan, Wah-Kheong
author_sort Zulkufli, Nada Syazana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of Wilson disease (WD) is plagued by biochemical and clinical uncertainties. Thus, calculated parameters have been proposed. This study aimed to: (a) compare the diagnostic values of non-caeruloplasmin copper (NCC), NCC percentage (NCC%), copper-caeruloplasmin ratio (CCR) and adjusted copper in WD; and (b) derive and evaluate a discriminant function in diagnosing WD. METHODS: A total of 213 subjects across all ages who were investigated for WD were recruited. WD was confirmed in 55 patients, and the rest were WD free. Based on serum copper and caeruloplasmin values, NCC, NCC%, CCR and adjusted copper were calculated for each subject. A function was derived using discriminant analysis, and the cut-off value was determined through receiver operating characteristic analysis. Classification accuracy was found by cross-tabulation. RESULTS: Caeruloplasmin, total copper, NCC, NCC%, CCR, adjusted copper and discriminant function were significantly lower in WD compared to non-WD. Discriminant function showed the best diagnostic specificity (99.4%), sensitivity (98.2%) and classification accuracy (99.1%). Caeruloplasmin levels <0.14 g/L showed higher accuracy than the recommended 0.20 g/L cut-off value (97.7% vs. 87.8%). Similarly, molar NCC below the European cut-off of 1.6 umol/L showed higher accuracy than the American cut-off of 3.9 umol/L (80.3% vs. 59.6%) (P < 0.001). NCC%, mass NCC, CCR and adjusted copper showed poorer performances. CONCLUSION: Discriminant function differentiates WD from non-WD with excellent specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. Performance of serum caeruloplasmin <0.14 g/L was better than that of <0.20 g/L. NCC, NCC%, CCR and adjusted copper are not helpful in diagnosing WD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10071855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100718552023-04-05 Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease Zulkufli, Nada Syazana Sthaneshwar, Pavai Chan, Wah-Kheong Singapore Med J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of Wilson disease (WD) is plagued by biochemical and clinical uncertainties. Thus, calculated parameters have been proposed. This study aimed to: (a) compare the diagnostic values of non-caeruloplasmin copper (NCC), NCC percentage (NCC%), copper-caeruloplasmin ratio (CCR) and adjusted copper in WD; and (b) derive and evaluate a discriminant function in diagnosing WD. METHODS: A total of 213 subjects across all ages who were investigated for WD were recruited. WD was confirmed in 55 patients, and the rest were WD free. Based on serum copper and caeruloplasmin values, NCC, NCC%, CCR and adjusted copper were calculated for each subject. A function was derived using discriminant analysis, and the cut-off value was determined through receiver operating characteristic analysis. Classification accuracy was found by cross-tabulation. RESULTS: Caeruloplasmin, total copper, NCC, NCC%, CCR, adjusted copper and discriminant function were significantly lower in WD compared to non-WD. Discriminant function showed the best diagnostic specificity (99.4%), sensitivity (98.2%) and classification accuracy (99.1%). Caeruloplasmin levels <0.14 g/L showed higher accuracy than the recommended 0.20 g/L cut-off value (97.7% vs. 87.8%). Similarly, molar NCC below the European cut-off of 1.6 umol/L showed higher accuracy than the American cut-off of 3.9 umol/L (80.3% vs. 59.6%) (P < 0.001). NCC%, mass NCC, CCR and adjusted copper showed poorer performances. CONCLUSION: Discriminant function differentiates WD from non-WD with excellent specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. Performance of serum caeruloplasmin <0.14 g/L was better than that of <0.20 g/L. NCC, NCC%, CCR and adjusted copper are not helpful in diagnosing WD. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10071855/ /pubmed/35139628 http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022019 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Singapore Medical Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zulkufli, Nada Syazana
Sthaneshwar, Pavai
Chan, Wah-Kheong
Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease
title Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease
title_full Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease
title_fullStr Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease
title_full_unstemmed Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease
title_short Calculated parameters for the diagnosis of Wilson disease
title_sort calculated parameters for the diagnosis of wilson disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139628
http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022019
work_keys_str_mv AT zulkuflinadasyazana calculatedparametersforthediagnosisofwilsondisease
AT sthaneshwarpavai calculatedparametersforthediagnosisofwilsondisease
AT chanwahkheong calculatedparametersforthediagnosisofwilsondisease