Cargando…
Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
INTRODUCTION: Induction of labor is one of the most common obstetrical procedures today, with a successively rising rate. With a limited number of hospital beds, the option of starting induction at home has gained increasing attention. The primary aim of this study was to compare the proportion of w...
Autores principales: | Hallén, Natalie, Amini, Mahdi, Wide‐Swensson, Dag, Herbst, Andreas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10072241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36965000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14550 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Women’s experiences and views of outpatient and inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A secondary qualitative study
por: Hægeland, Hanne A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation—a randomized study
por: Anjali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)