Cargando…

Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities

The value of early intervention is well demonstrated; however, less is known about the processes that initial evaluation teams use to evaluate and determine young children’s eligibility for early intervention (EI) and preschool special education. The present study surveyed multidisciplinary early ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stein, Rachel, Steed, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer New York 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10072816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00467-3
_version_ 1785019462796181504
author Stein, Rachel
Steed, Elizabeth
author_facet Stein, Rachel
Steed, Elizabeth
author_sort Stein, Rachel
collection PubMed
description The value of early intervention is well demonstrated; however, less is known about the processes that initial evaluation teams use to evaluate and determine young children’s eligibility for early intervention (EI) and preschool special education. The present study surveyed multidisciplinary early childhood providers (N = 1445) who conduct initial evaluations for young children. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive analyses to describe the location of initial evaluations, tools used, team membership, and approaches to eligibility determination for children with possible delays and disabilities. Evaluation practices varied greatly, but evaluation teams most often included early childhood special educators and speech and language pathologists, school psychologists or other specialists were less frequently involved. Eligibility approaches were also wide-ranging with percentage delay and standard deviation below the mean most often used; several challenges when determining eligibility were also described. Evaluations for EI and preschool special education were compared to look at variations. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing evaluations focused on eligibility for EI or preschool special education. Implications and future directions are explored. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40688-023-00467-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10072816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer New York
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100728162023-04-05 Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities Stein, Rachel Steed, Elizabeth Contemp Sch Psychol Article The value of early intervention is well demonstrated; however, less is known about the processes that initial evaluation teams use to evaluate and determine young children’s eligibility for early intervention (EI) and preschool special education. The present study surveyed multidisciplinary early childhood providers (N = 1445) who conduct initial evaluations for young children. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive analyses to describe the location of initial evaluations, tools used, team membership, and approaches to eligibility determination for children with possible delays and disabilities. Evaluation practices varied greatly, but evaluation teams most often included early childhood special educators and speech and language pathologists, school psychologists or other specialists were less frequently involved. Eligibility approaches were also wide-ranging with percentage delay and standard deviation below the mean most often used; several challenges when determining eligibility were also described. Evaluations for EI and preschool special education were compared to look at variations. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing evaluations focused on eligibility for EI or preschool special education. Implications and future directions are explored. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40688-023-00467-3. Springer New York 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10072816/ /pubmed/37359143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00467-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to California Association of School Psychologists 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Stein, Rachel
Steed, Elizabeth
Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities
title Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities
title_full Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities
title_fullStr Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities
title_short Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays and Disabilities
title_sort initial evaluation practices to identify young children with delays and disabilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10072816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00467-3
work_keys_str_mv AT steinrachel initialevaluationpracticestoidentifyyoungchildrenwithdelaysanddisabilities
AT steedelizabeth initialevaluationpracticestoidentifyyoungchildrenwithdelaysanddisabilities