Cargando…

Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling

Introduction: Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and the application of kinetic models can provide important quantitative information based on its temporal information. This however requires arterial blood sampling, which can be challenging to acquire. Nowadays, state-of-the-art PET/CT syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reed, Murray Bruce, Godbersen, Godber Mathis, Vraka, Chrysoula, Rausch, Ivo, Ponce de León, Magdalena, Popper, Valentin, Geist, Barbara, Nics, Lukas, Komorowski, Arkadiusz, Karanikas, Georgios, Beyer, Thomas, Traub-Weidinger, Tatjana, Hahn, Andreas, Langsteger, Werner, Hacker, Marcus, Lanzenberger, Rupert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1074052
_version_ 1785019570103255040
author Reed, Murray Bruce
Godbersen, Godber Mathis
Vraka, Chrysoula
Rausch, Ivo
Ponce de León, Magdalena
Popper, Valentin
Geist, Barbara
Nics, Lukas
Komorowski, Arkadiusz
Karanikas, Georgios
Beyer, Thomas
Traub-Weidinger, Tatjana
Hahn, Andreas
Langsteger, Werner
Hacker, Marcus
Lanzenberger, Rupert
author_facet Reed, Murray Bruce
Godbersen, Godber Mathis
Vraka, Chrysoula
Rausch, Ivo
Ponce de León, Magdalena
Popper, Valentin
Geist, Barbara
Nics, Lukas
Komorowski, Arkadiusz
Karanikas, Georgios
Beyer, Thomas
Traub-Weidinger, Tatjana
Hahn, Andreas
Langsteger, Werner
Hacker, Marcus
Lanzenberger, Rupert
author_sort Reed, Murray Bruce
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and the application of kinetic models can provide important quantitative information based on its temporal information. This however requires arterial blood sampling, which can be challenging to acquire. Nowadays, state-of-the-art PET/CT systems offer fully automated, whole-body (WB) kinetic modelling protocols using image-derived input functions (IDIF) to replace arterial blood sampling. Here, we compared the validity of an automatic WB kinetic model protocol to the reference standard arterial input function (AIF) for both clinical and research settings. Methods: Sixteen healthy participants underwent dynamic WB [(18)F]FDG scans using a continuous bed motion PET/CT system with simultaneous arterial blood sampling. Multiple processing pipelines that included automatic and manually generated IDIFs derived from the aorta and left ventricle, with and without motion correction were compared to the AIF. Subsequently generated quantitative images of glucose metabolism were compared to evaluate performance of the different input functions. Results: We observed moderate to high correlations between IDIFs and the AIF regarding area under the curve (r = 0.49–0.89) as well as for the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlu) (r = 0.68–0.95). Manual placing of IDIFs and motion correction further improved their similarity to the AIF. Discussion: In general, the automatic vendor protocol is a feasible approach for the quantification of CMRGlu for both, clinical and research settings where expertise or time is not available. However, we advise on a rigorous inspection of the placement of the volume of interest, the resulting IDIF, and the quantitative values to ensure valid interpretations. In protocols requiring longer scan times or where cohorts are prone to involuntary movement, manual IDIF definition with additional motion correction is recommended, as this has greater accuracy and reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10073457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100734572023-04-06 Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling Reed, Murray Bruce Godbersen, Godber Mathis Vraka, Chrysoula Rausch, Ivo Ponce de León, Magdalena Popper, Valentin Geist, Barbara Nics, Lukas Komorowski, Arkadiusz Karanikas, Georgios Beyer, Thomas Traub-Weidinger, Tatjana Hahn, Andreas Langsteger, Werner Hacker, Marcus Lanzenberger, Rupert Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and the application of kinetic models can provide important quantitative information based on its temporal information. This however requires arterial blood sampling, which can be challenging to acquire. Nowadays, state-of-the-art PET/CT systems offer fully automated, whole-body (WB) kinetic modelling protocols using image-derived input functions (IDIF) to replace arterial blood sampling. Here, we compared the validity of an automatic WB kinetic model protocol to the reference standard arterial input function (AIF) for both clinical and research settings. Methods: Sixteen healthy participants underwent dynamic WB [(18)F]FDG scans using a continuous bed motion PET/CT system with simultaneous arterial blood sampling. Multiple processing pipelines that included automatic and manually generated IDIFs derived from the aorta and left ventricle, with and without motion correction were compared to the AIF. Subsequently generated quantitative images of glucose metabolism were compared to evaluate performance of the different input functions. Results: We observed moderate to high correlations between IDIFs and the AIF regarding area under the curve (r = 0.49–0.89) as well as for the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlu) (r = 0.68–0.95). Manual placing of IDIFs and motion correction further improved their similarity to the AIF. Discussion: In general, the automatic vendor protocol is a feasible approach for the quantification of CMRGlu for both, clinical and research settings where expertise or time is not available. However, we advise on a rigorous inspection of the placement of the volume of interest, the resulting IDIF, and the quantitative values to ensure valid interpretations. In protocols requiring longer scan times or where cohorts are prone to involuntary movement, manual IDIF definition with additional motion correction is recommended, as this has greater accuracy and reliability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10073457/ /pubmed/37035658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1074052 Text en Copyright © 2023 Reed, Godbersen, Vraka, Rausch, Ponce de León, Popper, Geist, Nics, Komorowski, Karanikas, Beyer, Traub-Weidinger, Hahn, Langsteger, Hacker and Lanzenberger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Reed, Murray Bruce
Godbersen, Godber Mathis
Vraka, Chrysoula
Rausch, Ivo
Ponce de León, Magdalena
Popper, Valentin
Geist, Barbara
Nics, Lukas
Komorowski, Arkadiusz
Karanikas, Georgios
Beyer, Thomas
Traub-Weidinger, Tatjana
Hahn, Andreas
Langsteger, Werner
Hacker, Marcus
Lanzenberger, Rupert
Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
title Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
title_full Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
title_fullStr Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
title_short Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
title_sort comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [(18)f]fdg imaging with arterial blood sampling
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1074052
work_keys_str_mv AT reedmurraybruce comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT godbersengodbermathis comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT vrakachrysoula comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT rauschivo comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT poncedeleonmagdalena comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT poppervalentin comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT geistbarbara comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT nicslukas comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT komorowskiarkadiusz comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT karanikasgeorgios comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT beyerthomas comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT traubweidingertatjana comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT hahnandreas comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT langstegerwerner comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT hackermarcus comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling
AT lanzenbergerrupert comparisonofcardiacimagederivedinputfunctionsforquantitativewholebody18ffdgimagingwitharterialbloodsampling