Cargando…
The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation
BACKGROUND: Burnout and depression among health professions education (HPE) students continue to rise, leading to unwanted effects that ultimately jeopardise optimal medical care and patient health. Promoting the resilience of medical students is one solution to this issue. Several interventions hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04177-5 |
_version_ | 1785019610727186432 |
---|---|
author | Wadi, Majed Mohammed Yusoff, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Taha, Mohamed Hassan Shorbagi, Sarra Nik Lah, Nik Ahmad Zuky Abdul Rahim, Ahmad Fuad |
author_facet | Wadi, Majed Mohammed Yusoff, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Taha, Mohamed Hassan Shorbagi, Sarra Nik Lah, Nik Ahmad Zuky Abdul Rahim, Ahmad Fuad |
author_sort | Wadi, Majed Mohammed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Burnout and depression among health professions education (HPE) students continue to rise, leading to unwanted effects that ultimately jeopardise optimal medical care and patient health. Promoting the resilience of medical students is one solution to this issue. Several interventions have been implemented to foster resilience, but they focus on aspects other than the primary cause: the assessment system. The purpose of this study is to develop a framework to promote resilience in assessment planning and practice. METHODS: We followed the guidelines suggested by Whetten for constructing a theoretical model for framework development. There were four phases in the model development. In the first phase, different literature review methods were used, and additional students’ perspectives were collected through focus group discussions. Then, using the data, we constructed the theoretical model in the second phase. In the third phase, we validated the newly developed model and its related guidelines. Finally, we performed response process validation of the model with a group of medical teachers. RESULTS: The developed systematic assessment resilience framework (SAR) promotes four constructs: self-control, management, engagement, and growth, through five phases of assessment: assessment experience, assessment direction, assessment preparation, examiner focus, and student reflection. Each phase contains a number of practical guidelines to promote resilience. We rigorously triangulated each approach with its theoretical foundations and evaluated it on the basis of its content and process. The model showed high levels of content and face validity. CONCLUSIONS: The SAR model offers a novel guideline for fostering resilience through assessment planning and practice. It includes a number of attainable and practical guidelines for enhancing resilience. In addition, it opens a new horizon for HPE students’ future use of this framework in the new normal condition (post COVID 19). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04177-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10073620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100736202023-04-05 The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation Wadi, Majed Mohammed Yusoff, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Taha, Mohamed Hassan Shorbagi, Sarra Nik Lah, Nik Ahmad Zuky Abdul Rahim, Ahmad Fuad BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Burnout and depression among health professions education (HPE) students continue to rise, leading to unwanted effects that ultimately jeopardise optimal medical care and patient health. Promoting the resilience of medical students is one solution to this issue. Several interventions have been implemented to foster resilience, but they focus on aspects other than the primary cause: the assessment system. The purpose of this study is to develop a framework to promote resilience in assessment planning and practice. METHODS: We followed the guidelines suggested by Whetten for constructing a theoretical model for framework development. There were four phases in the model development. In the first phase, different literature review methods were used, and additional students’ perspectives were collected through focus group discussions. Then, using the data, we constructed the theoretical model in the second phase. In the third phase, we validated the newly developed model and its related guidelines. Finally, we performed response process validation of the model with a group of medical teachers. RESULTS: The developed systematic assessment resilience framework (SAR) promotes four constructs: self-control, management, engagement, and growth, through five phases of assessment: assessment experience, assessment direction, assessment preparation, examiner focus, and student reflection. Each phase contains a number of practical guidelines to promote resilience. We rigorously triangulated each approach with its theoretical foundations and evaluated it on the basis of its content and process. The model showed high levels of content and face validity. CONCLUSIONS: The SAR model offers a novel guideline for fostering resilience through assessment planning and practice. It includes a number of attainable and practical guidelines for enhancing resilience. In addition, it opens a new horizon for HPE students’ future use of this framework in the new normal condition (post COVID 19). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04177-5. BioMed Central 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10073620/ /pubmed/37016407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04177-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wadi, Majed Mohammed Yusoff, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Taha, Mohamed Hassan Shorbagi, Sarra Nik Lah, Nik Ahmad Zuky Abdul Rahim, Ahmad Fuad The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation |
title | The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation |
title_full | The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation |
title_fullStr | The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed | The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation |
title_short | The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation |
title_sort | framework of systematic assessment for resilience (sar): development and validation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04177-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadimajedmohammed theframeworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT yusoffmuhamadsaifulbahri theframeworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT tahamohamedhassan theframeworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT shorbagisarra theframeworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT niklahnikahmadzuky theframeworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT abdulrahimahmadfuad theframeworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT wadimajedmohammed frameworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT yusoffmuhamadsaifulbahri frameworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT tahamohamedhassan frameworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT shorbagisarra frameworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT niklahnikahmadzuky frameworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation AT abdulrahimahmadfuad frameworkofsystematicassessmentforresiliencesardevelopmentandvalidation |