Cargando…

Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Studies have reported that breast cancer (BC) patients’ circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have varying results for their diagnostic role. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically assess the accuracy of CTCs in the diagnosis of BC. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Tao, Chen, Yao, Chen, Qing-Yan, Xiong, Yang, Yang, Ji-Qiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035139
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1103146
_version_ 1785019615015862272
author Jin, Tao
Chen, Yao
Chen, Qing-Yan
Xiong, Yang
Yang, Ji-Qiao
author_facet Jin, Tao
Chen, Yao
Chen, Qing-Yan
Xiong, Yang
Yang, Ji-Qiao
author_sort Jin, Tao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Studies have reported that breast cancer (BC) patients’ circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have varying results for their diagnostic role. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically assess the accuracy of CTCs in the diagnosis of BC. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall accuracy of CTC detection. A pooled analysis of sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic advantage ratio (DOR) was used to measure diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to discriminate BC from non-BC. An analysis of the threshold effect was calculated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. We calculated the Q and I2 statistics to determine whether the studies were heterogeneous. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies one by one. Publication bias was assessed by Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test. RESULTS: Studies from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, Vip, and CNKI databases were collected for diagnosing BC from January 2000 to April March 2023. Finally, 8 publications were retrieved in total containing 2014 cases involved in the study. Based on a random-effects model, it was found that the pooled SEN was 0.69 (0.55 - 0.80), SPE was 0.93 (0.60 - 0.99), PLR was 9.5 (1.4 - 65.9), NLR was 0.33 (0.23 - 0.48), DOR was 29 (4 - 205) and the AUC of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.81 (0.77 - 0.84). Some heterogeneity was found in the article, but there was no threshold effect to account for it (P = 0.27). Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test indicated that no publication bias was observed in this meta-analysis (P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis confirmed that CTCs were an important component of noninvasive methods of confirming BC with SEN of 0.69 (0.55 - 0.80), SPE of 0.93 (0.60 - 0.99) and AUC of 0.81 (0.77 - 0.84).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10073650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100736502023-04-06 Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis Jin, Tao Chen, Yao Chen, Qing-Yan Xiong, Yang Yang, Ji-Qiao Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: Studies have reported that breast cancer (BC) patients’ circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have varying results for their diagnostic role. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically assess the accuracy of CTCs in the diagnosis of BC. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall accuracy of CTC detection. A pooled analysis of sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic advantage ratio (DOR) was used to measure diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to discriminate BC from non-BC. An analysis of the threshold effect was calculated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. We calculated the Q and I2 statistics to determine whether the studies were heterogeneous. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies one by one. Publication bias was assessed by Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test. RESULTS: Studies from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, Vip, and CNKI databases were collected for diagnosing BC from January 2000 to April March 2023. Finally, 8 publications were retrieved in total containing 2014 cases involved in the study. Based on a random-effects model, it was found that the pooled SEN was 0.69 (0.55 - 0.80), SPE was 0.93 (0.60 - 0.99), PLR was 9.5 (1.4 - 65.9), NLR was 0.33 (0.23 - 0.48), DOR was 29 (4 - 205) and the AUC of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.81 (0.77 - 0.84). Some heterogeneity was found in the article, but there was no threshold effect to account for it (P = 0.27). Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test indicated that no publication bias was observed in this meta-analysis (P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis confirmed that CTCs were an important component of noninvasive methods of confirming BC with SEN of 0.69 (0.55 - 0.80), SPE of 0.93 (0.60 - 0.99) and AUC of 0.81 (0.77 - 0.84). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10073650/ /pubmed/37035139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1103146 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jin, Chen, Chen, Xiong and Yang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Jin, Tao
Chen, Yao
Chen, Qing-Yan
Xiong, Yang
Yang, Ji-Qiao
Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
title Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
title_short Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
title_sort circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035139
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1103146
work_keys_str_mv AT jintao circulatingtumorcellsinperipheralbloodasadiagnosticbiomarkerofbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT chenyao circulatingtumorcellsinperipheralbloodasadiagnosticbiomarkerofbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT chenqingyan circulatingtumorcellsinperipheralbloodasadiagnosticbiomarkerofbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT xiongyang circulatingtumorcellsinperipheralbloodasadiagnosticbiomarkerofbreastcancerametaanalysis
AT yangjiqiao circulatingtumorcellsinperipheralbloodasadiagnosticbiomarkerofbreastcancerametaanalysis