Cargando…
The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care
INTRODUCTION: Patient data are increasingly available in (multi)national registries, especially for rare diseases. This study aims to provide an overview of current European registries of paediatric kidney transplantation (PKT) care, their coverage, and their focus. Based on these data, we assess wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1121282 |
_version_ | 1785019637613723648 |
---|---|
author | Oomen, Loes De Wall, Liesbeth L. Krupka, Kai Tönshoff, Burkhard Wlodkowski, Tanja Van Der Zanden, Loes FM Bonthuis, Marjolein Duus Weinreich, Ilse D. Koster-Kamphuis, Linda Feitz, Wout FJ Bootsma-Robroeks, Charlotte MHHT |
author_facet | Oomen, Loes De Wall, Liesbeth L. Krupka, Kai Tönshoff, Burkhard Wlodkowski, Tanja Van Der Zanden, Loes FM Bonthuis, Marjolein Duus Weinreich, Ilse D. Koster-Kamphuis, Linda Feitz, Wout FJ Bootsma-Robroeks, Charlotte MHHT |
author_sort | Oomen, Loes |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient data are increasingly available in (multi)national registries, especially for rare diseases. This study aims to provide an overview of current European registries of paediatric kidney transplantation (PKT) care, their coverage, and their focus. Based on these data, we assess whether the current status is optimal for achieving our common goal: the optimalisation of health care. METHODS: A list of all PKT centres within the European Union (EU) as well as active PKT registries was compiled using existing literature and the European Platform on Rare Disease Registration. Registry staff members were contacted to obtain information about the parameters collected and the registry design. These data were compared between registries. RESULTS: In total, 109 PKT centres performing PKT surgery were identified in the 27 EU Member States. Currently, five European PKT registries are actively collecting data. In 39% of these centres, no data were registered within any of these five existing international registries. A large variety was observed in the number of patients, centres, and countries involved in the registries. Furthermore, variability existed regarding the inclusion criteria, definitions used, and parameters collected. Collection of perioperative urologic data are currently underrepresented in the registries. DISCUSSION: Currently, multiple registries are collecting valuable information in the field of PKT, covering the majority of PKT centres in Europe. Due to a large variety in the parameters collected as well as different focuses, data collection is currently fragmented and suboptimal; therefore, the current existing data are incomplete. In addition, a considerable proportion of the transplantation centres do not enter data in any international registry. Combining available information and harmonising future data collection could empower the aim of these registries—namely increasing insights into the strengths and potential of current care and therefore improve healthcare |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10073744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100737442023-04-06 The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care Oomen, Loes De Wall, Liesbeth L. Krupka, Kai Tönshoff, Burkhard Wlodkowski, Tanja Van Der Zanden, Loes FM Bonthuis, Marjolein Duus Weinreich, Ilse D. Koster-Kamphuis, Linda Feitz, Wout FJ Bootsma-Robroeks, Charlotte MHHT Front Pediatr Pediatrics INTRODUCTION: Patient data are increasingly available in (multi)national registries, especially for rare diseases. This study aims to provide an overview of current European registries of paediatric kidney transplantation (PKT) care, their coverage, and their focus. Based on these data, we assess whether the current status is optimal for achieving our common goal: the optimalisation of health care. METHODS: A list of all PKT centres within the European Union (EU) as well as active PKT registries was compiled using existing literature and the European Platform on Rare Disease Registration. Registry staff members were contacted to obtain information about the parameters collected and the registry design. These data were compared between registries. RESULTS: In total, 109 PKT centres performing PKT surgery were identified in the 27 EU Member States. Currently, five European PKT registries are actively collecting data. In 39% of these centres, no data were registered within any of these five existing international registries. A large variety was observed in the number of patients, centres, and countries involved in the registries. Furthermore, variability existed regarding the inclusion criteria, definitions used, and parameters collected. Collection of perioperative urologic data are currently underrepresented in the registries. DISCUSSION: Currently, multiple registries are collecting valuable information in the field of PKT, covering the majority of PKT centres in Europe. Due to a large variety in the parameters collected as well as different focuses, data collection is currently fragmented and suboptimal; therefore, the current existing data are incomplete. In addition, a considerable proportion of the transplantation centres do not enter data in any international registry. Combining available information and harmonising future data collection could empower the aim of these registries—namely increasing insights into the strengths and potential of current care and therefore improve healthcare Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10073744/ /pubmed/37033192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1121282 Text en © 2023 Oomen, De Wall, Krupka, Tönshoff, Wlodkowski, Van Der Zanden, Bonthuis, Duus Weinreich, Koster-Kamphuis, Feitz and Bootsma-Robroeks. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Oomen, Loes De Wall, Liesbeth L. Krupka, Kai Tönshoff, Burkhard Wlodkowski, Tanja Van Der Zanden, Loes FM Bonthuis, Marjolein Duus Weinreich, Ilse D. Koster-Kamphuis, Linda Feitz, Wout FJ Bootsma-Robroeks, Charlotte MHHT The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
title | The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
title_full | The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
title_fullStr | The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
title_full_unstemmed | The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
title_short | The strengths and complexities of European registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
title_sort | strengths and complexities of european registries concerning paediatric kidney transplantation health care |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1121282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oomenloes thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT dewallliesbethl thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT krupkakai thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT tonshoffburkhard thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT wlodkowskitanja thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT vanderzandenloesfm thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT bonthuismarjolein thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT duusweinreichilsed thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT kosterkamphuislinda thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT feitzwoutfj thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT bootsmarobroekscharlottemhht thestrengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT oomenloes strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT dewallliesbethl strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT krupkakai strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT tonshoffburkhard strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT wlodkowskitanja strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT vanderzandenloesfm strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT bonthuismarjolein strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT duusweinreichilsed strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT kosterkamphuislinda strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT feitzwoutfj strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare AT bootsmarobroekscharlottemhht strengthsandcomplexitiesofeuropeanregistriesconcerningpaediatrickidneytransplantationhealthcare |