Cargando…

Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rate of real-world inpatient rehabilitation therapy (IRT) after stroke. We aimed to determine the rate of inpatient rehabilitation therapy and its associated factors in patients who undergo reperfusion therapy in China. METHODS: This national prospective registr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shengde, Lu, Yixiu, Fang, Shiyuan, Wang, Longde, Peng, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03144-3
_version_ 1785019644251209728
author Li, Shengde
Lu, Yixiu
Fang, Shiyuan
Wang, Longde
Peng, Bin
author_facet Li, Shengde
Lu, Yixiu
Fang, Shiyuan
Wang, Longde
Peng, Bin
author_sort Li, Shengde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rate of real-world inpatient rehabilitation therapy (IRT) after stroke. We aimed to determine the rate of inpatient rehabilitation therapy and its associated factors in patients who undergo reperfusion therapy in China. METHODS: This national prospective registry study included hospitalized ischemic stroke patients aged 14–99 years with reperfusion therapy between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020, collecting hospital-level and patient-level demographic and clinical data. IRT included acupuncture or massage, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and others. The primary outcome was the rate of patients receiving IRT. RESULTS: We included 209,189 eligible patients from 2191 hospitals. The median age was 66 years, and 64.2% were men. Four in five patients received only thrombolysis, and the rest 19.2% underwent endovascular therapy. The overall rate of IRT was 58.2% (95% CI, 58.0–58.5%). Differences in demographic and clinical variables existed between patients with and without IRT. The rates of acupuncture or massage, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and other rehabilitation interventions were 38.0%, 28.8%, 11.8%, 14.4%, and 22.9%, respectively. The rates of single and multimodal interventions were 28.3% and 30.0%, respectively. A lower likelihood of receiving IRT was associated with being 14–50 or 76–99 years old, female, from Northeast China, from Class-C hospitals, receiving only thrombolysis, having severe stroke or severe deterioration, a short length of stay, Covid-19 pandemic and having intracranial or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Among our patient population, the IRT rate was low with limited use of physical therapy, multimodal interventions, and rehabilitation centers and varied by demographic and clinical features. The implementation of IRT remains a challenge for stroke care, warranting urgent and effective national programs to enhance post-stroke rehabilitation and the adherence to guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-023-03144-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10073784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100737842023-04-05 Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study Li, Shengde Lu, Yixiu Fang, Shiyuan Wang, Longde Peng, Bin BMC Neurol Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rate of real-world inpatient rehabilitation therapy (IRT) after stroke. We aimed to determine the rate of inpatient rehabilitation therapy and its associated factors in patients who undergo reperfusion therapy in China. METHODS: This national prospective registry study included hospitalized ischemic stroke patients aged 14–99 years with reperfusion therapy between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020, collecting hospital-level and patient-level demographic and clinical data. IRT included acupuncture or massage, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and others. The primary outcome was the rate of patients receiving IRT. RESULTS: We included 209,189 eligible patients from 2191 hospitals. The median age was 66 years, and 64.2% were men. Four in five patients received only thrombolysis, and the rest 19.2% underwent endovascular therapy. The overall rate of IRT was 58.2% (95% CI, 58.0–58.5%). Differences in demographic and clinical variables existed between patients with and without IRT. The rates of acupuncture or massage, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and other rehabilitation interventions were 38.0%, 28.8%, 11.8%, 14.4%, and 22.9%, respectively. The rates of single and multimodal interventions were 28.3% and 30.0%, respectively. A lower likelihood of receiving IRT was associated with being 14–50 or 76–99 years old, female, from Northeast China, from Class-C hospitals, receiving only thrombolysis, having severe stroke or severe deterioration, a short length of stay, Covid-19 pandemic and having intracranial or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Among our patient population, the IRT rate was low with limited use of physical therapy, multimodal interventions, and rehabilitation centers and varied by demographic and clinical features. The implementation of IRT remains a challenge for stroke care, warranting urgent and effective national programs to enhance post-stroke rehabilitation and the adherence to guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-023-03144-3. BioMed Central 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10073784/ /pubmed/37020194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03144-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Shengde
Lu, Yixiu
Fang, Shiyuan
Wang, Longde
Peng, Bin
Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
title Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
title_full Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
title_fullStr Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
title_full_unstemmed Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
title_short Inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
title_sort inpatient rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with reperfusion therapy: a national prospective registry study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03144-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lishengde inpatientrehabilitationtherapyinstrokepatientswithreperfusiontherapyanationalprospectiveregistrystudy
AT luyixiu inpatientrehabilitationtherapyinstrokepatientswithreperfusiontherapyanationalprospectiveregistrystudy
AT fangshiyuan inpatientrehabilitationtherapyinstrokepatientswithreperfusiontherapyanationalprospectiveregistrystudy
AT wanglongde inpatientrehabilitationtherapyinstrokepatientswithreperfusiontherapyanationalprospectiveregistrystudy
AT pengbin inpatientrehabilitationtherapyinstrokepatientswithreperfusiontherapyanationalprospectiveregistrystudy