Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases
PURPOSE: There has been limited work assessing the use of re-irradiation (re-RT) for local failure following stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS). We reviewed our institutional experience of conventionally-fractionated external beam radiation (cEBRT) for salvage therapy following SSRS local failu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2022.00353 |
_version_ | 1785019655060979712 |
---|---|
author | Florez, Marcus A. De, Brian Chapman, Bhavana V. Prayongrat, Anussara Thomas, Jonathan G. Beckham, Thomas H. Wang, Chenyang Yeboa, Debra N. Bishop, Andrew J. Briere, Tina Amini, Behrang Li, Jing Tatsui, Claudio E. Rhines, Laurence D. Ghia, Amol J. |
author_facet | Florez, Marcus A. De, Brian Chapman, Bhavana V. Prayongrat, Anussara Thomas, Jonathan G. Beckham, Thomas H. Wang, Chenyang Yeboa, Debra N. Bishop, Andrew J. Briere, Tina Amini, Behrang Li, Jing Tatsui, Claudio E. Rhines, Laurence D. Ghia, Amol J. |
author_sort | Florez, Marcus A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There has been limited work assessing the use of re-irradiation (re-RT) for local failure following stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS). We reviewed our institutional experience of conventionally-fractionated external beam radiation (cEBRT) for salvage therapy following SSRS local failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 54 patients that underwent salvage conventional re-RT at previously SSRS-treated sites. Local control following re-RT was defined as the absence of progression at the treated site as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Competing risk analysis for local failure was performed using a Fine-Gray model. The median follow-up time was 25 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8–24.9 months) following cEBRT re-RT. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed Karnofsky performance score prior to re-RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.98; p = 0.003) and time to local failure (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94–1.00; p = 0.04) were associated with longer OS, while male sex (HR = 3.92; 95% CI, 1.64–9.33; p = 0.002) was associated with shorter OS. Local control at 12 months was 81% (95% CI, 69.3–94.0). Competing risk multivariable regression revealed radioresistant tumors (subhazard ratio [subHR] = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15–0.90; p = 0.028) and epidural disease (subHR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12–0.78; p =0.013) were associated with increased risk of local failure. At 12 months, 91% of patients maintained ambulatory function. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that cEBRT following SSRS local failure can be used safely and effectively. Further investigation is needed into optimal patient selection for cEBRT in the retreatment setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10073838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100738382023-04-06 Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases Florez, Marcus A. De, Brian Chapman, Bhavana V. Prayongrat, Anussara Thomas, Jonathan G. Beckham, Thomas H. Wang, Chenyang Yeboa, Debra N. Bishop, Andrew J. Briere, Tina Amini, Behrang Li, Jing Tatsui, Claudio E. Rhines, Laurence D. Ghia, Amol J. Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: There has been limited work assessing the use of re-irradiation (re-RT) for local failure following stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS). We reviewed our institutional experience of conventionally-fractionated external beam radiation (cEBRT) for salvage therapy following SSRS local failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 54 patients that underwent salvage conventional re-RT at previously SSRS-treated sites. Local control following re-RT was defined as the absence of progression at the treated site as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Competing risk analysis for local failure was performed using a Fine-Gray model. The median follow-up time was 25 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8–24.9 months) following cEBRT re-RT. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed Karnofsky performance score prior to re-RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.98; p = 0.003) and time to local failure (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94–1.00; p = 0.04) were associated with longer OS, while male sex (HR = 3.92; 95% CI, 1.64–9.33; p = 0.002) was associated with shorter OS. Local control at 12 months was 81% (95% CI, 69.3–94.0). Competing risk multivariable regression revealed radioresistant tumors (subhazard ratio [subHR] = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15–0.90; p = 0.028) and epidural disease (subHR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12–0.78; p =0.013) were associated with increased risk of local failure. At 12 months, 91% of patients maintained ambulatory function. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that cEBRT following SSRS local failure can be used safely and effectively. Further investigation is needed into optimal patient selection for cEBRT in the retreatment setting. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2023-03 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10073838/ /pubmed/37013414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2022.00353 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Florez, Marcus A. De, Brian Chapman, Bhavana V. Prayongrat, Anussara Thomas, Jonathan G. Beckham, Thomas H. Wang, Chenyang Yeboa, Debra N. Bishop, Andrew J. Briere, Tina Amini, Behrang Li, Jing Tatsui, Claudio E. Rhines, Laurence D. Ghia, Amol J. Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
title | Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10073838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2022.00353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT florezmarcusa safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT debrian safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT chapmanbhavanav safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT prayongratanussara safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT thomasjonathang safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT beckhamthomash safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT wangchenyang safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT yeboadebran safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT bishopandrewj safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT brieretina safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT aminibehrang safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT lijing safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT tatsuiclaudioe safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT rhineslaurenced safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases AT ghiaamolj safetyandefficacyofsalvageconventionalreirradiationfollowingstereotacticradiosurgeryforspinemetastases |