Cargando…

Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology

IMPORTANCE: A growing number of children are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, there is a lack of studies systematically analyzing the genetic landscape of live-born children conceived through ART who need intensive care in the neonatal period. OBJECTIVE: To investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Zhongwen, Xiao, Feifan, Xiao, Hui, Lu, Yulan, Yang, Lin, Zhuang, Deyi, Chen, Liping, Wei, Qiufen, Jiang, Yinmo, Li, Gang, Wu, Bingbing, Liu, Zhiwei, Zhou, Wenhao, Wang, Huijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6537
_version_ 1785019719684718592
author Huang, Zhongwen
Xiao, Feifan
Xiao, Hui
Lu, Yulan
Yang, Lin
Zhuang, Deyi
Chen, Liping
Wei, Qiufen
Jiang, Yinmo
Li, Gang
Wu, Bingbing
Liu, Zhiwei
Zhou, Wenhao
Wang, Huijun
author_facet Huang, Zhongwen
Xiao, Feifan
Xiao, Hui
Lu, Yulan
Yang, Lin
Zhuang, Deyi
Chen, Liping
Wei, Qiufen
Jiang, Yinmo
Li, Gang
Wu, Bingbing
Liu, Zhiwei
Zhou, Wenhao
Wang, Huijun
author_sort Huang, Zhongwen
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: A growing number of children are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, there is a lack of studies systematically analyzing the genetic landscape of live-born children conceived through ART who need intensive care in the neonatal period. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and type of molecular defects among neonates conceived through ART who are in intensive care units (NICUs) with suspected genetic conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the China Neonatal Genomes Project, a multicenter national neonatal genome data set managed by the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. All participants were from level III and IV NICUs and included 535 neonates conceived through ART with suspected genetic conditions, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, and 1316 naturally conceived neonates with suspected genetic conditions in the same clinical settings, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The data were analyzed between September 2021 and January 2023. EXPOSURES: Whole-exome sequencing or target clinical exome sequencing with pathogenic or likely pathogenic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy number variation (CNV) detection was performed for each individual. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the molecular diagnostic yield, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and incidence of de novo variants. RESULTS: A total of 535 neonates conceived through ART (319 boys [59.6%]) and 1316 naturally conceived neonates (772 boys [58.7%]) were included. A genetic diagnosis was established for 54 patients conceived through ART (10.1%), including 34 patients with SNVs (63.0%) and 20 with CNVs (37.0%). In the non-ART group, 174 patients (13.2%) received a genetic diagnosis, including 120 patients with SNVs (69.0%) and 54 with CNVs (31.0%). The overall diagnostic yield was comparable between the ART group and the naturally conceived neonates (10.1% vs 13.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02), as was the proportion of SNVs (63.0% vs 69.0%; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00) and CNVs (37.0% vs 31.0%; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54-1.53) detected by sequencing. Furthermore, the proportions of de novo variants in the ART group and the non-ART group were similar (75.9% [41 of 54] vs 64.4% [112 of 174]; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.62-1.30). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cross-sectional study of neonates in NICUs suggests that the overall genetic diagnostic yield and the incidence of de novo variants were similar between live-born neonates conceived through ART and naturally conceived neonates in the same settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10074225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100742252023-04-06 Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology Huang, Zhongwen Xiao, Feifan Xiao, Hui Lu, Yulan Yang, Lin Zhuang, Deyi Chen, Liping Wei, Qiufen Jiang, Yinmo Li, Gang Wu, Bingbing Liu, Zhiwei Zhou, Wenhao Wang, Huijun JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: A growing number of children are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, there is a lack of studies systematically analyzing the genetic landscape of live-born children conceived through ART who need intensive care in the neonatal period. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and type of molecular defects among neonates conceived through ART who are in intensive care units (NICUs) with suspected genetic conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the China Neonatal Genomes Project, a multicenter national neonatal genome data set managed by the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. All participants were from level III and IV NICUs and included 535 neonates conceived through ART with suspected genetic conditions, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, and 1316 naturally conceived neonates with suspected genetic conditions in the same clinical settings, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The data were analyzed between September 2021 and January 2023. EXPOSURES: Whole-exome sequencing or target clinical exome sequencing with pathogenic or likely pathogenic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy number variation (CNV) detection was performed for each individual. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the molecular diagnostic yield, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and incidence of de novo variants. RESULTS: A total of 535 neonates conceived through ART (319 boys [59.6%]) and 1316 naturally conceived neonates (772 boys [58.7%]) were included. A genetic diagnosis was established for 54 patients conceived through ART (10.1%), including 34 patients with SNVs (63.0%) and 20 with CNVs (37.0%). In the non-ART group, 174 patients (13.2%) received a genetic diagnosis, including 120 patients with SNVs (69.0%) and 54 with CNVs (31.0%). The overall diagnostic yield was comparable between the ART group and the naturally conceived neonates (10.1% vs 13.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02), as was the proportion of SNVs (63.0% vs 69.0%; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00) and CNVs (37.0% vs 31.0%; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54-1.53) detected by sequencing. Furthermore, the proportions of de novo variants in the ART group and the non-ART group were similar (75.9% [41 of 54] vs 64.4% [112 of 174]; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.62-1.30). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cross-sectional study of neonates in NICUs suggests that the overall genetic diagnostic yield and the incidence of de novo variants were similar between live-born neonates conceived through ART and naturally conceived neonates in the same settings. American Medical Association 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10074225/ /pubmed/37014641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6537 Text en Copyright 2023 Huang Z et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Huang, Zhongwen
Xiao, Feifan
Xiao, Hui
Lu, Yulan
Yang, Lin
Zhuang, Deyi
Chen, Liping
Wei, Qiufen
Jiang, Yinmo
Li, Gang
Wu, Bingbing
Liu, Zhiwei
Zhou, Wenhao
Wang, Huijun
Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
title Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_full Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_fullStr Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_short Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_sort comparison of genetic profiles of neonates in intensive care units conceived with or without assisted reproductive technology
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6537
work_keys_str_mv AT huangzhongwen comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT xiaofeifan comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT xiaohui comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT luyulan comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT yanglin comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT zhuangdeyi comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT chenliping comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT weiqiufen comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT jiangyinmo comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT ligang comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT wubingbing comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT liuzhiwei comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT zhouwenhao comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology
AT wanghuijun comparisonofgeneticprofilesofneonatesinintensivecareunitsconceivedwithorwithoutassistedreproductivetechnology