Cargando…

Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth consultations by telephone and video around the world. While telehealth can improve access to primary health care, there are significant gaps in our understanding about how, when and to what extent telehealth should be used. This pape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathew, Supriya, Fitts, Michelle S., Liddle, Zania, Bourke, Lisa, Campbell, Narelle, Murakami-Gold, Lorna, Russell, Deborah J, Humphreys, John S., Mullholand, Edward, Zhao, Yuejen, Jones, Michael P., Boffa, John, Ramjan, Mark, Tangey, Annie, Schultz, Rosalie, Wakerman, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2
_version_ 1785019745932673024
author Mathew, Supriya
Fitts, Michelle S.
Liddle, Zania
Bourke, Lisa
Campbell, Narelle
Murakami-Gold, Lorna
Russell, Deborah J
Humphreys, John S.
Mullholand, Edward
Zhao, Yuejen
Jones, Michael P.
Boffa, John
Ramjan, Mark
Tangey, Annie
Schultz, Rosalie
Wakerman, John
author_facet Mathew, Supriya
Fitts, Michelle S.
Liddle, Zania
Bourke, Lisa
Campbell, Narelle
Murakami-Gold, Lorna
Russell, Deborah J
Humphreys, John S.
Mullholand, Edward
Zhao, Yuejen
Jones, Michael P.
Boffa, John
Ramjan, Mark
Tangey, Annie
Schultz, Rosalie
Wakerman, John
author_sort Mathew, Supriya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth consultations by telephone and video around the world. While telehealth can improve access to primary health care, there are significant gaps in our understanding about how, when and to what extent telehealth should be used. This paper explores the perspectives of health care staff on the key elements relating to the effective use of telehealth for patients living in remote Australia. METHODS: Between February 2020 and October 2021, interviews and discussion groups were conducted with 248 clinic staff from 20 different remote communities across northern Australia. Interview coding followed an inductive approach. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into common themes. RESULTS: Reduced need to travel for telehealth consultations was perceived to benefit both health providers and patients. Telehealth functioned best when there was a pre-established relationship between the patient and the health care provider and with patients who had good knowledge of their personal health, spoke English and had access to and familiarity with digital technology. On the other hand, telehealth was thought to be resource intensive, increasing remote clinic staff workload as most patients needed clinic staff to facilitate the telehealth session and complete background administrative work to support the consultation and an interpreter for translation services. Clinic staff universally emphasised that telehealth is a useful supplementary tool, and not a stand-alone service model replacing face-to-face interactions. CONCLUSION: Telehealth has the potential to improve access to healthcare in remote areas if complemented with adequate face-to-face services. Careful workforce planning is required while introducing telehealth into clinics that already face high staff shortages. Digital infrastructure with reliable internet connections with sufficient speed and latency need to be available at affordable prices in remote communities to make full use of telehealth consultations. Training and employment of local Aboriginal staff as digital navigators could ensure a culturally safe clinical environment for telehealth consultations and promote the effective use of telehealth services among community members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10074370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100743702023-04-05 Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? Mathew, Supriya Fitts, Michelle S. Liddle, Zania Bourke, Lisa Campbell, Narelle Murakami-Gold, Lorna Russell, Deborah J Humphreys, John S. Mullholand, Edward Zhao, Yuejen Jones, Michael P. Boffa, John Ramjan, Mark Tangey, Annie Schultz, Rosalie Wakerman, John BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth consultations by telephone and video around the world. While telehealth can improve access to primary health care, there are significant gaps in our understanding about how, when and to what extent telehealth should be used. This paper explores the perspectives of health care staff on the key elements relating to the effective use of telehealth for patients living in remote Australia. METHODS: Between February 2020 and October 2021, interviews and discussion groups were conducted with 248 clinic staff from 20 different remote communities across northern Australia. Interview coding followed an inductive approach. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into common themes. RESULTS: Reduced need to travel for telehealth consultations was perceived to benefit both health providers and patients. Telehealth functioned best when there was a pre-established relationship between the patient and the health care provider and with patients who had good knowledge of their personal health, spoke English and had access to and familiarity with digital technology. On the other hand, telehealth was thought to be resource intensive, increasing remote clinic staff workload as most patients needed clinic staff to facilitate the telehealth session and complete background administrative work to support the consultation and an interpreter for translation services. Clinic staff universally emphasised that telehealth is a useful supplementary tool, and not a stand-alone service model replacing face-to-face interactions. CONCLUSION: Telehealth has the potential to improve access to healthcare in remote areas if complemented with adequate face-to-face services. Careful workforce planning is required while introducing telehealth into clinics that already face high staff shortages. Digital infrastructure with reliable internet connections with sufficient speed and latency need to be available at affordable prices in remote communities to make full use of telehealth consultations. Training and employment of local Aboriginal staff as digital navigators could ensure a culturally safe clinical environment for telehealth consultations and promote the effective use of telehealth services among community members. BioMed Central 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10074370/ /pubmed/37020234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mathew, Supriya
Fitts, Michelle S.
Liddle, Zania
Bourke, Lisa
Campbell, Narelle
Murakami-Gold, Lorna
Russell, Deborah J
Humphreys, John S.
Mullholand, Edward
Zhao, Yuejen
Jones, Michael P.
Boffa, John
Ramjan, Mark
Tangey, Annie
Schultz, Rosalie
Wakerman, John
Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
title Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
title_full Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
title_fullStr Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
title_short Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
title_sort telehealth in remote australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewsupriya telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT fittsmichelles telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT liddlezania telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT bourkelisa telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT campbellnarelle telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT murakamigoldlorna telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT russelldeborahj telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT humphreysjohns telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT mullholandedward telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT zhaoyuejen telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT jonesmichaelp telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT boffajohn telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT ramjanmark telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT tangeyannie telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT schultzrosalie telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations
AT wakermanjohn telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations