Cargando…
Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth consultations by telephone and video around the world. While telehealth can improve access to primary health care, there are significant gaps in our understanding about how, when and to what extent telehealth should be used. This pape...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2 |
_version_ | 1785019745932673024 |
---|---|
author | Mathew, Supriya Fitts, Michelle S. Liddle, Zania Bourke, Lisa Campbell, Narelle Murakami-Gold, Lorna Russell, Deborah J Humphreys, John S. Mullholand, Edward Zhao, Yuejen Jones, Michael P. Boffa, John Ramjan, Mark Tangey, Annie Schultz, Rosalie Wakerman, John |
author_facet | Mathew, Supriya Fitts, Michelle S. Liddle, Zania Bourke, Lisa Campbell, Narelle Murakami-Gold, Lorna Russell, Deborah J Humphreys, John S. Mullholand, Edward Zhao, Yuejen Jones, Michael P. Boffa, John Ramjan, Mark Tangey, Annie Schultz, Rosalie Wakerman, John |
author_sort | Mathew, Supriya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth consultations by telephone and video around the world. While telehealth can improve access to primary health care, there are significant gaps in our understanding about how, when and to what extent telehealth should be used. This paper explores the perspectives of health care staff on the key elements relating to the effective use of telehealth for patients living in remote Australia. METHODS: Between February 2020 and October 2021, interviews and discussion groups were conducted with 248 clinic staff from 20 different remote communities across northern Australia. Interview coding followed an inductive approach. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into common themes. RESULTS: Reduced need to travel for telehealth consultations was perceived to benefit both health providers and patients. Telehealth functioned best when there was a pre-established relationship between the patient and the health care provider and with patients who had good knowledge of their personal health, spoke English and had access to and familiarity with digital technology. On the other hand, telehealth was thought to be resource intensive, increasing remote clinic staff workload as most patients needed clinic staff to facilitate the telehealth session and complete background administrative work to support the consultation and an interpreter for translation services. Clinic staff universally emphasised that telehealth is a useful supplementary tool, and not a stand-alone service model replacing face-to-face interactions. CONCLUSION: Telehealth has the potential to improve access to healthcare in remote areas if complemented with adequate face-to-face services. Careful workforce planning is required while introducing telehealth into clinics that already face high staff shortages. Digital infrastructure with reliable internet connections with sufficient speed and latency need to be available at affordable prices in remote communities to make full use of telehealth consultations. Training and employment of local Aboriginal staff as digital navigators could ensure a culturally safe clinical environment for telehealth consultations and promote the effective use of telehealth services among community members. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10074370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100743702023-04-05 Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? Mathew, Supriya Fitts, Michelle S. Liddle, Zania Bourke, Lisa Campbell, Narelle Murakami-Gold, Lorna Russell, Deborah J Humphreys, John S. Mullholand, Edward Zhao, Yuejen Jones, Michael P. Boffa, John Ramjan, Mark Tangey, Annie Schultz, Rosalie Wakerman, John BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth consultations by telephone and video around the world. While telehealth can improve access to primary health care, there are significant gaps in our understanding about how, when and to what extent telehealth should be used. This paper explores the perspectives of health care staff on the key elements relating to the effective use of telehealth for patients living in remote Australia. METHODS: Between February 2020 and October 2021, interviews and discussion groups were conducted with 248 clinic staff from 20 different remote communities across northern Australia. Interview coding followed an inductive approach. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into common themes. RESULTS: Reduced need to travel for telehealth consultations was perceived to benefit both health providers and patients. Telehealth functioned best when there was a pre-established relationship between the patient and the health care provider and with patients who had good knowledge of their personal health, spoke English and had access to and familiarity with digital technology. On the other hand, telehealth was thought to be resource intensive, increasing remote clinic staff workload as most patients needed clinic staff to facilitate the telehealth session and complete background administrative work to support the consultation and an interpreter for translation services. Clinic staff universally emphasised that telehealth is a useful supplementary tool, and not a stand-alone service model replacing face-to-face interactions. CONCLUSION: Telehealth has the potential to improve access to healthcare in remote areas if complemented with adequate face-to-face services. Careful workforce planning is required while introducing telehealth into clinics that already face high staff shortages. Digital infrastructure with reliable internet connections with sufficient speed and latency need to be available at affordable prices in remote communities to make full use of telehealth consultations. Training and employment of local Aboriginal staff as digital navigators could ensure a culturally safe clinical environment for telehealth consultations and promote the effective use of telehealth services among community members. BioMed Central 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10074370/ /pubmed/37020234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mathew, Supriya Fitts, Michelle S. Liddle, Zania Bourke, Lisa Campbell, Narelle Murakami-Gold, Lorna Russell, Deborah J Humphreys, John S. Mullholand, Edward Zhao, Yuejen Jones, Michael P. Boffa, John Ramjan, Mark Tangey, Annie Schultz, Rosalie Wakerman, John Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
title | Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
title_full | Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
title_fullStr | Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
title_full_unstemmed | Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
title_short | Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
title_sort | telehealth in remote australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09265-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathewsupriya telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT fittsmichelles telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT liddlezania telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT bourkelisa telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT campbellnarelle telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT murakamigoldlorna telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT russelldeborahj telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT humphreysjohns telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT mullholandedward telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT zhaoyuejen telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT jonesmichaelp telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT boffajohn telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT ramjanmark telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT tangeyannie telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT schultzrosalie telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations AT wakermanjohn telehealthinremoteaustraliaasupplementarytooloranalternativemodelofcarereplacingfacetofaceconsultations |