Cargando…

Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: We conducted a large-scale meta-analysis and subgroup analysis to compare the effect of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with that of free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy on medication adherence. Methods: Studies published in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Qiran, Zhou, Jiting, Li, Hongchao, Wang, Luying, Wu, Yao, Ma, Aixia, Guan, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1156081
_version_ 1785019770314162176
author Wei, Qiran
Zhou, Jiting
Li, Hongchao
Wang, Luying
Wu, Yao
Ma, Aixia
Guan, Xin
author_facet Wei, Qiran
Zhou, Jiting
Li, Hongchao
Wang, Luying
Wu, Yao
Ma, Aixia
Guan, Xin
author_sort Wei, Qiran
collection PubMed
description Objective: We conducted a large-scale meta-analysis and subgroup analysis to compare the effect of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with that of free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy on medication adherence. Methods: Studies published in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Embase up to May 2022 were identified according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary assessed outcomes were the medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC). We investigated the probability of being adherent to the prescribed treatment (MPR or PDC ≥80%) or the average estimate of these two parameters. Studies reporting such results were included in this meta-analysis. The summary measures were reported as the risk ratio (RR) and the weighted mean difference (MD) with 95% of confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. The quality of the cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Of the 1,814 screened studies, 61 met the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of the results showed that compared to FEC, FDC significantly improved the medication compliance of patients by 1.29 times (95% CI:1.23–1.35, p < 0.00001). I(2) of 99% represent high heterogeneity across studies. The mean difference in medication adherence between FDC and FEC was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06–0.14, p < 0.00001) with an I(2) estimate of 100%. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies that reported adherence outcomes according to disease type, period of evaluation and compliance indicators. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to exclude the results of low-quality studies, as well as studies in which there was ambiguity in the method of calculating the estimator. Conclusion: Analysis of the assessed parameters for the intention-to-treat and subgroup populations suggests that FDC can improve adherence to treatment and its advantages over FEC may increase over time. Further research is needed to better understand how medical conditions affect the impact of reduced pill burden on adherence, particularly in diseases other than cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10074603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100746032023-04-06 Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis Wei, Qiran Zhou, Jiting Li, Hongchao Wang, Luying Wu, Yao Ma, Aixia Guan, Xin Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: We conducted a large-scale meta-analysis and subgroup analysis to compare the effect of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with that of free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy on medication adherence. Methods: Studies published in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Embase up to May 2022 were identified according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary assessed outcomes were the medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC). We investigated the probability of being adherent to the prescribed treatment (MPR or PDC ≥80%) or the average estimate of these two parameters. Studies reporting such results were included in this meta-analysis. The summary measures were reported as the risk ratio (RR) and the weighted mean difference (MD) with 95% of confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. The quality of the cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Of the 1,814 screened studies, 61 met the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of the results showed that compared to FEC, FDC significantly improved the medication compliance of patients by 1.29 times (95% CI:1.23–1.35, p < 0.00001). I(2) of 99% represent high heterogeneity across studies. The mean difference in medication adherence between FDC and FEC was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06–0.14, p < 0.00001) with an I(2) estimate of 100%. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies that reported adherence outcomes according to disease type, period of evaluation and compliance indicators. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to exclude the results of low-quality studies, as well as studies in which there was ambiguity in the method of calculating the estimator. Conclusion: Analysis of the assessed parameters for the intention-to-treat and subgroup populations suggests that FDC can improve adherence to treatment and its advantages over FEC may increase over time. Further research is needed to better understand how medical conditions affect the impact of reduced pill burden on adherence, particularly in diseases other than cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10074603/ /pubmed/37033611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1156081 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wei, Zhou, Li, Wang, Wu, Ma and Guan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Wei, Qiran
Zhou, Jiting
Li, Hongchao
Wang, Luying
Wu, Yao
Ma, Aixia
Guan, Xin
Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1156081
work_keys_str_mv AT weiqiran medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhoujiting medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihongchao medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangluying medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuyao medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maaixia medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guanxin medicationadherencewithfixeddoseversusfreeequivalentcombinationtherapiessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis