Cargando…

‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Voluntary and community sector bereavement services are central to bereavement support in the UK. AIM: To determine service providers’ perspectives on access to their support before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods study using an explanatory sequential design: (1)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selman, Lucy E, Sutton, Eileen, Medeiros Mirra, Renata, Stone, Tracey, Gilbert, Emma, Rolston, Yansie, Murray, Karl, Longo, Mirella, Seddon, Kathy, Penny, Alison, Mayland, Catriona R, Wakefield, Donna, Byrne, Anthony, Harrop, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36337051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163221133665
_version_ 1785019802500202496
author Selman, Lucy E
Sutton, Eileen
Medeiros Mirra, Renata
Stone, Tracey
Gilbert, Emma
Rolston, Yansie
Murray, Karl
Longo, Mirella
Seddon, Kathy
Penny, Alison
Mayland, Catriona R
Wakefield, Donna
Byrne, Anthony
Harrop, Emily
author_facet Selman, Lucy E
Sutton, Eileen
Medeiros Mirra, Renata
Stone, Tracey
Gilbert, Emma
Rolston, Yansie
Murray, Karl
Longo, Mirella
Seddon, Kathy
Penny, Alison
Mayland, Catriona R
Wakefield, Donna
Byrne, Anthony
Harrop, Emily
author_sort Selman, Lucy E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Voluntary and community sector bereavement services are central to bereavement support in the UK. AIM: To determine service providers’ perspectives on access to their support before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods study using an explanatory sequential design: (1) Cross-sectional online survey of UK bereavement services; (2) Qualitative interviews with staff and volunteers at selected services. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: 147 services participated in the survey; 24 interviews were conducted across 14 services. RESULTS: 67.3% of services reported there were groups with unmet needs not accessing their services before the pandemic; most frequently people from minoritised ethnic communities (49%), sexual minority groups (26.5%), deprived areas (24.5%) and men (23.8%). Compared with before the pandemic, 3.4% of services were seeing more people from minoritised ethnic groups, while 6.1% were seeing fewer. 25.2% of services did not collect ethnicity data. Qualitative findings demonstrated the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on minoritised ethnic communities, including disruption to care/mourning practices, and the need for culturally appropriate support. During the pandemic outreach activities were sometimes deprioritised; however, increased collaboration was also reported. Online provision improved access but excluded some. Positive interventions to increase equity included collecting client demographic data; improving outreach, language accessibility and staff representation; supporting other professionals to provide bereavement support; local collaboration and co-production. CONCLUSIONS: Service providers report inequities in access to bereavement support. Attention needs to be paid to identifying, assessing and meeting unmet needs for appropriate bereavement support. Identified positive interventions can inform service provision and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10074747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100747472023-04-06 ‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study Selman, Lucy E Sutton, Eileen Medeiros Mirra, Renata Stone, Tracey Gilbert, Emma Rolston, Yansie Murray, Karl Longo, Mirella Seddon, Kathy Penny, Alison Mayland, Catriona R Wakefield, Donna Byrne, Anthony Harrop, Emily Palliat Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Voluntary and community sector bereavement services are central to bereavement support in the UK. AIM: To determine service providers’ perspectives on access to their support before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods study using an explanatory sequential design: (1) Cross-sectional online survey of UK bereavement services; (2) Qualitative interviews with staff and volunteers at selected services. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: 147 services participated in the survey; 24 interviews were conducted across 14 services. RESULTS: 67.3% of services reported there were groups with unmet needs not accessing their services before the pandemic; most frequently people from minoritised ethnic communities (49%), sexual minority groups (26.5%), deprived areas (24.5%) and men (23.8%). Compared with before the pandemic, 3.4% of services were seeing more people from minoritised ethnic groups, while 6.1% were seeing fewer. 25.2% of services did not collect ethnicity data. Qualitative findings demonstrated the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on minoritised ethnic communities, including disruption to care/mourning practices, and the need for culturally appropriate support. During the pandemic outreach activities were sometimes deprioritised; however, increased collaboration was also reported. Online provision improved access but excluded some. Positive interventions to increase equity included collecting client demographic data; improving outreach, language accessibility and staff representation; supporting other professionals to provide bereavement support; local collaboration and co-production. CONCLUSIONS: Service providers report inequities in access to bereavement support. Attention needs to be paid to identifying, assessing and meeting unmet needs for appropriate bereavement support. Identified positive interventions can inform service provision and research. SAGE Publications 2022-11-06 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10074747/ /pubmed/36337051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163221133665 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Selman, Lucy E
Sutton, Eileen
Medeiros Mirra, Renata
Stone, Tracey
Gilbert, Emma
Rolston, Yansie
Murray, Karl
Longo, Mirella
Seddon, Kathy
Penny, Alison
Mayland, Catriona R
Wakefield, Donna
Byrne, Anthony
Harrop, Emily
‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study
title ‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study
title_full ‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study
title_fullStr ‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed ‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study
title_short ‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study
title_sort ‘sadly i think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – inequities in access to bereavement support: findings from a mixed methods study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36337051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163221133665
work_keys_str_mv AT selmanlucye sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT suttoneileen sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT medeirosmirrarenata sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT stonetracey sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT gilbertemma sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT rolstonyansie sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT murraykarl sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT longomirella sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT seddonkathy sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT pennyalison sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT maylandcatrionar sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT wakefielddonna sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT byrneanthony sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT harropemily sadlyithinkwearesortofstillquitewhitemiddleclassreallyinequitiesinaccesstobereavementsupportfindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy