Cargando…
Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients’ factors for example, body mass index and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2 |
_version_ | 1785019813527027712 |
---|---|
author | Yuki, Hideo Ohkubo, Naoya Kurashina, Ryo Sakamoto, Kazumasa Suzuki, Issei Takei, Kohei Betsunoh, Hironori Nukui, Akinori Yashi, Masahiro Kamai, Takao |
author_facet | Yuki, Hideo Ohkubo, Naoya Kurashina, Ryo Sakamoto, Kazumasa Suzuki, Issei Takei, Kohei Betsunoh, Hironori Nukui, Akinori Yashi, Masahiro Kamai, Takao |
author_sort | Yuki, Hideo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients’ factors for example, body mass index and so on? This study aimed to determine the feasible surgical method for managing urachal remnants and presents the operative outcomes of our cases in relation to the findings from the existing literature. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; age range, 19–48 years) who underwent surgery for urachal remnants between January 2013 and March 2019 at our institution. RESULTS: In our cases, all urachal remnants were urachal sinuses, and the primary complaints were umbilical pain and pus discharge. Most of these symptoms were controlled using umbilical drainage and oral antibiotic intake; however, incisional drainage was required in two cases. In all cases, we performed a laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnants; one patient underwent an open conversion due to a very thick abdominal wall. Therefore, “peri-umbilical distanse” was proposed as an index to verify the periumbilical abdominal wall thickness. This index may clear the difficulties of the laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnunts. A postoperative complication—local infection that was treated using re-suturing—was observed in one patient. No adverse events occurred in the other cases. Our method was appropriate because it allowed for complete urachal resection with good cosmetic results, i.e., a small and natural scar appearance. Additionally, if bladder injury occurred, bladder re-suturing was easily possible because of the laparoscopic port’s position. CONCLUSIONS: We present an feasible method for laparoscopic urachal resection. This method may be recommended for young patients with an peri-umbilical distanse of < 2 cm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10074811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100748112023-04-06 Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method Yuki, Hideo Ohkubo, Naoya Kurashina, Ryo Sakamoto, Kazumasa Suzuki, Issei Takei, Kohei Betsunoh, Hironori Nukui, Akinori Yashi, Masahiro Kamai, Takao BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients’ factors for example, body mass index and so on? This study aimed to determine the feasible surgical method for managing urachal remnants and presents the operative outcomes of our cases in relation to the findings from the existing literature. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; age range, 19–48 years) who underwent surgery for urachal remnants between January 2013 and March 2019 at our institution. RESULTS: In our cases, all urachal remnants were urachal sinuses, and the primary complaints were umbilical pain and pus discharge. Most of these symptoms were controlled using umbilical drainage and oral antibiotic intake; however, incisional drainage was required in two cases. In all cases, we performed a laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnants; one patient underwent an open conversion due to a very thick abdominal wall. Therefore, “peri-umbilical distanse” was proposed as an index to verify the periumbilical abdominal wall thickness. This index may clear the difficulties of the laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnunts. A postoperative complication—local infection that was treated using re-suturing—was observed in one patient. No adverse events occurred in the other cases. Our method was appropriate because it allowed for complete urachal resection with good cosmetic results, i.e., a small and natural scar appearance. Additionally, if bladder injury occurred, bladder re-suturing was easily possible because of the laparoscopic port’s position. CONCLUSIONS: We present an feasible method for laparoscopic urachal resection. This method may be recommended for young patients with an peri-umbilical distanse of < 2 cm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2. BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10074811/ /pubmed/37016347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yuki, Hideo Ohkubo, Naoya Kurashina, Ryo Sakamoto, Kazumasa Suzuki, Issei Takei, Kohei Betsunoh, Hironori Nukui, Akinori Yashi, Masahiro Kamai, Takao Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
title | Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
title_full | Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
title_fullStr | Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
title_full_unstemmed | Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
title_short | Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
title_sort | transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yukihideo transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT ohkubonaoya transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT kurashinaryo transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT sakamotokazumasa transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT suzukiissei transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT takeikohei transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT betsunohhironori transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT nukuiakinori transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT yashimasahiro transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod AT kamaitakao transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod |