Cargando…

Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method

BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients’ factors for example, body mass index and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuki, Hideo, Ohkubo, Naoya, Kurashina, Ryo, Sakamoto, Kazumasa, Suzuki, Issei, Takei, Kohei, Betsunoh, Hironori, Nukui, Akinori, Yashi, Masahiro, Kamai, Takao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2
_version_ 1785019813527027712
author Yuki, Hideo
Ohkubo, Naoya
Kurashina, Ryo
Sakamoto, Kazumasa
Suzuki, Issei
Takei, Kohei
Betsunoh, Hironori
Nukui, Akinori
Yashi, Masahiro
Kamai, Takao
author_facet Yuki, Hideo
Ohkubo, Naoya
Kurashina, Ryo
Sakamoto, Kazumasa
Suzuki, Issei
Takei, Kohei
Betsunoh, Hironori
Nukui, Akinori
Yashi, Masahiro
Kamai, Takao
author_sort Yuki, Hideo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients’ factors for example, body mass index and so on? This study aimed to determine the feasible surgical method for managing urachal remnants and presents the operative outcomes of our cases in relation to the findings from the existing literature. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; age range, 19–48 years) who underwent surgery for urachal remnants between January 2013 and March 2019 at our institution. RESULTS: In our cases, all urachal remnants were urachal sinuses, and the primary complaints were umbilical pain and pus discharge. Most of these symptoms were controlled using umbilical drainage and oral antibiotic intake; however, incisional drainage was required in two cases. In all cases, we performed a laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnants; one patient underwent an open conversion due to a very thick abdominal wall. Therefore, “peri-umbilical distanse” was proposed as an index to verify the periumbilical abdominal wall thickness. This index may clear the difficulties of the laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnunts. A postoperative complication—local infection that was treated using re-suturing—was observed in one patient. No adverse events occurred in the other cases. Our method was appropriate because it allowed for complete urachal resection with good cosmetic results, i.e., a small and natural scar appearance. Additionally, if bladder injury occurred, bladder re-suturing was easily possible because of the laparoscopic port’s position. CONCLUSIONS: We present an feasible method for laparoscopic urachal resection. This method may be recommended for young patients with an peri-umbilical distanse of < 2 cm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10074811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100748112023-04-06 Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method Yuki, Hideo Ohkubo, Naoya Kurashina, Ryo Sakamoto, Kazumasa Suzuki, Issei Takei, Kohei Betsunoh, Hironori Nukui, Akinori Yashi, Masahiro Kamai, Takao BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: To date, there is no standard established laparoscopic surgical method for managing urachal remnants because of their rarity, and several questions remain unanswered. Are there any problems for considering the operative indications about patients’ factors for example, body mass index and so on? This study aimed to determine the feasible surgical method for managing urachal remnants and presents the operative outcomes of our cases in relation to the findings from the existing literature. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; age range, 19–48 years) who underwent surgery for urachal remnants between January 2013 and March 2019 at our institution. RESULTS: In our cases, all urachal remnants were urachal sinuses, and the primary complaints were umbilical pain and pus discharge. Most of these symptoms were controlled using umbilical drainage and oral antibiotic intake; however, incisional drainage was required in two cases. In all cases, we performed a laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnants; one patient underwent an open conversion due to a very thick abdominal wall. Therefore, “peri-umbilical distanse” was proposed as an index to verify the periumbilical abdominal wall thickness. This index may clear the difficulties of the laparoscopic resection of the urachal remnunts. A postoperative complication—local infection that was treated using re-suturing—was observed in one patient. No adverse events occurred in the other cases. Our method was appropriate because it allowed for complete urachal resection with good cosmetic results, i.e., a small and natural scar appearance. Additionally, if bladder injury occurred, bladder re-suturing was easily possible because of the laparoscopic port’s position. CONCLUSIONS: We present an feasible method for laparoscopic urachal resection. This method may be recommended for young patients with an peri-umbilical distanse of < 2 cm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2. BioMed Central 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10074811/ /pubmed/37016347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yuki, Hideo
Ohkubo, Naoya
Kurashina, Ryo
Sakamoto, Kazumasa
Suzuki, Issei
Takei, Kohei
Betsunoh, Hironori
Nukui, Akinori
Yashi, Masahiro
Kamai, Takao
Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
title Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
title_full Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
title_fullStr Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
title_full_unstemmed Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
title_short Transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
title_sort transperitoneal laparoscopic umbilical resection of urachal remnants: a feasible surgical method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01229-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yukihideo transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT ohkubonaoya transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT kurashinaryo transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT sakamotokazumasa transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT suzukiissei transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT takeikohei transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT betsunohhironori transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT nukuiakinori transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT yashimasahiro transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod
AT kamaitakao transperitoneallaparoscopicumbilicalresectionofurachalremnantsafeasiblesurgicalmethod