Cargando…
Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning
BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is an important complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Application of machine learning could potentially be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM. AIM: To apply machine learning to be us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.95 |
_version_ | 1785019829569191936 |
---|---|
author | Agasthi, Pradyumna Ashraf, Hasan Pujari, Sai Harika Girardo, Marlene Tseng, Andrew Mookadam, Farouk Venepally, Nithin Buras, Matthew R Abraham, Bishoy Khetarpal, Banveet K Allam, Mohamed MD, Siva K Mulpuru Eleid, Mackram F Greason, Kevin L Beohar, Nirat Sweeney, John Fortuin, David Holmes, David R Jr Arsanjani, Reza |
author_facet | Agasthi, Pradyumna Ashraf, Hasan Pujari, Sai Harika Girardo, Marlene Tseng, Andrew Mookadam, Farouk Venepally, Nithin Buras, Matthew R Abraham, Bishoy Khetarpal, Banveet K Allam, Mohamed MD, Siva K Mulpuru Eleid, Mackram F Greason, Kevin L Beohar, Nirat Sweeney, John Fortuin, David Holmes, David R Jr Arsanjani, Reza |
author_sort | Agasthi, Pradyumna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is an important complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Application of machine learning could potentially be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM. AIM: To apply machine learning to be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1200 patients who underwent TAVR (January 2014-December 2017) was performed. 964 patients without prior PPM were included for a 30-d analysis and 657 patients without PPM requirement through 30 d were included for a 1-year analysis. After the exclusion of variables with near-zero variance or ≥ 50% missing data, 167 variables were included in the random forest gradient boosting algorithm (GBM) optimized using 5-fold cross-validations repeated 10 times. The receiver operator curve (ROC) for the GBM model and PPM risk score models were calculated to predict the risk of PPM at 30 d and 1 year. RESULTS: Of 964 patients included in the 30-d analysis without prior PPM, 19.6% required PPM post-TAVR. The mean age of patients was 80.9 ± 8.7 years. 42.1 % were female. Of 657 patients included in the 1-year analysis, the mean age of the patients was 80.7 ± 8.2. Of those, 42.6% of patients were female and 26.7% required PPM at 1-year post-TAVR. The area under ROC to predict 30-d and 1-year risk of PPM for the GBM model (0.66 and 0.72) was superior to that of the PPM risk score (0.55 and 0.54) with a P value < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The GBM model has good discrimination and calibration in identifying patients at high risk of PPM post-TAVR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10074998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100749982023-04-06 Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning Agasthi, Pradyumna Ashraf, Hasan Pujari, Sai Harika Girardo, Marlene Tseng, Andrew Mookadam, Farouk Venepally, Nithin Buras, Matthew R Abraham, Bishoy Khetarpal, Banveet K Allam, Mohamed MD, Siva K Mulpuru Eleid, Mackram F Greason, Kevin L Beohar, Nirat Sweeney, John Fortuin, David Holmes, David R Jr Arsanjani, Reza World J Cardiol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is an important complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Application of machine learning could potentially be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM. AIM: To apply machine learning to be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1200 patients who underwent TAVR (January 2014-December 2017) was performed. 964 patients without prior PPM were included for a 30-d analysis and 657 patients without PPM requirement through 30 d were included for a 1-year analysis. After the exclusion of variables with near-zero variance or ≥ 50% missing data, 167 variables were included in the random forest gradient boosting algorithm (GBM) optimized using 5-fold cross-validations repeated 10 times. The receiver operator curve (ROC) for the GBM model and PPM risk score models were calculated to predict the risk of PPM at 30 d and 1 year. RESULTS: Of 964 patients included in the 30-d analysis without prior PPM, 19.6% required PPM post-TAVR. The mean age of patients was 80.9 ± 8.7 years. 42.1 % were female. Of 657 patients included in the 1-year analysis, the mean age of the patients was 80.7 ± 8.2. Of those, 42.6% of patients were female and 26.7% required PPM at 1-year post-TAVR. The area under ROC to predict 30-d and 1-year risk of PPM for the GBM model (0.66 and 0.72) was superior to that of the PPM risk score (0.55 and 0.54) with a P value < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The GBM model has good discrimination and calibration in identifying patients at high risk of PPM post-TAVR. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-03-26 2023-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10074998/ /pubmed/37033682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.95 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Agasthi, Pradyumna Ashraf, Hasan Pujari, Sai Harika Girardo, Marlene Tseng, Andrew Mookadam, Farouk Venepally, Nithin Buras, Matthew R Abraham, Bishoy Khetarpal, Banveet K Allam, Mohamed MD, Siva K Mulpuru Eleid, Mackram F Greason, Kevin L Beohar, Nirat Sweeney, John Fortuin, David Holmes, David R Jr Arsanjani, Reza Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning |
title | Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning |
title_full | Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning |
title_fullStr | Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning |
title_short | Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning |
title_sort | prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the role of machine learning |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.95 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agasthipradyumna predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT ashrafhasan predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT pujarisaiharika predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT girardomarlene predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT tsengandrew predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT mookadamfarouk predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT venepallynithin predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT burasmatthewr predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT abrahambishoy predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT khetarpalbanveetk predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT allammohamed predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT mdsivakmulpuru predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT eleidmackramf predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT greasonkevinl predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT beoharnirat predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT sweeneyjohn predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT fortuindavid predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT holmesdavidrjr predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning AT arsanjanireza predictionofpermanentpacemakerimplantationaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtheroleofmachinelearning |