Cargando…
A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2
Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37017810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04590-0 |
_version_ | 1785019867893596160 |
---|---|
author | Carbo, Ellen C. Mourik, Kees Boers, Stefan A. Munnink, Bas Oude Nieuwenhuijse, David Jonges, Marcel Welkers, Matthijs R. A. Matamoros, Sebastien van Harinxma thoe Slooten, Joost Kraakman, Margriet E. M. Karelioti, Evita van der Meer, David Veldkamp, Karin Ellen Kroes, Aloys C. M. Sidorov, Igor de Vries, Jutte J. C. |
author_facet | Carbo, Ellen C. Mourik, Kees Boers, Stefan A. Munnink, Bas Oude Nieuwenhuijse, David Jonges, Marcel Welkers, Matthijs R. A. Matamoros, Sebastien van Harinxma thoe Slooten, Joost Kraakman, Margriet E. M. Karelioti, Evita van der Meer, David Veldkamp, Karin Ellen Kroes, Aloys C. M. Sidorov, Igor de Vries, Jutte J. C. |
author_sort | Carbo, Ellen C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been developed over the last years, but cross-sequence technology benchmarking studies have been scarce. In the current study, 26 clinical samples were sequenced using five protocols: AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina), EasySeq RC-PCR SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina/NimaGen), Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Thermo Fisher), custom primer sets (Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)), and capture probe-based viral metagenomics (Roche/Illumina). Studied parameters included genome coverage, depth of coverage, amplicon distribution, and variant calling. The median SARS-CoV-2 genome coverage of samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values of 30 and lower ranged from 81.6 to 99.8% for, respectively, the ONT protocol and Illumina AmpliSeq protocol. Correlation of coverage with PCR Ct values varied per protocol. Amplicon distribution signatures differed across the methods, with peak differences of up to 4 log(10) at disbalanced positions in samples with high viral loads (Ct values ≤ 23). Phylogenetic analyses of consensus sequences showed clustering independent of the workflow used. The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 reads in relation to background sequences, as a (cost-)efficiency metric, was the highest for the EasySeq protocol. The hands-on time was the lowest when using EasySeq and ONT protocols, with the latter additionally having the shortest sequence runtime. In conclusion, the studied protocols differed on a variety of the studied metrics. This study provides data that assist laboratories when selecting protocols for their specific setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-023-04590-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10075175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100751752023-04-06 A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 Carbo, Ellen C. Mourik, Kees Boers, Stefan A. Munnink, Bas Oude Nieuwenhuijse, David Jonges, Marcel Welkers, Matthijs R. A. Matamoros, Sebastien van Harinxma thoe Slooten, Joost Kraakman, Margriet E. M. Karelioti, Evita van der Meer, David Veldkamp, Karin Ellen Kroes, Aloys C. M. Sidorov, Igor de Vries, Jutte J. C. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been developed over the last years, but cross-sequence technology benchmarking studies have been scarce. In the current study, 26 clinical samples were sequenced using five protocols: AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina), EasySeq RC-PCR SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina/NimaGen), Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Thermo Fisher), custom primer sets (Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)), and capture probe-based viral metagenomics (Roche/Illumina). Studied parameters included genome coverage, depth of coverage, amplicon distribution, and variant calling. The median SARS-CoV-2 genome coverage of samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values of 30 and lower ranged from 81.6 to 99.8% for, respectively, the ONT protocol and Illumina AmpliSeq protocol. Correlation of coverage with PCR Ct values varied per protocol. Amplicon distribution signatures differed across the methods, with peak differences of up to 4 log(10) at disbalanced positions in samples with high viral loads (Ct values ≤ 23). Phylogenetic analyses of consensus sequences showed clustering independent of the workflow used. The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 reads in relation to background sequences, as a (cost-)efficiency metric, was the highest for the EasySeq protocol. The hands-on time was the lowest when using EasySeq and ONT protocols, with the latter additionally having the shortest sequence runtime. In conclusion, the studied protocols differed on a variety of the studied metrics. This study provides data that assist laboratories when selecting protocols for their specific setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-023-04590-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10075175/ /pubmed/37017810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04590-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Carbo, Ellen C. Mourik, Kees Boers, Stefan A. Munnink, Bas Oude Nieuwenhuijse, David Jonges, Marcel Welkers, Matthijs R. A. Matamoros, Sebastien van Harinxma thoe Slooten, Joost Kraakman, Margriet E. M. Karelioti, Evita van der Meer, David Veldkamp, Karin Ellen Kroes, Aloys C. M. Sidorov, Igor de Vries, Jutte J. C. A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 |
title | A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | comparison of five illumina, ion torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of sars-cov-2 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37017810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04590-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carboellenc acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT mourikkees acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT boersstefana acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT munninkbasoude acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT nieuwenhuijsedavid acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT jongesmarcel acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT welkersmatthijsra acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT matamorossebastien acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT vanharinxmathoeslootenjoost acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT kraakmanmargrietem acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT kareliotievita acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT vandermeerdavid acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT veldkampkarinellen acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT kroesaloyscm acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT sidorovigor acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT devriesjuttejc acomparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT carboellenc comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT mourikkees comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT boersstefana comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT munninkbasoude comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT nieuwenhuijsedavid comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT jongesmarcel comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT welkersmatthijsra comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT matamorossebastien comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT vanharinxmathoeslootenjoost comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT kraakmanmargrietem comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT kareliotievita comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT vandermeerdavid comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT veldkampkarinellen comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT kroesaloyscm comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT sidorovigor comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 AT devriesjuttejc comparisonoffiveilluminaiontorrentandnanoporesequencingtechnologybasedapproachesforwholegenomesequencingofsarscov2 |