Cargando…
Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified fro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1790 |
_version_ | 1785019893486190592 |
---|---|
author | Berlin, Ian Geddes Jennings, Charity Conlin Shin, Spencer Kenealey, Jason |
author_facet | Berlin, Ian Geddes Jennings, Charity Conlin Shin, Spencer Kenealey, Jason |
author_sort | Berlin, Ian Geddes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) remedies often containing multiple bioactive compounds. However, in vitro studies frequently focus on the compounds in isolation. AIM: We used mixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM) to assess changes in PC cell viability after 48 h of treatment to identify the optimal mixture of all 35 three‐compound combinations of seven bioactive compounds from TCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used berberine, wogonin, shikonin, curcumin, triptolide, emodin, and silybin to treat PC3 and LNCaP human PC cells at their IC50 concentrations that we calculated. These compounds modulate many chemotherapeutic pathways including intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, increasing reactive oxygen species, decreasing metastatic pathways, inhibiting cell cycle progression. We hypothesize that because these compounds bind to unique molecular targets to activate different chemotherapeutic pathways, they will act synergistically to decrease tumor cell viability. Results from MDRSM showed that two‐way combinations were more effective than three‐way or single compounds. Most notably wogonin, silybin, emodin and berberine responded well in two‐compound combinations with each other in PC3 and LNCaP cells. We then conducted cell viability tests combining two bioactive compound ratios with docetaxel (Doc) and found significant results within the LNCaP cell line. In particular, mixtures of berberine and wogonin, berberine and silybin, emodin and berberine, and emodin and silybin reduced LNCaP cell viability up to an average of 90.02%. The two‐compound combinations were significantly better than docetaxel treatment of LNCaP cells. CONCLUSION: Within the PC3 cells, we show that a combination of berberine, wogonin and docetaxel is just as effective as docetaxel alone. Thus, we provide new combination treatments that are highly effective in vitro for treating androgen‐dependent and androgen‐independent PC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10075293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100752932023-04-06 Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments Berlin, Ian Geddes Jennings, Charity Conlin Shin, Spencer Kenealey, Jason Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) remedies often containing multiple bioactive compounds. However, in vitro studies frequently focus on the compounds in isolation. AIM: We used mixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM) to assess changes in PC cell viability after 48 h of treatment to identify the optimal mixture of all 35 three‐compound combinations of seven bioactive compounds from TCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used berberine, wogonin, shikonin, curcumin, triptolide, emodin, and silybin to treat PC3 and LNCaP human PC cells at their IC50 concentrations that we calculated. These compounds modulate many chemotherapeutic pathways including intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, increasing reactive oxygen species, decreasing metastatic pathways, inhibiting cell cycle progression. We hypothesize that because these compounds bind to unique molecular targets to activate different chemotherapeutic pathways, they will act synergistically to decrease tumor cell viability. Results from MDRSM showed that two‐way combinations were more effective than three‐way or single compounds. Most notably wogonin, silybin, emodin and berberine responded well in two‐compound combinations with each other in PC3 and LNCaP cells. We then conducted cell viability tests combining two bioactive compound ratios with docetaxel (Doc) and found significant results within the LNCaP cell line. In particular, mixtures of berberine and wogonin, berberine and silybin, emodin and berberine, and emodin and silybin reduced LNCaP cell viability up to an average of 90.02%. The two‐compound combinations were significantly better than docetaxel treatment of LNCaP cells. CONCLUSION: Within the PC3 cells, we show that a combination of berberine, wogonin and docetaxel is just as effective as docetaxel alone. Thus, we provide new combination treatments that are highly effective in vitro for treating androgen‐dependent and androgen‐independent PC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10075293/ /pubmed/36772872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1790 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Berlin, Ian Geddes Jennings, Charity Conlin Shin, Spencer Kenealey, Jason Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
title | Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
title_full | Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
title_fullStr | Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
title_short | Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
title_sort | utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berliniangeddes utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments AT jenningscharityconlin utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments AT shinspencer utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments AT kenealeyjason utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments |