Cargando…

Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berlin, Ian Geddes, Jennings, Charity Conlin, Shin, Spencer, Kenealey, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1790
_version_ 1785019893486190592
author Berlin, Ian Geddes
Jennings, Charity Conlin
Shin, Spencer
Kenealey, Jason
author_facet Berlin, Ian Geddes
Jennings, Charity Conlin
Shin, Spencer
Kenealey, Jason
author_sort Berlin, Ian Geddes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) remedies often containing multiple bioactive compounds. However, in vitro studies frequently focus on the compounds in isolation. AIM: We used mixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM) to assess changes in PC cell viability after 48 h of treatment to identify the optimal mixture of all 35 three‐compound combinations of seven bioactive compounds from TCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used berberine, wogonin, shikonin, curcumin, triptolide, emodin, and silybin to treat PC3 and LNCaP human PC cells at their IC50 concentrations that we calculated. These compounds modulate many chemotherapeutic pathways including intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, increasing reactive oxygen species, decreasing metastatic pathways, inhibiting cell cycle progression. We hypothesize that because these compounds bind to unique molecular targets to activate different chemotherapeutic pathways, they will act synergistically to decrease tumor cell viability. Results from MDRSM showed that two‐way combinations were more effective than three‐way or single compounds. Most notably wogonin, silybin, emodin and berberine responded well in two‐compound combinations with each other in PC3 and LNCaP cells. We then conducted cell viability tests combining two bioactive compound ratios with docetaxel (Doc) and found significant results within the LNCaP cell line. In particular, mixtures of berberine and wogonin, berberine and silybin, emodin and berberine, and emodin and silybin reduced LNCaP cell viability up to an average of 90.02%. The two‐compound combinations were significantly better than docetaxel treatment of LNCaP cells. CONCLUSION: Within the PC3 cells, we show that a combination of berberine, wogonin and docetaxel is just as effective as docetaxel alone. Thus, we provide new combination treatments that are highly effective in vitro for treating androgen‐dependent and androgen‐independent PC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10075293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100752932023-04-06 Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments Berlin, Ian Geddes Jennings, Charity Conlin Shin, Spencer Kenealey, Jason Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) remedies often containing multiple bioactive compounds. However, in vitro studies frequently focus on the compounds in isolation. AIM: We used mixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM) to assess changes in PC cell viability after 48 h of treatment to identify the optimal mixture of all 35 three‐compound combinations of seven bioactive compounds from TCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used berberine, wogonin, shikonin, curcumin, triptolide, emodin, and silybin to treat PC3 and LNCaP human PC cells at their IC50 concentrations that we calculated. These compounds modulate many chemotherapeutic pathways including intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, increasing reactive oxygen species, decreasing metastatic pathways, inhibiting cell cycle progression. We hypothesize that because these compounds bind to unique molecular targets to activate different chemotherapeutic pathways, they will act synergistically to decrease tumor cell viability. Results from MDRSM showed that two‐way combinations were more effective than three‐way or single compounds. Most notably wogonin, silybin, emodin and berberine responded well in two‐compound combinations with each other in PC3 and LNCaP cells. We then conducted cell viability tests combining two bioactive compound ratios with docetaxel (Doc) and found significant results within the LNCaP cell line. In particular, mixtures of berberine and wogonin, berberine and silybin, emodin and berberine, and emodin and silybin reduced LNCaP cell viability up to an average of 90.02%. The two‐compound combinations were significantly better than docetaxel treatment of LNCaP cells. CONCLUSION: Within the PC3 cells, we show that a combination of berberine, wogonin and docetaxel is just as effective as docetaxel alone. Thus, we provide new combination treatments that are highly effective in vitro for treating androgen‐dependent and androgen‐independent PC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10075293/ /pubmed/36772872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1790 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Berlin, Ian Geddes
Jennings, Charity Conlin
Shin, Spencer
Kenealey, Jason
Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
title Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
title_full Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
title_fullStr Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
title_short Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
title_sort utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1790
work_keys_str_mv AT berliniangeddes utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments
AT jenningscharityconlin utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments
AT shinspencer utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments
AT kenealeyjason utilizingmixturedesignresponsesurfacemethodologytodetermineeffectivecombinationsofplantderivedcompoundsasprostatecancertreatments