Cargando…

Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis

Misinformation can continue to influence reasoning after correction; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Theoretical accounts of the CIE suggest failure of two cognitive processes to be causal, namely memory updating and suppression of misinformation reliance. Both processes can a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIlhiney, Paul, Gignac, Gilles E., Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Kennedy, Briana L., Weinborn, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283951
_version_ 1785019930528186368
author McIlhiney, Paul
Gignac, Gilles E.
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Kennedy, Briana L.
Weinborn, Michael
author_facet McIlhiney, Paul
Gignac, Gilles E.
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Kennedy, Briana L.
Weinborn, Michael
author_sort McIlhiney, Paul
collection PubMed
description Misinformation can continue to influence reasoning after correction; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Theoretical accounts of the CIE suggest failure of two cognitive processes to be causal, namely memory updating and suppression of misinformation reliance. Both processes can also be conceptualised as subcomponents of contemporary executive function (EF) models; specifically, working-memory updating and prepotent-response inhibition. EF may thus predict susceptibility to the CIE. The current study investigated whether individual differences in EF could predict individual differences in CIE susceptibility. Participants completed several measures of EF subcomponents, including those of updating and inhibition, as well as set shifting, and a standard CIE task. The relationship between EF and CIE was then assessed using a correlation analysis of the EF and CIE measures, as well as structural equation modelling of the EF-subcomponent latent variable and CIE latent variable. Results showed that EF can predict susceptibility to the CIE, especially the factor of working-memory updating. These results further our understanding of the CIE’s cognitive antecedents and provide potential directions for real-world CIE intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10075451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100754512023-04-06 Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis McIlhiney, Paul Gignac, Gilles E. Ecker, Ullrich K. H. Kennedy, Briana L. Weinborn, Michael PLoS One Research Article Misinformation can continue to influence reasoning after correction; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Theoretical accounts of the CIE suggest failure of two cognitive processes to be causal, namely memory updating and suppression of misinformation reliance. Both processes can also be conceptualised as subcomponents of contemporary executive function (EF) models; specifically, working-memory updating and prepotent-response inhibition. EF may thus predict susceptibility to the CIE. The current study investigated whether individual differences in EF could predict individual differences in CIE susceptibility. Participants completed several measures of EF subcomponents, including those of updating and inhibition, as well as set shifting, and a standard CIE task. The relationship between EF and CIE was then assessed using a correlation analysis of the EF and CIE measures, as well as structural equation modelling of the EF-subcomponent latent variable and CIE latent variable. Results showed that EF can predict susceptibility to the CIE, especially the factor of working-memory updating. These results further our understanding of the CIE’s cognitive antecedents and provide potential directions for real-world CIE intervention. Public Library of Science 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10075451/ /pubmed/37018324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283951 Text en © 2023 McIlhiney et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McIlhiney, Paul
Gignac, Gilles E.
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Kennedy, Briana L.
Weinborn, Michael
Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis
title Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis
title_full Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis
title_fullStr Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis
title_full_unstemmed Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis
title_short Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis
title_sort executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: a latent-variable analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283951
work_keys_str_mv AT mcilhineypaul executivefunctionandthecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformationalatentvariableanalysis
AT gignacgillese executivefunctionandthecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformationalatentvariableanalysis
AT eckerullrichkh executivefunctionandthecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformationalatentvariableanalysis
AT kennedybrianal executivefunctionandthecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformationalatentvariableanalysis
AT weinbornmichael executivefunctionandthecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformationalatentvariableanalysis