Cargando…

The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time

BACKGROUND: Modern lithium management guidelines were introduced to improve the renal prognosis of lithium patients. AIMS: To examine whether prospects for severe renal impairment (defined as chronic kidney disease at least stage 4 (CKD4)), in long-term lithium patients, have changed over time after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golic, Mihaela, Aiff, Harald, Attman, Per-Ola, Ramsauer, Bernd, Schön, Staffan, Steingrimsson, Steinn, Svedlund, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02698811221123054
_version_ 1785020109820002304
author Golic, Mihaela
Aiff, Harald
Attman, Per-Ola
Ramsauer, Bernd
Schön, Staffan
Steingrimsson, Steinn
Svedlund, Jan
author_facet Golic, Mihaela
Aiff, Harald
Attman, Per-Ola
Ramsauer, Bernd
Schön, Staffan
Steingrimsson, Steinn
Svedlund, Jan
author_sort Golic, Mihaela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modern lithium management guidelines were introduced to improve the renal prognosis of lithium patients. AIMS: To examine whether prospects for severe renal impairment (defined as chronic kidney disease at least stage 4 (CKD4)), in long-term lithium patients, have changed over time after the introduction of lithium monitoring guidelines. METHODS: The time to and hazard for CKD4 were compared between three patient cohorts who started long-term lithium in three consecutive decades: 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. The follow-up time was 10 years after completion of 1-year treatment. The data were collected from Sahlgrenska University Hospital’s laboratory database. RESULTS: In all, 2169 patients were included: 623 in Cohort 1 (started lithium during 1980s), 874 in Cohort 2 (1990s) and 672 in Cohort 3 (2000s). Compliance with lithium monitoring guidelines improved, and mean serum lithium decreased, through the cohorts. In all, 22 patients developed CKD4 during follow-up. The time to CKD4 was the same in all three cohorts (overall: 10.96 years, 95% confidence interval: 10.94–11 years). Age and serum creatinine concentration at start were significant risk factors, while sex had no prognostic value. After adjusting for the significant covariates, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazard for CKD4 between the three cohorts. CONCLUSION: The risk for severe renal damage during the first decade of long-term lithium is low, but has not changed over time. Our data suggest that improved compliance with lithium guidelines is not reflected in less risk for severe renal damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10076338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100763382023-04-07 The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time Golic, Mihaela Aiff, Harald Attman, Per-Ola Ramsauer, Bernd Schön, Staffan Steingrimsson, Steinn Svedlund, Jan J Psychopharmacol Original Papers BACKGROUND: Modern lithium management guidelines were introduced to improve the renal prognosis of lithium patients. AIMS: To examine whether prospects for severe renal impairment (defined as chronic kidney disease at least stage 4 (CKD4)), in long-term lithium patients, have changed over time after the introduction of lithium monitoring guidelines. METHODS: The time to and hazard for CKD4 were compared between three patient cohorts who started long-term lithium in three consecutive decades: 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. The follow-up time was 10 years after completion of 1-year treatment. The data were collected from Sahlgrenska University Hospital’s laboratory database. RESULTS: In all, 2169 patients were included: 623 in Cohort 1 (started lithium during 1980s), 874 in Cohort 2 (1990s) and 672 in Cohort 3 (2000s). Compliance with lithium monitoring guidelines improved, and mean serum lithium decreased, through the cohorts. In all, 22 patients developed CKD4 during follow-up. The time to CKD4 was the same in all three cohorts (overall: 10.96 years, 95% confidence interval: 10.94–11 years). Age and serum creatinine concentration at start were significant risk factors, while sex had no prognostic value. After adjusting for the significant covariates, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazard for CKD4 between the three cohorts. CONCLUSION: The risk for severe renal damage during the first decade of long-term lithium is low, but has not changed over time. Our data suggest that improved compliance with lithium guidelines is not reflected in less risk for severe renal damage. SAGE Publications 2022-09-19 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10076338/ /pubmed/36121029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02698811221123054 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Papers
Golic, Mihaela
Aiff, Harald
Attman, Per-Ola
Ramsauer, Bernd
Schön, Staffan
Steingrimsson, Steinn
Svedlund, Jan
The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
title The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
title_full The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
title_fullStr The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
title_full_unstemmed The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
title_short The low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
title_sort low risk for early renal damage during lithium treatment has not changed over time
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02698811221123054
work_keys_str_mv AT golicmihaela thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT aiffharald thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT attmanperola thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT ramsauerbernd thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT schonstaffan thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT steingrimssonsteinn thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT svedlundjan thelowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT golicmihaela lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT aiffharald lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT attmanperola lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT ramsauerbernd lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT schonstaffan lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT steingrimssonsteinn lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime
AT svedlundjan lowriskforearlyrenaldamageduringlithiumtreatmenthasnotchangedovertime