Cargando…

Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review

Robotically assisted operations are the state of the art in laparoscopic general surgery. They are established predominantly for elective operations. Since laparoscopy is widely used in urgent general surgery, the significance of robotic assistance in urgent operations is of interest. Currently, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinisch, Alexander, Liese, Juliane, Padberg, Winfried, Ulrich, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6
_version_ 1785020125326344192
author Reinisch, Alexander
Liese, Juliane
Padberg, Winfried
Ulrich, Frank
author_facet Reinisch, Alexander
Liese, Juliane
Padberg, Winfried
Ulrich, Frank
author_sort Reinisch, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Robotically assisted operations are the state of the art in laparoscopic general surgery. They are established predominantly for elective operations. Since laparoscopy is widely used in urgent general surgery, the significance of robotic assistance in urgent operations is of interest. Currently, there are few data on robotic-assisted operations in urgent surgery. The aim of this study was to collect and classify the existing studies. A two-stage, PRISMA-compliant literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted. We analyzed all articles on robotic surgery associated with urgent general surgery resp. acute surgical diseases of the abdomen. Gynecological and urological diseases so as vascular surgery, except mesenterial ischemia, were excluded. Studies and case reports/series published between 1980 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. In addition to a descriptive synopsis, various outcome parameters were systematically recorded. Fifty-two studies of operations for acute appendicitis and cholecystitis, hernias and acute conditions of the gastrointestinal tract were included. The level of evidence is low. Surgical robots in the narrow sense and robotic camera mounts were used. All narrow-sense robots are nonautonomous systems; in 82%, the Da Vinci(®) system was used. The most frequently published emergency operations were urgent cholecystectomies (30 studies, 703 patients) followed by incarcerated hernias (9 studies, 199 patients). Feasibility of robotic operations was demonstrated for all indications. Neither robotic-specific problems nor extensive complication rates were reported. Various urgent operations in general surgery can be performed robotically without increased risk. The available data do not allow a final evidence-based assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10076409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100764092023-04-07 Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review Reinisch, Alexander Liese, Juliane Padberg, Winfried Ulrich, Frank J Robot Surg Review Article Robotically assisted operations are the state of the art in laparoscopic general surgery. They are established predominantly for elective operations. Since laparoscopy is widely used in urgent general surgery, the significance of robotic assistance in urgent operations is of interest. Currently, there are few data on robotic-assisted operations in urgent surgery. The aim of this study was to collect and classify the existing studies. A two-stage, PRISMA-compliant literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted. We analyzed all articles on robotic surgery associated with urgent general surgery resp. acute surgical diseases of the abdomen. Gynecological and urological diseases so as vascular surgery, except mesenterial ischemia, were excluded. Studies and case reports/series published between 1980 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. In addition to a descriptive synopsis, various outcome parameters were systematically recorded. Fifty-two studies of operations for acute appendicitis and cholecystitis, hernias and acute conditions of the gastrointestinal tract were included. The level of evidence is low. Surgical robots in the narrow sense and robotic camera mounts were used. All narrow-sense robots are nonautonomous systems; in 82%, the Da Vinci(®) system was used. The most frequently published emergency operations were urgent cholecystectomies (30 studies, 703 patients) followed by incarcerated hernias (9 studies, 199 patients). Feasibility of robotic operations was demonstrated for all indications. Neither robotic-specific problems nor extensive complication rates were reported. Various urgent operations in general surgery can be performed robotically without increased risk. The available data do not allow a final evidence-based assessment. Springer London 2022-06-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10076409/ /pubmed/35727485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Reinisch, Alexander
Liese, Juliane
Padberg, Winfried
Ulrich, Frank
Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
title Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
title_full Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
title_fullStr Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
title_short Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
title_sort robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6
work_keys_str_mv AT reinischalexander roboticoperationsinurgentgeneralsurgeryasystematicreview
AT liesejuliane roboticoperationsinurgentgeneralsurgeryasystematicreview
AT padbergwinfried roboticoperationsinurgentgeneralsurgeryasystematicreview
AT ulrichfrank roboticoperationsinurgentgeneralsurgeryasystematicreview