Cargando…

Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study

Pilot balloon palpation is still a commonly used method to evaluate cuff pressure of the endotracheal tube after intubation. This study determined whether the size of the tracheal tube influenced the accuracy of pilot balloon palpation. A prospective observational analysis of 208 patients intubated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ban, Min Gi, Kim, So Yeon, Kim, Min Soo, Park, Wyun Kon, Kwon, Young In, Kim, Hyun Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32704-3
_version_ 1785020136463269888
author Ban, Min Gi
Kim, So Yeon
Kim, Min Soo
Park, Wyun Kon
Kwon, Young In
Kim, Hyun Joo
author_facet Ban, Min Gi
Kim, So Yeon
Kim, Min Soo
Park, Wyun Kon
Kwon, Young In
Kim, Hyun Joo
author_sort Ban, Min Gi
collection PubMed
description Pilot balloon palpation is still a commonly used method to evaluate cuff pressure of the endotracheal tube after intubation. This study determined whether the size of the tracheal tube influenced the accuracy of pilot balloon palpation. A prospective observational analysis of 208 patients intubated with an endotracheal tube of internal diameter (ID) 6.0 or 8.0 was conducted. An anesthesiologist judged the cuff pressure by manual pilot balloon palpation, and then measured the cuff pressure with a pressure gauge. Cuff pressure exceeding 20–30 cmH(2)O was defined as false recognition. The intracuff pressure was significantly higher in ID 6.0 tube than in the ID 8.0 tube (41.9 ± 18.8 cmH(2)O vs. 30.3 ± 11.9 cmH(2)O, p < 0.001). The number of patients that were mistakenly perceived to have appropriate cuff pressure by pilot balloon palpation was significantly higher in the ID 6.0 group compared to the ID 8.0 group (85 (81.7%) vs. 64 (61.5%), p = 0.001). Therefore, a smaller tube size may further increase risk of inaccurate measurement by pilot balloon palpation and although pressure gauge is recommended for all sizes to maximize accuracy, groups with increased risk factors should be targeted for standardized use of the pressure gauge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10076498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100764982023-04-07 Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study Ban, Min Gi Kim, So Yeon Kim, Min Soo Park, Wyun Kon Kwon, Young In Kim, Hyun Joo Sci Rep Article Pilot balloon palpation is still a commonly used method to evaluate cuff pressure of the endotracheal tube after intubation. This study determined whether the size of the tracheal tube influenced the accuracy of pilot balloon palpation. A prospective observational analysis of 208 patients intubated with an endotracheal tube of internal diameter (ID) 6.0 or 8.0 was conducted. An anesthesiologist judged the cuff pressure by manual pilot balloon palpation, and then measured the cuff pressure with a pressure gauge. Cuff pressure exceeding 20–30 cmH(2)O was defined as false recognition. The intracuff pressure was significantly higher in ID 6.0 tube than in the ID 8.0 tube (41.9 ± 18.8 cmH(2)O vs. 30.3 ± 11.9 cmH(2)O, p < 0.001). The number of patients that were mistakenly perceived to have appropriate cuff pressure by pilot balloon palpation was significantly higher in the ID 6.0 group compared to the ID 8.0 group (85 (81.7%) vs. 64 (61.5%), p = 0.001). Therefore, a smaller tube size may further increase risk of inaccurate measurement by pilot balloon palpation and although pressure gauge is recommended for all sizes to maximize accuracy, groups with increased risk factors should be targeted for standardized use of the pressure gauge. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10076498/ /pubmed/37020098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32704-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ban, Min Gi
Kim, So Yeon
Kim, Min Soo
Park, Wyun Kon
Kwon, Young In
Kim, Hyun Joo
Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
title Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
title_full Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
title_fullStr Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
title_short Accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
title_sort accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for cuff pressure assessment in small versus large sized tubes: a prospective non-randomized observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32704-3
work_keys_str_mv AT banmingi accuracyofpilotballoonpalpationforcuffpressureassessmentinsmallversuslargesizedtubesaprospectivenonrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT kimsoyeon accuracyofpilotballoonpalpationforcuffpressureassessmentinsmallversuslargesizedtubesaprospectivenonrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT kimminsoo accuracyofpilotballoonpalpationforcuffpressureassessmentinsmallversuslargesizedtubesaprospectivenonrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT parkwyunkon accuracyofpilotballoonpalpationforcuffpressureassessmentinsmallversuslargesizedtubesaprospectivenonrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT kwonyoungin accuracyofpilotballoonpalpationforcuffpressureassessmentinsmallversuslargesizedtubesaprospectivenonrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT kimhyunjoo accuracyofpilotballoonpalpationforcuffpressureassessmentinsmallversuslargesizedtubesaprospectivenonrandomizedobservationalstudy