Cargando…

Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management

BACKGROUND: Migraine follow-up is difficult for outpatients, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, we tried to identify the most appropriate telemedicine methods for migraine in terms of efficacy, safety, patient compliance, and patient and physician satisfaction. METHODS: Migraine patients were s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Qinlin, Liu, Fang, Yu, Xiran, Zang, Jiali, Tan, Ge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1093287
_version_ 1785020142610022400
author Liu, Qinlin
Liu, Fang
Yu, Xiran
Zang, Jiali
Tan, Ge
author_facet Liu, Qinlin
Liu, Fang
Yu, Xiran
Zang, Jiali
Tan, Ge
author_sort Liu, Qinlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Migraine follow-up is difficult for outpatients, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, we tried to identify the most appropriate telemedicine methods for migraine in terms of efficacy, safety, patient compliance, and patient and physician satisfaction. METHODS: Migraine patients were screened from the Headache Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 2019 to December 2021 and randomly classified into an outpatient group and four telemedicine groups: social software, telephone, E-mail, and short message. Headache specialists followed up with the patients 3 and 6 months after their visit and asked about their satisfaction with the follow-up in each instance, as were the headache specialists. RESULTS: A total of 147 migraine patients were included, of whom 65 completed the follow-up. After 3 and 6 months of follow-up, the proportion of patients whose monthly headache frequency decreased by over 50% in the social-software, telephone, and E-mail groups was no different from that in the outpatient group. A similar result was obtained from evaluations with the Visual Analog Scale, the Headache Impact Test and the Migraine Disability Assessment compared with baseline in social software and telephone groups. The compliance in social-software group was not worse than that in the outpatient group. The proportion of patients in the E-mail group who completed the follow-up and the proportion of patients in the telephone group who consistently took preventive medication were significantly lower than those in the outpatient group. After 6 months, the majority of patients in the outpatient, social-software, and telephone groups and headache specialists in the outpatient, social-software groups were satisfied with the follow-up, while fewer patients in the E-mail group and fewer specialists in the telephone and E-mail group showed their satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Compared with outpatient visits, it is safe and effective to use social software and telephone to follow up on migraine patients, and E-mail and short-message follow-up have lower feasibility. Migraine patients prefer social-software and telephone follow-up, while specialists prefer social-software follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10076524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100765242023-04-07 Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management Liu, Qinlin Liu, Fang Yu, Xiran Zang, Jiali Tan, Ge Front Mol Neurosci Molecular Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Migraine follow-up is difficult for outpatients, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, we tried to identify the most appropriate telemedicine methods for migraine in terms of efficacy, safety, patient compliance, and patient and physician satisfaction. METHODS: Migraine patients were screened from the Headache Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 2019 to December 2021 and randomly classified into an outpatient group and four telemedicine groups: social software, telephone, E-mail, and short message. Headache specialists followed up with the patients 3 and 6 months after their visit and asked about their satisfaction with the follow-up in each instance, as were the headache specialists. RESULTS: A total of 147 migraine patients were included, of whom 65 completed the follow-up. After 3 and 6 months of follow-up, the proportion of patients whose monthly headache frequency decreased by over 50% in the social-software, telephone, and E-mail groups was no different from that in the outpatient group. A similar result was obtained from evaluations with the Visual Analog Scale, the Headache Impact Test and the Migraine Disability Assessment compared with baseline in social software and telephone groups. The compliance in social-software group was not worse than that in the outpatient group. The proportion of patients in the E-mail group who completed the follow-up and the proportion of patients in the telephone group who consistently took preventive medication were significantly lower than those in the outpatient group. After 6 months, the majority of patients in the outpatient, social-software, and telephone groups and headache specialists in the outpatient, social-software groups were satisfied with the follow-up, while fewer patients in the E-mail group and fewer specialists in the telephone and E-mail group showed their satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Compared with outpatient visits, it is safe and effective to use social software and telephone to follow up on migraine patients, and E-mail and short-message follow-up have lower feasibility. Migraine patients prefer social-software and telephone follow-up, while specialists prefer social-software follow-up. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10076524/ /pubmed/37033375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1093287 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liu, Liu, Yu, Zang and Tan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Molecular Neuroscience
Liu, Qinlin
Liu, Fang
Yu, Xiran
Zang, Jiali
Tan, Ge
Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
title Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
title_full Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
title_fullStr Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
title_short Telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
title_sort telemedicine efficacy and satisfaction of patients and headache specialists in migraine management
topic Molecular Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1093287
work_keys_str_mv AT liuqinlin telemedicineefficacyandsatisfactionofpatientsandheadachespecialistsinmigrainemanagement
AT liufang telemedicineefficacyandsatisfactionofpatientsandheadachespecialistsinmigrainemanagement
AT yuxiran telemedicineefficacyandsatisfactionofpatientsandheadachespecialistsinmigrainemanagement
AT zangjiali telemedicineefficacyandsatisfactionofpatientsandheadachespecialistsinmigrainemanagement
AT tange telemedicineefficacyandsatisfactionofpatientsandheadachespecialistsinmigrainemanagement