Cargando…

Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is the main method for urinary calculi. An anesthesia method with little effect on the blood circulation and which does not affect the postoperative activity of a patient is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of paravertebral nerve block (PNB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Pengcheng, Meng, Qianqian, Miao, YuanYuan, Zhou, Le, Wang, Chun, Yang, Haitao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112642
_version_ 1785020170839785472
author Zhu, Pengcheng
Meng, Qianqian
Miao, YuanYuan
Zhou, Le
Wang, Chun
Yang, Haitao
author_facet Zhu, Pengcheng
Meng, Qianqian
Miao, YuanYuan
Zhou, Le
Wang, Chun
Yang, Haitao
author_sort Zhu, Pengcheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is the main method for urinary calculi. An anesthesia method with little effect on the blood circulation and which does not affect the postoperative activity of a patient is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of paravertebral nerve block (PNB) and epidural block (EPB) on quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM) strength in patients after PCNL. METHODS: 163 patients were separated into two groups: EPB (81) and PNB (82). Primary outcome parameters were QFM strength and range of motion (RoM) of the knee 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 24 h after anesthesia induction (AI). Secondary outcome parameters were: time from AI beginning to first ambulation; time of sensory-plane recovery; amount of additional analgesics given during and after surgery; prevalence of nausea and vomiting; duration of hospital stay (DoHS); mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) before, 0.5 h, and 1 h after AI; visual analog scale (VAS) score 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 24 h after AI. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in QFM strength or knee RoM before or 24 h after AI between the two groups (P > 0.05). The time from AI to first ambulation was shorter (P < 0.05) and the sensory plane took longer to recover (P < 0.05) in the PNB group than in the EPB group. The amount of additional analgesics during surgery was more in the PNB group than in the EPB group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference after surgery (P > 0.05). VAS scores were higher in the PNB group than in the EPB group 0.5 after AI (P < 0.05). MAP 1 h after AI was higher in the PNB group than in the EPB group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, DoHS, HR, or SpO(2) at 0.5 h and 1 h after AI between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing PCNL, PNB can meet the need for surgical analgesia while having little effect on QFM strength. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200060606.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10076621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100766212023-04-07 Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study Zhu, Pengcheng Meng, Qianqian Miao, YuanYuan Zhou, Le Wang, Chun Yang, Haitao Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is the main method for urinary calculi. An anesthesia method with little effect on the blood circulation and which does not affect the postoperative activity of a patient is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of paravertebral nerve block (PNB) and epidural block (EPB) on quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM) strength in patients after PCNL. METHODS: 163 patients were separated into two groups: EPB (81) and PNB (82). Primary outcome parameters were QFM strength and range of motion (RoM) of the knee 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 24 h after anesthesia induction (AI). Secondary outcome parameters were: time from AI beginning to first ambulation; time of sensory-plane recovery; amount of additional analgesics given during and after surgery; prevalence of nausea and vomiting; duration of hospital stay (DoHS); mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) before, 0.5 h, and 1 h after AI; visual analog scale (VAS) score 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 24 h after AI. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in QFM strength or knee RoM before or 24 h after AI between the two groups (P > 0.05). The time from AI to first ambulation was shorter (P < 0.05) and the sensory plane took longer to recover (P < 0.05) in the PNB group than in the EPB group. The amount of additional analgesics during surgery was more in the PNB group than in the EPB group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference after surgery (P > 0.05). VAS scores were higher in the PNB group than in the EPB group 0.5 after AI (P < 0.05). MAP 1 h after AI was higher in the PNB group than in the EPB group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, DoHS, HR, or SpO(2) at 0.5 h and 1 h after AI between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing PCNL, PNB can meet the need for surgical analgesia while having little effect on QFM strength. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200060606. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10076621/ /pubmed/37035555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112642 Text en © 2023 Zhu, Meng, Miao, Zhou, Wang and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zhu, Pengcheng
Meng, Qianqian
Miao, YuanYuan
Zhou, Le
Wang, Chun
Yang, Haitao
Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study
title Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study
title_full Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study
title_fullStr Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study
title_short Paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized study
title_sort paravertebral block vs. epidural block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112642
work_keys_str_mv AT zhupengcheng paravertebralblockvsepiduralblockforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mengqianqian paravertebralblockvsepiduralblockforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT miaoyuanyuan paravertebralblockvsepiduralblockforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT zhoule paravertebralblockvsepiduralblockforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT wangchun paravertebralblockvsepiduralblockforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT yanghaitao paravertebralblockvsepiduralblockforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedstudy