Cargando…
An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
In abstract argumentation theory, many argumentation semantics have been proposed for evaluating argumentation frameworks. This article is based on the following research question: Which semantics corresponds well to what humans consider a rational judgment on the acceptability of arguments? There a...
Autores principales: | Cramer, Marcos, van der Torre, Leendert |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1045663 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Argumentation and explanation in the law
por: Rotolo, Antonino, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Argumentation: A calculus for Human-Centric AI
por: Dietz, Emmanuelle, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Developing a Conversational Agent’s Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Model of Arguments
por: Mirzababaei, Behzad, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty
por: Straßer, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Argument-based human–AI collaboration for supporting behavior change to improve health
por: Kilic, Kaan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)