Cargando…

Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators

BACKGROUND: Both electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and low-frequency noise (LFN) are widespread and influential environmental factors, and operators are inevitably exposed to both EMR and LFN within a complex exposure environment. The potential adverse effects of such exposure on human health must be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Peng, Li, Zenglei, Li, Jiangjing, Wei, Jing, Li, Jing, Zhang, Shenghao, Xu, Shenglong, Liu, Zhaohui, Wang, Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138118
_version_ 1785020233975595008
author Liang, Peng
Li, Zenglei
Li, Jiangjing
Wei, Jing
Li, Jing
Zhang, Shenghao
Xu, Shenglong
Liu, Zhaohui
Wang, Jin
author_facet Liang, Peng
Li, Zenglei
Li, Jiangjing
Wei, Jing
Li, Jing
Zhang, Shenghao
Xu, Shenglong
Liu, Zhaohui
Wang, Jin
author_sort Liang, Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and low-frequency noise (LFN) are widespread and influential environmental factors, and operators are inevitably exposed to both EMR and LFN within a complex exposure environment. The potential adverse effects of such exposure on human health must be considered seriously. This study aimed to investigate the effects of EMR and LFN on cognitive function as well as their interaction effect, which remain unclear. METHODS: Sixty young male college students were randomly grouped and experiments were conducted with a 2 × 2 factorial design in a shielded chamber. Mental workload (MWL) levels of the study subjects were measured and assessed using the NASA-task load index (TLX) subjective scale, an n-back task paradigm, and the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) imaging technique. RESULTS: For the 3-back task, the NASA-TLX subjective scale revealed a statistically significant main effect of LFN intensity, which enhanced the subjects’ MWL level (F = 8.716, p < 0.01). Behavioral performance revealed that EMR intensity (430.1357 MHz, 10.75 W/m(2)) and LFN intensity (0–200 Hz, 72.9 dB) had a synergistic interaction effect, and the correct response time was statistically significantly prolonged by the combined exposure (F = 4.343, p < 0.05). The fNIRS imaging technique revealed a synergistic interaction effect between operational EMR intensity and operational LFN intensity, with statistically significant effects on the activation levels in the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The mean β values of DLPFC were significantly increased (L-DLPFC F = 5.391, p < 0.05, R-DLPFC F = 4.222, p < 0.05), and the relative concentrations of oxyhemoglobin in the DLPFC were also significantly increased (L-DLPFC F = 4.925, p < 0.05, R-DLPFC F = 9.715, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We found a statistically significant interaction effect between EMR (430.1357 MHz, 10.75 W/m(2)) and LFN (0–200 Hz, 72.9 dB) when simultaneously exposing subjects to both for 30 min. We conclude that exposure to this complex environment can cause a statistically significant increase in the MWL level of operators, and even alterations in their cognitive function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10076881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100768812023-04-07 Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators Liang, Peng Li, Zenglei Li, Jiangjing Wei, Jing Li, Jing Zhang, Shenghao Xu, Shenglong Liu, Zhaohui Wang, Jin Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Both electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and low-frequency noise (LFN) are widespread and influential environmental factors, and operators are inevitably exposed to both EMR and LFN within a complex exposure environment. The potential adverse effects of such exposure on human health must be considered seriously. This study aimed to investigate the effects of EMR and LFN on cognitive function as well as their interaction effect, which remain unclear. METHODS: Sixty young male college students were randomly grouped and experiments were conducted with a 2 × 2 factorial design in a shielded chamber. Mental workload (MWL) levels of the study subjects were measured and assessed using the NASA-task load index (TLX) subjective scale, an n-back task paradigm, and the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) imaging technique. RESULTS: For the 3-back task, the NASA-TLX subjective scale revealed a statistically significant main effect of LFN intensity, which enhanced the subjects’ MWL level (F = 8.716, p < 0.01). Behavioral performance revealed that EMR intensity (430.1357 MHz, 10.75 W/m(2)) and LFN intensity (0–200 Hz, 72.9 dB) had a synergistic interaction effect, and the correct response time was statistically significantly prolonged by the combined exposure (F = 4.343, p < 0.05). The fNIRS imaging technique revealed a synergistic interaction effect between operational EMR intensity and operational LFN intensity, with statistically significant effects on the activation levels in the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The mean β values of DLPFC were significantly increased (L-DLPFC F = 5.391, p < 0.05, R-DLPFC F = 4.222, p < 0.05), and the relative concentrations of oxyhemoglobin in the DLPFC were also significantly increased (L-DLPFC F = 4.925, p < 0.05, R-DLPFC F = 9.715, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We found a statistically significant interaction effect between EMR (430.1357 MHz, 10.75 W/m(2)) and LFN (0–200 Hz, 72.9 dB) when simultaneously exposing subjects to both for 30 min. We conclude that exposure to this complex environment can cause a statistically significant increase in the MWL level of operators, and even alterations in their cognitive function. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10076881/ /pubmed/37033075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138118 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liang, Li, Li, Wei, Li, Zhang, Xu, Liu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Liang, Peng
Li, Zenglei
Li, Jiangjing
Wei, Jing
Li, Jing
Zhang, Shenghao
Xu, Shenglong
Liu, Zhaohui
Wang, Jin
Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
title Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
title_full Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
title_fullStr Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
title_short Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
title_sort impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138118
work_keys_str_mv AT liangpeng impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT lizenglei impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT lijiangjing impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT weijing impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT lijing impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT zhangshenghao impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT xushenglong impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT liuzhaohui impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators
AT wangjin impactsofcomplexelectromagneticradiationandlowfrequencynoiseexposureconditionsonthecognitivefunctionofoperators