Cargando…

An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning model for detection of nasogastric tube (NGT) malposition on chest radiographs and assess model impact as a clinical decision support tool for junior physicians to help determine whether feeding can be safely performed in patients (feed/do not feed)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drozdov, Ignat, Dixon, Rachael, Szubert, Benjamin, Dunn, Jessica, Green, Darren, Hall, Nicola, Shirandami, Arman, Rosas, Sofia, Grech, Ryan, Puttagunta, Srikanth, Hall, Mark, Lowe, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radiological Society of North America 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220165
_version_ 1785020255671681024
author Drozdov, Ignat
Dixon, Rachael
Szubert, Benjamin
Dunn, Jessica
Green, Darren
Hall, Nicola
Shirandami, Arman
Rosas, Sofia
Grech, Ryan
Puttagunta, Srikanth
Hall, Mark
Lowe, David J.
author_facet Drozdov, Ignat
Dixon, Rachael
Szubert, Benjamin
Dunn, Jessica
Green, Darren
Hall, Nicola
Shirandami, Arman
Rosas, Sofia
Grech, Ryan
Puttagunta, Srikanth
Hall, Mark
Lowe, David J.
author_sort Drozdov, Ignat
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning model for detection of nasogastric tube (NGT) malposition on chest radiographs and assess model impact as a clinical decision support tool for junior physicians to help determine whether feeding can be safely performed in patients (feed/do not feed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A neural network ensemble was pretrained on 1 132 142 retrospectively collected (June 2007–August 2019) frontal chest radiographs and further fine-tuned on 7081 chest radiographs labeled by three radiologists. Clinical relevance was assessed on an independent set of 335 images. Five junior emergency medicine physicians assessed chest radiographs and made feed/do not feed decisions without and with artificial intelligence (AI)-generated NGT malposition probabilities placed above chest radiographs. Decisions from the radiologists served as ground truths. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Agreement between junior physician and radiologist decision was determined using the Cohen κ coefficient. RESULTS: In the testing set, the ensemble achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.86), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.83), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00) for satisfactory, malpositioned, and bronchial positions, respectively. In the clinical evaluation set, mean interreader agreement for feed/do not feed decisions among junior physicians was 0.65 ± 0.03 (SD) and 0.77 ± 0.13 without and with AI support, respectively. Mean agreement between junior physicians and radiologists was 0.53 ± 0.05 (unaided) and 0.65 ± 0.09 (AI-aided). CONCLUSION: A simple classifier for NGT malposition may help junior physicians determine the safety of feeding in patients with NGTs. Keywords: Neural Networks, Feature Detection, Supervised Learning, Machine Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10077078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Radiological Society of North America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100770782023-04-07 An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support Drozdov, Ignat Dixon, Rachael Szubert, Benjamin Dunn, Jessica Green, Darren Hall, Nicola Shirandami, Arman Rosas, Sofia Grech, Ryan Puttagunta, Srikanth Hall, Mark Lowe, David J. Radiol Artif Intell Original Research PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning model for detection of nasogastric tube (NGT) malposition on chest radiographs and assess model impact as a clinical decision support tool for junior physicians to help determine whether feeding can be safely performed in patients (feed/do not feed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A neural network ensemble was pretrained on 1 132 142 retrospectively collected (June 2007–August 2019) frontal chest radiographs and further fine-tuned on 7081 chest radiographs labeled by three radiologists. Clinical relevance was assessed on an independent set of 335 images. Five junior emergency medicine physicians assessed chest radiographs and made feed/do not feed decisions without and with artificial intelligence (AI)-generated NGT malposition probabilities placed above chest radiographs. Decisions from the radiologists served as ground truths. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Agreement between junior physician and radiologist decision was determined using the Cohen κ coefficient. RESULTS: In the testing set, the ensemble achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.86), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.83), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00) for satisfactory, malpositioned, and bronchial positions, respectively. In the clinical evaluation set, mean interreader agreement for feed/do not feed decisions among junior physicians was 0.65 ± 0.03 (SD) and 0.77 ± 0.13 without and with AI support, respectively. Mean agreement between junior physicians and radiologists was 0.53 ± 0.05 (unaided) and 0.65 ± 0.09 (AI-aided). CONCLUSION: A simple classifier for NGT malposition may help junior physicians determine the safety of feeding in patients with NGTs. Keywords: Neural Networks, Feature Detection, Supervised Learning, Machine Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Radiological Society of North America 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10077078/ /pubmed/37035435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220165 Text en © 2023 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published under a (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) CC BY 4.0 license.
spellingShingle Original Research
Drozdov, Ignat
Dixon, Rachael
Szubert, Benjamin
Dunn, Jessica
Green, Darren
Hall, Nicola
Shirandami, Arman
Rosas, Sofia
Grech, Ryan
Puttagunta, Srikanth
Hall, Mark
Lowe, David J.
An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support
title An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support
title_full An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support
title_fullStr An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support
title_full_unstemmed An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support
title_short An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support
title_sort artificial neural network for nasogastric tube position decision support
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220165
work_keys_str_mv AT drozdovignat anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT dixonrachael anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT szubertbenjamin anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT dunnjessica anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT greendarren anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT hallnicola anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT shirandamiarman anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT rosassofia anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT grechryan anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT puttaguntasrikanth anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT hallmark anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT lowedavidj anartificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT drozdovignat artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT dixonrachael artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT szubertbenjamin artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT dunnjessica artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT greendarren artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT hallnicola artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT shirandamiarman artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT rosassofia artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT grechryan artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT puttaguntasrikanth artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT hallmark artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport
AT lowedavidj artificialneuralnetworkfornasogastrictubepositiondecisionsupport