Cargando…
Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients
AIMS: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K‐TUT) among patients in China. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. METHODS: A convenience sample of 171 kidney transplant (KT) candidates and 272 KT recipients was recruited from two tertia...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1544 |
_version_ | 1785020284234891264 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Hangxia Hu, Maosen Wan, Jingjing |
author_facet | Ma, Hangxia Hu, Maosen Wan, Jingjing |
author_sort | Ma, Hangxia |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K‐TUT) among patients in China. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. METHODS: A convenience sample of 171 kidney transplant (KT) candidates and 272 KT recipients was recruited from two tertiary and Grade A hospitals in Hunan Province, China. The reliability was calculated by half‐fold reliability, test–retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha. The validity was analysed by the content validity index. RESULTS: For KT candidates, the Chinese version of K‐TUT deleted items 4, 6, 7 and 8, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.778, half‐fold reliability values were 0.792, and test–retest reliability values were 0.902. For KT recipients, the tool deleted items 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.769, half‐fold coefficient values were 0.701, and retest coefficient values were 0.888. The content validity index was 0.967. CONCLUSIONS: The K‐TUT is an acceptable and reliable measurement for evaluating the relevant knowledge of KT recipients and candidates. IMPACT: It is anticipated that this new tool will help the nursing staff to identify specific areas of deficiency that could be targeted in health education to improve the KT knowledge of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10077359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100773592023-04-07 Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients Ma, Hangxia Hu, Maosen Wan, Jingjing Nurs Open Empirical Research Quantitative AIMS: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K‐TUT) among patients in China. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. METHODS: A convenience sample of 171 kidney transplant (KT) candidates and 272 KT recipients was recruited from two tertiary and Grade A hospitals in Hunan Province, China. The reliability was calculated by half‐fold reliability, test–retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha. The validity was analysed by the content validity index. RESULTS: For KT candidates, the Chinese version of K‐TUT deleted items 4, 6, 7 and 8, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.778, half‐fold reliability values were 0.792, and test–retest reliability values were 0.902. For KT recipients, the tool deleted items 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.769, half‐fold coefficient values were 0.701, and retest coefficient values were 0.888. The content validity index was 0.967. CONCLUSIONS: The K‐TUT is an acceptable and reliable measurement for evaluating the relevant knowledge of KT recipients and candidates. IMPACT: It is anticipated that this new tool will help the nursing staff to identify specific areas of deficiency that could be targeted in health education to improve the KT knowledge of patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10077359/ /pubmed/36598883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1544 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Empirical Research Quantitative Ma, Hangxia Hu, Maosen Wan, Jingjing Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients |
title | Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients |
title_full | Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients |
title_short | Validation of the Chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in Chinese patients |
title_sort | validation of the chinese version of the kidney transplant understanding tool in chinese patients |
topic | Empirical Research Quantitative |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahangxia validationofthechineseversionofthekidneytransplantunderstandingtoolinchinesepatients AT humaosen validationofthechineseversionofthekidneytransplantunderstandingtoolinchinesepatients AT wanjingjing validationofthechineseversionofthekidneytransplantunderstandingtoolinchinesepatients |