Cargando…
The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia
BACKGROUND: Encouraging the early development of healthy eating habits prevents diet-related chronic disease. It is well understood that highly processed foods with high amounts of sugars, salt and fats are a risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Commercial baby foods in ready-to-use squeeze po...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15492-3 |
_version_ | 1785020361893478400 |
---|---|
author | Brunacci, Kaitlyn A Salmon, Libby McCann, Jennifer Gribble, Karleen Fleming, Catharine A.K. |
author_facet | Brunacci, Kaitlyn A Salmon, Libby McCann, Jennifer Gribble, Karleen Fleming, Catharine A.K. |
author_sort | Brunacci, Kaitlyn A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Encouraging the early development of healthy eating habits prevents diet-related chronic disease. It is well understood that highly processed foods with high amounts of sugars, salt and fats are a risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Commercial baby foods in ready-to-use squeeze pouches emerged in the global food market around 2012. The long-term effects of this now ubiquitous packaging on the quality of infant diets, baby food consumption and marketing are unknown. This study aimed to conduct a rigorous mixed-methods audit of squeeze pouches in Australia to inform product regulation and policy. METHODS: Nutritional and marketing data were sourced from products available in Australian retailers. Analysis of nutritional content, texture and packaging labelling and serving size was conducted. Pouches were given a Nutrition Profile Index (NPI) score and compared with the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines. Marketing text was thematically analysed and compared to existing infant nutrition policy around regulation of marketing claims. RESULTS: 276 products from 15 manufacturers were analysed, targeting infants from 4 + to 12 + months. Total sugar content ranged 0.8-17.5 g/100 g, 20% (n = 56) of products had added sugars, 17% (n = 46) had added fruit juice, 71% (n = 196) had added fruit puree. Saturated fat content ranged from 0.0 to 5.0 g/100 g, sodium 0.0-69 mg/100 g and dietary fibre 0.0-4.3 g/100 g. Only two products were nutritionally adequate according to a nutrient profiling tool. Marketing messages included ingredient premiumisation, nutrient absence claims, claims about infant development and health, good parenting, and convenience. Claims of ‘no added sugar’ were made for 59% of pouches, despite the addition of free sugars. CONCLUSIONS: Squeeze pouch products available in Australia are nutritionally poor, high in sugars, not fortified with iron, and there is a clear risk of harm tothe health of infant and young children if these products are fed regularly. The marketing messages and labelling on squeeze pouches are misleading and do not support WHO or Australian NHMRC recommendations for breastfeeding or appropriate introduction of complementary foods and labelling of products. There is an urgent need for improved regulation of product composition, serving sizes and labelling to protect infants and young children aged 0–36 months and better inform parents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10077707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100777072023-04-07 The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia Brunacci, Kaitlyn A Salmon, Libby McCann, Jennifer Gribble, Karleen Fleming, Catharine A.K. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Encouraging the early development of healthy eating habits prevents diet-related chronic disease. It is well understood that highly processed foods with high amounts of sugars, salt and fats are a risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Commercial baby foods in ready-to-use squeeze pouches emerged in the global food market around 2012. The long-term effects of this now ubiquitous packaging on the quality of infant diets, baby food consumption and marketing are unknown. This study aimed to conduct a rigorous mixed-methods audit of squeeze pouches in Australia to inform product regulation and policy. METHODS: Nutritional and marketing data were sourced from products available in Australian retailers. Analysis of nutritional content, texture and packaging labelling and serving size was conducted. Pouches were given a Nutrition Profile Index (NPI) score and compared with the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines. Marketing text was thematically analysed and compared to existing infant nutrition policy around regulation of marketing claims. RESULTS: 276 products from 15 manufacturers were analysed, targeting infants from 4 + to 12 + months. Total sugar content ranged 0.8-17.5 g/100 g, 20% (n = 56) of products had added sugars, 17% (n = 46) had added fruit juice, 71% (n = 196) had added fruit puree. Saturated fat content ranged from 0.0 to 5.0 g/100 g, sodium 0.0-69 mg/100 g and dietary fibre 0.0-4.3 g/100 g. Only two products were nutritionally adequate according to a nutrient profiling tool. Marketing messages included ingredient premiumisation, nutrient absence claims, claims about infant development and health, good parenting, and convenience. Claims of ‘no added sugar’ were made for 59% of pouches, despite the addition of free sugars. CONCLUSIONS: Squeeze pouch products available in Australia are nutritionally poor, high in sugars, not fortified with iron, and there is a clear risk of harm tothe health of infant and young children if these products are fed regularly. The marketing messages and labelling on squeeze pouches are misleading and do not support WHO or Australian NHMRC recommendations for breastfeeding or appropriate introduction of complementary foods and labelling of products. There is an urgent need for improved regulation of product composition, serving sizes and labelling to protect infants and young children aged 0–36 months and better inform parents. BioMed Central 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10077707/ /pubmed/37024884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15492-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Brunacci, Kaitlyn A Salmon, Libby McCann, Jennifer Gribble, Karleen Fleming, Catharine A.K. The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia |
title | The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia |
title_full | The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia |
title_fullStr | The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia |
title_short | The big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in Australia |
title_sort | big squeeze: a product content and labelling analysis of ready-to-use complementary infant food pouches in australia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15492-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunaccikaitlyna thebigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT salmonlibby thebigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT mccannjennifer thebigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT gribblekarleen thebigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT flemingcatharineak thebigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT brunaccikaitlyna bigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT salmonlibby bigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT mccannjennifer bigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT gribblekarleen bigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia AT flemingcatharineak bigsqueezeaproductcontentandlabellinganalysisofreadytousecomplementaryinfantfoodpouchesinaustralia |