Cargando…
Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives
The impact of premature elevation of progesterone (PPE) on the day of the trigger on pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles has been a matter of contention and debate for decades. Research over the last 30 years has indicated that PPE >1.5 ng/ml is associated with declining live...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033132 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_162_22 |
_version_ | 1785020368559276032 |
---|---|
author | Gurunath, Sumana |
author_facet | Gurunath, Sumana |
author_sort | Gurunath, Sumana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact of premature elevation of progesterone (PPE) on the day of the trigger on pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles has been a matter of contention and debate for decades. Research over the last 30 years has indicated that PPE >1.5 ng/ml is associated with declining live birth rates following fresh embryo transfer. Freeze-only approach has become a universal solution to overcome the issue of PPE. However, the topic is still mired with controversy. Few studies have not shown a negative impact on pregnancy rates. The impact of PPE on embryological parameters such as oocyte and embryo quality and ploidy is still very controversial. An important contentious issue is the choice of the threshold P value above which it is considered abnormal and a freeze-all strategy would be cost-effective. Currently, though a cutoff of >1.5 ng/ml is widely used, practices are not uniform and varying thresholds from 0.4 to 3 ng/ml are utilised. This review addresses the current understanding of PPE in IVF and the above controversies. The incidence, aetiology and source of progesterone rise, impact on endometrial receptivity, oocyte and embryo quality, impact on live birth and cumulative live birth and impact on frozen embryo transfer and donor oocyte cycles are discussed. Current controversies regarding the optimal threshold, assay performance and future directions are addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10077738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100777382023-04-07 Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives Gurunath, Sumana J Hum Reprod Sci Narrative Review The impact of premature elevation of progesterone (PPE) on the day of the trigger on pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles has been a matter of contention and debate for decades. Research over the last 30 years has indicated that PPE >1.5 ng/ml is associated with declining live birth rates following fresh embryo transfer. Freeze-only approach has become a universal solution to overcome the issue of PPE. However, the topic is still mired with controversy. Few studies have not shown a negative impact on pregnancy rates. The impact of PPE on embryological parameters such as oocyte and embryo quality and ploidy is still very controversial. An important contentious issue is the choice of the threshold P value above which it is considered abnormal and a freeze-all strategy would be cost-effective. Currently, though a cutoff of >1.5 ng/ml is widely used, practices are not uniform and varying thresholds from 0.4 to 3 ng/ml are utilised. This review addresses the current understanding of PPE in IVF and the above controversies. The incidence, aetiology and source of progesterone rise, impact on endometrial receptivity, oocyte and embryo quality, impact on live birth and cumulative live birth and impact on frozen embryo transfer and donor oocyte cycles are discussed. Current controversies regarding the optimal threshold, assay performance and future directions are addressed. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10077738/ /pubmed/37033132 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_162_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Narrative Review Gurunath, Sumana Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives |
title | Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives |
title_full | Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives |
title_short | Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles – Current Perspectives |
title_sort | premature progesterone elevation in in vitro fertilisation cycles – current perspectives |
topic | Narrative Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033132 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_162_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gurunathsumana prematureprogesteroneelevationininvitrofertilisationcyclescurrentperspectives |