Cargando…

Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials

Several phase‐1 clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of candidate anti‐Zika vaccines. In this systematic review, we systematically evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of candidate vaccines, which would aid researchers in formulating an effective vaccination str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeasmin, Mahmuda, Molla, Md. Maruf Ahmed, Masud, H. M. Abdullah Al, Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, K. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2385
_version_ 1785020419849322496
author Yeasmin, Mahmuda
Molla, Md. Maruf Ahmed
Masud, H. M. Abdullah Al
Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, K. M.
author_facet Yeasmin, Mahmuda
Molla, Md. Maruf Ahmed
Masud, H. M. Abdullah Al
Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, K. M.
author_sort Yeasmin, Mahmuda
collection PubMed
description Several phase‐1 clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of candidate anti‐Zika vaccines. In this systematic review, we systematically evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of candidate vaccines, which would aid researchers in formulating an effective vaccination strategy for phase‐2 trials based on current evidence. A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE through Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database for relevant studies on candidate anti‐zika vaccines. Studies on animal models were excluded from our study. Healthy individuals who were administered candidate Zika vaccines to evaluate the immune response and adverse events (AEs) compared to placebo were considered. Data were extracted, tabulated, and analysed using Microsoft Excel, while the risk of bias plots were generated using tidyverse and Robvis packages in R‐studio. A total of five phase‐1 clinical trials were included in our analysis comprising of studies on inactivated, viral vector, and DNA vaccines. Immunogenicity ranged from 10% to 100% after vaccination with the lowest seroconversion rate (10%) and geometric mean titre (GMT) (6.3; 95% confidence interval (CI):3.7–10.8) observed among recipients of single‐dose inactivated anti‐zika vaccine (ZPIV). For DNA vaccines, the seroconversion rate ranged from 60% to 100% with the highest seroconversion rate (100%) and GMT (2871; 95% CI:705.3–11688) observed among recipients of three shots of high dose GLS‐5700 vaccine. For viral vector vaccine (Ad26.ZIKV.001) seroconversion rate (100%) and GMT peaked after two shots with both low and high‐dose vaccines. In all those studies AEs were mostly local including injection site pain, erythema, and itching. The most common systemic AEs included fever, myalgia, nausea, and fatigue. In phase‐1 clinical trials, all candidate vaccines were found to be highly immunogenic and relatively safe, especially when administered in higher doses and with the help of needle‐free devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10077998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100779982023-04-07 Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials Yeasmin, Mahmuda Molla, Md. Maruf Ahmed Masud, H. M. Abdullah Al Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, K. M. Rev Med Virol Reviews Several phase‐1 clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of candidate anti‐Zika vaccines. In this systematic review, we systematically evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of candidate vaccines, which would aid researchers in formulating an effective vaccination strategy for phase‐2 trials based on current evidence. A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE through Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database for relevant studies on candidate anti‐zika vaccines. Studies on animal models were excluded from our study. Healthy individuals who were administered candidate Zika vaccines to evaluate the immune response and adverse events (AEs) compared to placebo were considered. Data were extracted, tabulated, and analysed using Microsoft Excel, while the risk of bias plots were generated using tidyverse and Robvis packages in R‐studio. A total of five phase‐1 clinical trials were included in our analysis comprising of studies on inactivated, viral vector, and DNA vaccines. Immunogenicity ranged from 10% to 100% after vaccination with the lowest seroconversion rate (10%) and geometric mean titre (GMT) (6.3; 95% confidence interval (CI):3.7–10.8) observed among recipients of single‐dose inactivated anti‐zika vaccine (ZPIV). For DNA vaccines, the seroconversion rate ranged from 60% to 100% with the highest seroconversion rate (100%) and GMT (2871; 95% CI:705.3–11688) observed among recipients of three shots of high dose GLS‐5700 vaccine. For viral vector vaccine (Ad26.ZIKV.001) seroconversion rate (100%) and GMT peaked after two shots with both low and high‐dose vaccines. In all those studies AEs were mostly local including injection site pain, erythema, and itching. The most common systemic AEs included fever, myalgia, nausea, and fatigue. In phase‐1 clinical trials, all candidate vaccines were found to be highly immunogenic and relatively safe, especially when administered in higher doses and with the help of needle‐free devices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-20 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10077998/ /pubmed/35986594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2385 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Reviews in Medical Virology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Yeasmin, Mahmuda
Molla, Md. Maruf Ahmed
Masud, H. M. Abdullah Al
Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, K. M.
Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials
title Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials
title_full Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials
title_fullStr Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials
title_short Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials
title_sort safety and immunogenicity of zika virus vaccine: a systematic review of clinical trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2385
work_keys_str_mv AT yeasminmahmuda safetyandimmunogenicityofzikavirusvaccineasystematicreviewofclinicaltrials
AT mollamdmarufahmed safetyandimmunogenicityofzikavirusvaccineasystematicreviewofclinicaltrials
AT masudhmabdullahal safetyandimmunogenicityofzikavirusvaccineasystematicreviewofclinicaltrials
AT saifurrahmankm safetyandimmunogenicityofzikavirusvaccineasystematicreviewofclinicaltrials