Cargando…
No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy
Traditional teaching suggests that prior pelvic operations, including prostatectomy, are a contraindication to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Despite the growing use of robotic platforms in inguinal hernia repair, there are few studies describing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (RIHR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01586-y |
_version_ | 1785020431437135872 |
---|---|
author | Lade, Caleb Ford, Hunter Venincasa, Kiran Lewis, Samara Lee, Benjamin Harmon, Allison Choi, Preston Raines, Alexander |
author_facet | Lade, Caleb Ford, Hunter Venincasa, Kiran Lewis, Samara Lee, Benjamin Harmon, Allison Choi, Preston Raines, Alexander |
author_sort | Lade, Caleb |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional teaching suggests that prior pelvic operations, including prostatectomy, are a contraindication to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Despite the growing use of robotic platforms in inguinal hernia repair, there are few studies describing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (RIHR) in this patient population. This study aims to demonstrate that RIHR is safe and effective in repairing inguinal hernias in patients who had previously undergone prostatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed RIHR cases performed from March 2017 to October 2021 by a single surgeon at our university-affiliated community hospital. Cases were reviewed for preoperative considerations, operative times and complications, and postoperative outcomes. A total of 30 patients with prior prostatectomy underwent transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) RIHR with mesh. Sixteen of the 30 patients had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), while 14 patients underwent open resection. Seven of the patients had received post-resection radiation and 12 had previous non-urologic abdominal operations. When compared to all RIHRs performed over the same period, duration of surgery was increased. There were no conversions to open surgery. Postoperatively, one patient developed a repair site seroma which resolved after 1 month. Mean follow-up time was 8.0 months. At follow-up, one patient reported experiencing intermittent non-debilitating pain at the repair site and one patient developed an inguinoscrotal abscess of unknown relation to the repair. No patients reported hernia recurrences nor mesh infection. This review suggests that TAPP RIHR can be a safe and effective approach to inguinal hernia repair in patients who have previously undergone prostatectomy, including those who received radiation and those who underwent either open or robotic resections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100780482023-04-07 No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy Lade, Caleb Ford, Hunter Venincasa, Kiran Lewis, Samara Lee, Benjamin Harmon, Allison Choi, Preston Raines, Alexander J Robot Surg Research Traditional teaching suggests that prior pelvic operations, including prostatectomy, are a contraindication to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Despite the growing use of robotic platforms in inguinal hernia repair, there are few studies describing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (RIHR) in this patient population. This study aims to demonstrate that RIHR is safe and effective in repairing inguinal hernias in patients who had previously undergone prostatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed RIHR cases performed from March 2017 to October 2021 by a single surgeon at our university-affiliated community hospital. Cases were reviewed for preoperative considerations, operative times and complications, and postoperative outcomes. A total of 30 patients with prior prostatectomy underwent transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) RIHR with mesh. Sixteen of the 30 patients had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), while 14 patients underwent open resection. Seven of the patients had received post-resection radiation and 12 had previous non-urologic abdominal operations. When compared to all RIHRs performed over the same period, duration of surgery was increased. There were no conversions to open surgery. Postoperatively, one patient developed a repair site seroma which resolved after 1 month. Mean follow-up time was 8.0 months. At follow-up, one patient reported experiencing intermittent non-debilitating pain at the repair site and one patient developed an inguinoscrotal abscess of unknown relation to the repair. No patients reported hernia recurrences nor mesh infection. This review suggests that TAPP RIHR can be a safe and effective approach to inguinal hernia repair in patients who have previously undergone prostatectomy, including those who received radiation and those who underwent either open or robotic resections. Springer London 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10078048/ /pubmed/37022558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01586-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Lade, Caleb Ford, Hunter Venincasa, Kiran Lewis, Samara Lee, Benjamin Harmon, Allison Choi, Preston Raines, Alexander No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
title | No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
title_full | No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
title_short | No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
title_sort | no prostate? no problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01586-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ladecaleb noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT fordhunter noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT venincasakiran noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT lewissamara noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT leebenjamin noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT harmonallison noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT choipreston noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy AT rainesalexander noprostatenoproblemroboticinguinalherniarepairafterprostatectomy |