Cargando…

m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques

Current inference techniques for processing multi‐needle Langmuir probe (m‐NLP) data are often based on adaptations of the Orbital Motion‐Limited (OML) theory which relies on several simplifying assumptions. Some of these assumptions, however, are typically not well satisfied in actual experimental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Guangdong, Marholm, Sigvald, Eklund, Anders J., Clausen, Lasse, Marchand, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030835
_version_ 1785020447449939968
author Liu, Guangdong
Marholm, Sigvald
Eklund, Anders J.
Clausen, Lasse
Marchand, Richard
author_facet Liu, Guangdong
Marholm, Sigvald
Eklund, Anders J.
Clausen, Lasse
Marchand, Richard
author_sort Liu, Guangdong
collection PubMed
description Current inference techniques for processing multi‐needle Langmuir probe (m‐NLP) data are often based on adaptations of the Orbital Motion‐Limited (OML) theory which relies on several simplifying assumptions. Some of these assumptions, however, are typically not well satisfied in actual experimental conditions, thus leading to uncontrolled uncertainties in inferred plasma parameters. In order to remedy this difficulty, three‐dimensional kinetic particle in cell simulations are used to construct a synthetic data set, which is used to compare and assess different m‐NLP inference techniques. Using a synthetic data set, regression‐based models capable of inferring electron density and satellite potentials from 4‐tuples of currents collected with fixed‐bias needle probes similar to those on the NorSat‐1 satellite, are trained and validated. The regression techniques presented show promising results for plasma density inferences with RMS relative errors less than 20%, and satellite potential inferences with RMS errors less than 0.2 V for potentials ranging from −6 to −1 V. The new inference approaches presented are applied to NorSat‐1 data, and compared with existing state‐of‐the‐art inference techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100781202023-04-07 m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques Liu, Guangdong Marholm, Sigvald Eklund, Anders J. Clausen, Lasse Marchand, Richard J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Article Current inference techniques for processing multi‐needle Langmuir probe (m‐NLP) data are often based on adaptations of the Orbital Motion‐Limited (OML) theory which relies on several simplifying assumptions. Some of these assumptions, however, are typically not well satisfied in actual experimental conditions, thus leading to uncontrolled uncertainties in inferred plasma parameters. In order to remedy this difficulty, three‐dimensional kinetic particle in cell simulations are used to construct a synthetic data set, which is used to compare and assess different m‐NLP inference techniques. Using a synthetic data set, regression‐based models capable of inferring electron density and satellite potentials from 4‐tuples of currents collected with fixed‐bias needle probes similar to those on the NorSat‐1 satellite, are trained and validated. The regression techniques presented show promising results for plasma density inferences with RMS relative errors less than 20%, and satellite potential inferences with RMS errors less than 0.2 V for potentials ranging from −6 to −1 V. The new inference approaches presented are applied to NorSat‐1 data, and compared with existing state‐of‐the‐art inference techniques. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-27 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10078120/ /pubmed/37035843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030835 Text en ©2023. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Guangdong
Marholm, Sigvald
Eklund, Anders J.
Clausen, Lasse
Marchand, Richard
m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques
title m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques
title_full m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques
title_fullStr m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques
title_full_unstemmed m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques
title_short m‐NLP Inference Models Using Simulation and Regression Techniques
title_sort m‐nlp inference models using simulation and regression techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030835
work_keys_str_mv AT liuguangdong mnlpinferencemodelsusingsimulationandregressiontechniques
AT marholmsigvald mnlpinferencemodelsusingsimulationandregressiontechniques
AT eklundandersj mnlpinferencemodelsusingsimulationandregressiontechniques
AT clausenlasse mnlpinferencemodelsusingsimulationandregressiontechniques
AT marchandrichard mnlpinferencemodelsusingsimulationandregressiontechniques