Cargando…
From Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0: Diagnostic changes and clinical implications
BACKGROUND: The Chicago Classification (CC) used to define esophageal motility disorders in high‐resolution manometry (HRM) has evolved over time. Our aim was to compare the frequency of motility disorders diagnosed with the last two versions (CCv3.0 and CCv4.0) and to evaluate symptoms severity acc...
Autores principales: | Sallette, Morgane, Lenz, Jamila, Mion, François, Roman, Sabine |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14467 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Compared to Chicago Classification Version 3.0
por: Kurin, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders by Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0
por: Noh, Jin Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Chicago Classification Version 4.0 and the Difference From Version 3.0 in Diagnosing Esophageal Motility Disorders?
por: Lee, Ju Yup
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparing Patients Diagnosed With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by the Chicago Classification Version 3.0 and Version 4.0 Criteria
por: Tuan, Alyssa W., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Chicago classification v4.0 protocol improves specificity and accuracy of diagnosis of oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction
por: Visaggi, Pierfrancesco, et al.
Publicado: (2022)