Cargando…

What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects

Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because monitoring is costly, requires long‐term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables that are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Christopher Stuart, Thomas, Freya Mary, Michael, Damian Richard, Fraser, Hannah, Gould, Elliot, Begley, Jim, Wilson, Jenny, Vesk, Peter Anton, Rumpff, Libby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728
_version_ 1785020487922876416
author Jones, Christopher Stuart
Thomas, Freya Mary
Michael, Damian Richard
Fraser, Hannah
Gould, Elliot
Begley, Jim
Wilson, Jenny
Vesk, Peter Anton
Rumpff, Libby
author_facet Jones, Christopher Stuart
Thomas, Freya Mary
Michael, Damian Richard
Fraser, Hannah
Gould, Elliot
Begley, Jim
Wilson, Jenny
Vesk, Peter Anton
Rumpff, Libby
author_sort Jones, Christopher Stuart
collection PubMed
description Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because monitoring is costly, requires long‐term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables that are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitoring programs that focus on a reduced set of variables that are tied to specific restoration objectives. In this paper, we present a method to progress the development of a targeted monitoring program, using a pre‐existing state‐and‐transition model. We (1) use field data to validate an expert‐derived classification of woodland vegetation states; (2) use these data to identify which variable(s) help differentiate woodland states; and (3) identify the target threshold (for the variable) that signifies if the desired transition has been achieved. The measured vegetation variables from each site in this study were good predictors of the different states. We show that by measuring only a few of these variables, it is possible to assign the vegetation state for a collection of sites, and monitor if and when a transition to another state has occurred. For this ecosystem and state‐and‐transition models, out of nine vegetation variables considered, the density of immature trees and percentage of exotic understory vegetation cover were the variables most frequently specified as effective to define a threshold or transition. We synthesize findings by presenting a decision tree that provides practical guidance for the development of targeted monitoring strategies for woodland vegetation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100783012023-04-07 What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects Jones, Christopher Stuart Thomas, Freya Mary Michael, Damian Richard Fraser, Hannah Gould, Elliot Begley, Jim Wilson, Jenny Vesk, Peter Anton Rumpff, Libby Ecol Appl Article Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because monitoring is costly, requires long‐term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables that are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitoring programs that focus on a reduced set of variables that are tied to specific restoration objectives. In this paper, we present a method to progress the development of a targeted monitoring program, using a pre‐existing state‐and‐transition model. We (1) use field data to validate an expert‐derived classification of woodland vegetation states; (2) use these data to identify which variable(s) help differentiate woodland states; and (3) identify the target threshold (for the variable) that signifies if the desired transition has been achieved. The measured vegetation variables from each site in this study were good predictors of the different states. We show that by measuring only a few of these variables, it is possible to assign the vegetation state for a collection of sites, and monitor if and when a transition to another state has occurred. For this ecosystem and state‐and‐transition models, out of nine vegetation variables considered, the density of immature trees and percentage of exotic understory vegetation cover were the variables most frequently specified as effective to define a threshold or transition. We synthesize findings by presenting a decision tree that provides practical guidance for the development of targeted monitoring strategies for woodland vegetation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-10 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078301/ /pubmed/36053922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Article
Jones, Christopher Stuart
Thomas, Freya Mary
Michael, Damian Richard
Fraser, Hannah
Gould, Elliot
Begley, Jim
Wilson, Jenny
Vesk, Peter Anton
Rumpff, Libby
What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
title What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
title_full What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
title_fullStr What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
title_full_unstemmed What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
title_short What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
title_sort what state of the world are we in? targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728
work_keys_str_mv AT joneschristopherstuart whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT thomasfreyamary whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT michaeldamianrichard whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT fraserhannah whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT gouldelliot whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT begleyjim whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT wilsonjenny whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT veskpeteranton whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects
AT rumpfflibby whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects