Cargando…
What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects
Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because monitoring is costly, requires long‐term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables that are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitori...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728 |
_version_ | 1785020487922876416 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Christopher Stuart Thomas, Freya Mary Michael, Damian Richard Fraser, Hannah Gould, Elliot Begley, Jim Wilson, Jenny Vesk, Peter Anton Rumpff, Libby |
author_facet | Jones, Christopher Stuart Thomas, Freya Mary Michael, Damian Richard Fraser, Hannah Gould, Elliot Begley, Jim Wilson, Jenny Vesk, Peter Anton Rumpff, Libby |
author_sort | Jones, Christopher Stuart |
collection | PubMed |
description | Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because monitoring is costly, requires long‐term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables that are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitoring programs that focus on a reduced set of variables that are tied to specific restoration objectives. In this paper, we present a method to progress the development of a targeted monitoring program, using a pre‐existing state‐and‐transition model. We (1) use field data to validate an expert‐derived classification of woodland vegetation states; (2) use these data to identify which variable(s) help differentiate woodland states; and (3) identify the target threshold (for the variable) that signifies if the desired transition has been achieved. The measured vegetation variables from each site in this study were good predictors of the different states. We show that by measuring only a few of these variables, it is possible to assign the vegetation state for a collection of sites, and monitor if and when a transition to another state has occurred. For this ecosystem and state‐and‐transition models, out of nine vegetation variables considered, the density of immature trees and percentage of exotic understory vegetation cover were the variables most frequently specified as effective to define a threshold or transition. We synthesize findings by presenting a decision tree that provides practical guidance for the development of targeted monitoring strategies for woodland vegetation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100783012023-04-07 What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects Jones, Christopher Stuart Thomas, Freya Mary Michael, Damian Richard Fraser, Hannah Gould, Elliot Begley, Jim Wilson, Jenny Vesk, Peter Anton Rumpff, Libby Ecol Appl Article Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because monitoring is costly, requires long‐term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables that are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitoring programs that focus on a reduced set of variables that are tied to specific restoration objectives. In this paper, we present a method to progress the development of a targeted monitoring program, using a pre‐existing state‐and‐transition model. We (1) use field data to validate an expert‐derived classification of woodland vegetation states; (2) use these data to identify which variable(s) help differentiate woodland states; and (3) identify the target threshold (for the variable) that signifies if the desired transition has been achieved. The measured vegetation variables from each site in this study were good predictors of the different states. We show that by measuring only a few of these variables, it is possible to assign the vegetation state for a collection of sites, and monitor if and when a transition to another state has occurred. For this ecosystem and state‐and‐transition models, out of nine vegetation variables considered, the density of immature trees and percentage of exotic understory vegetation cover were the variables most frequently specified as effective to define a threshold or transition. We synthesize findings by presenting a decision tree that provides practical guidance for the development of targeted monitoring strategies for woodland vegetation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-10 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078301/ /pubmed/36053922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Article Jones, Christopher Stuart Thomas, Freya Mary Michael, Damian Richard Fraser, Hannah Gould, Elliot Begley, Jim Wilson, Jenny Vesk, Peter Anton Rumpff, Libby What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
title | What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
title_full | What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
title_fullStr | What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
title_full_unstemmed | What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
title_short | What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
title_sort | what state of the world are we in? targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneschristopherstuart whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT thomasfreyamary whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT michaeldamianrichard whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT fraserhannah whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT gouldelliot whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT begleyjim whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT wilsonjenny whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT veskpeteranton whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects AT rumpfflibby whatstateoftheworldareweintargetedmonitoringtodetecttransitionsinvegetationrestorationprojects |