Cargando…
Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance
Recently, numerous studies have revealed 4–12 Hz fluctuations of behavioral performance in a multitude of tasks. The majority has utilized stimuli near detection threshold and observed related fluctuations in hit‐rates, attributing these to perceptual or attentional processes. As neural oscillations...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36040756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14172 |
_version_ | 1785020490023174144 |
---|---|
author | Pomper, Ulrich Ansorge, Ulrich |
author_facet | Pomper, Ulrich Ansorge, Ulrich |
author_sort | Pomper, Ulrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, numerous studies have revealed 4–12 Hz fluctuations of behavioral performance in a multitude of tasks. The majority has utilized stimuli near detection threshold and observed related fluctuations in hit‐rates, attributing these to perceptual or attentional processes. As neural oscillations in the 8–20 Hz range also feature prominently in cortical motor areas, they might cause fluctuations in the ability to induce responses, independent of attentional capabilities. Additionally, different effectors (e.g., the left versus right hand) might be cyclically prioritized in an alternating fashion, similar to the attentional sampling of distinct locations, objects, or memory templates. Here, we investigated these questions via a behavioral dense‐sampling approach. Twenty‐six participants performed a simple visual discrimination task using highly salient stimuli. We varied the interval between each motor response and the subsequent target from 330 to 1040 ms, and analyzed performance as a function of this interval. Our data show significant fluctuations of both RTs and sensitivity between 12.5 and 25 Hz, but no evidence for an alternating prioritization of left‐ versus right‐hand responses. While our results suggest an impact of motor‐related signals on performance oscillations, they might additionally be influenced by perceptual processes earlier in the processing hierarchy. In summary, we demonstrate that behavioral oscillations generalize to situations involving highly salient stimuli, closer to everyday life. Moreover, our work adds to the literature by showing fluctuations at a high speed, which might be a consequence of both low task difficulty and the involvement of sensorimotor rhythms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100783112023-04-07 Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance Pomper, Ulrich Ansorge, Ulrich Psychophysiology Original Articles Recently, numerous studies have revealed 4–12 Hz fluctuations of behavioral performance in a multitude of tasks. The majority has utilized stimuli near detection threshold and observed related fluctuations in hit‐rates, attributing these to perceptual or attentional processes. As neural oscillations in the 8–20 Hz range also feature prominently in cortical motor areas, they might cause fluctuations in the ability to induce responses, independent of attentional capabilities. Additionally, different effectors (e.g., the left versus right hand) might be cyclically prioritized in an alternating fashion, similar to the attentional sampling of distinct locations, objects, or memory templates. Here, we investigated these questions via a behavioral dense‐sampling approach. Twenty‐six participants performed a simple visual discrimination task using highly salient stimuli. We varied the interval between each motor response and the subsequent target from 330 to 1040 ms, and analyzed performance as a function of this interval. Our data show significant fluctuations of both RTs and sensitivity between 12.5 and 25 Hz, but no evidence for an alternating prioritization of left‐ versus right‐hand responses. While our results suggest an impact of motor‐related signals on performance oscillations, they might additionally be influenced by perceptual processes earlier in the processing hierarchy. In summary, we demonstrate that behavioral oscillations generalize to situations involving highly salient stimuli, closer to everyday life. Moreover, our work adds to the literature by showing fluctuations at a high speed, which might be a consequence of both low task difficulty and the involvement of sensorimotor rhythms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-30 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10078311/ /pubmed/36040756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14172 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pomper, Ulrich Ansorge, Ulrich Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
title | Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
title_full | Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
title_fullStr | Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
title_short | Motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
title_sort | motor‐induced oscillations in choice response performance |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36040756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pomperulrich motorinducedoscillationsinchoiceresponseperformance AT ansorgeulrich motorinducedoscillationsinchoiceresponseperformance |