Cargando…
Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Positive touch experiences have proved to be extremely important throughout our lifespan, with cascading effects on our social life. However, few questionnaires are available to measure attitudes and experiences of touch in the Portuguese population. This study aimed to translate and val...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033723 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14960 |
_version_ | 1785020524648202240 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Ana Rita Antunes, Joana Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis González-Villar, Alberto J. Sampaio, Adriana |
author_facet | Pereira, Ana Rita Antunes, Joana Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis González-Villar, Alberto J. Sampaio, Adriana |
author_sort | Pereira, Ana Rita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positive touch experiences have proved to be extremely important throughout our lifespan, with cascading effects on our social life. However, few questionnaires are available to measure attitudes and experiences of touch in the Portuguese population. This study aimed to translate and validate the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ), as a reliable and valid instrument to measure different aspects of affective touch experiences and attitudes. METHODS: Therefore, an online sample of 384 (299 females and 85 males) participants, aged between 18 and 75 years (M = 24.59; SD = 9.56) was collected. Multidimensional Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out, and also reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were determined. In addition, we examined sex differences in attitudes and experiences of touch. RESULTS: Results showed good fit indexes for the 52-item six-factor model structure (friends and family touch, current intimate touch, childhood touch, attitudes to self-care, attitudes to intimate touch, and attitudes to unfamiliar touch). This instrument also showed good reliability and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. Significant sex differences were found, with female participants reporting more positive touch experiences (including childhood touch, friends and family touch, and current intimate touch) and a more favourable attitude to self-care, with males showing a more positive attitude towards unfamiliar touch. Regarding attitudes towards the intimate touch, scores for both groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Overall, the European Portuguese version of the TEAQ presented good psychometric properties and appears to be a reliable and valid self-report measure, being a useful and beneficial instrument in research and clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100784612023-04-07 Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire Pereira, Ana Rita Antunes, Joana Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis González-Villar, Alberto J. Sampaio, Adriana PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology BACKGROUND: Positive touch experiences have proved to be extremely important throughout our lifespan, with cascading effects on our social life. However, few questionnaires are available to measure attitudes and experiences of touch in the Portuguese population. This study aimed to translate and validate the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ), as a reliable and valid instrument to measure different aspects of affective touch experiences and attitudes. METHODS: Therefore, an online sample of 384 (299 females and 85 males) participants, aged between 18 and 75 years (M = 24.59; SD = 9.56) was collected. Multidimensional Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out, and also reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were determined. In addition, we examined sex differences in attitudes and experiences of touch. RESULTS: Results showed good fit indexes for the 52-item six-factor model structure (friends and family touch, current intimate touch, childhood touch, attitudes to self-care, attitudes to intimate touch, and attitudes to unfamiliar touch). This instrument also showed good reliability and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. Significant sex differences were found, with female participants reporting more positive touch experiences (including childhood touch, friends and family touch, and current intimate touch) and a more favourable attitude to self-care, with males showing a more positive attitude towards unfamiliar touch. Regarding attitudes towards the intimate touch, scores for both groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Overall, the European Portuguese version of the TEAQ presented good psychometric properties and appears to be a reliable and valid self-report measure, being a useful and beneficial instrument in research and clinical settings. PeerJ Inc. 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10078461/ /pubmed/37033723 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14960 Text en ©2023 Pereira et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry and Psychology Pereira, Ana Rita Antunes, Joana Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis González-Villar, Alberto J. Sampaio, Adriana Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire |
title | Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire |
title_full | Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire |
title_short | Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire |
title_sort | translation, validity, and reliability of the european portuguese version of the touch experiences and attitudes questionnaire |
topic | Psychiatry and Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033723 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraanarita translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire AT antunesjoana translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire AT trotterpaulad translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire AT mcglonefrancis translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire AT gonzalezvillaralbertoj translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire AT sampaioadriana translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire |