Cargando…

Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Positive touch experiences have proved to be extremely important throughout our lifespan, with cascading effects on our social life. However, few questionnaires are available to measure attitudes and experiences of touch in the Portuguese population. This study aimed to translate and val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Ana Rita, Antunes, Joana, Trotter, Paula D., McGlone, Francis, González-Villar, Alberto J., Sampaio, Adriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033723
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14960
_version_ 1785020524648202240
author Pereira, Ana Rita
Antunes, Joana
Trotter, Paula D.
McGlone, Francis
González-Villar, Alberto J.
Sampaio, Adriana
author_facet Pereira, Ana Rita
Antunes, Joana
Trotter, Paula D.
McGlone, Francis
González-Villar, Alberto J.
Sampaio, Adriana
author_sort Pereira, Ana Rita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive touch experiences have proved to be extremely important throughout our lifespan, with cascading effects on our social life. However, few questionnaires are available to measure attitudes and experiences of touch in the Portuguese population. This study aimed to translate and validate the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ), as a reliable and valid instrument to measure different aspects of affective touch experiences and attitudes. METHODS: Therefore, an online sample of 384 (299 females and 85 males) participants, aged between 18 and 75 years (M = 24.59; SD = 9.56) was collected. Multidimensional Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out, and also reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were determined. In addition, we examined sex differences in attitudes and experiences of touch. RESULTS: Results showed good fit indexes for the 52-item six-factor model structure (friends and family touch, current intimate touch, childhood touch, attitudes to self-care, attitudes to intimate touch, and attitudes to unfamiliar touch). This instrument also showed good reliability and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. Significant sex differences were found, with female participants reporting more positive touch experiences (including childhood touch, friends and family touch, and current intimate touch) and a more favourable attitude to self-care, with males showing a more positive attitude towards unfamiliar touch. Regarding attitudes towards the intimate touch, scores for both groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Overall, the European Portuguese version of the TEAQ presented good psychometric properties and appears to be a reliable and valid self-report measure, being a useful and beneficial instrument in research and clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100784612023-04-07 Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire Pereira, Ana Rita Antunes, Joana Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis González-Villar, Alberto J. Sampaio, Adriana PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology BACKGROUND: Positive touch experiences have proved to be extremely important throughout our lifespan, with cascading effects on our social life. However, few questionnaires are available to measure attitudes and experiences of touch in the Portuguese population. This study aimed to translate and validate the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ), as a reliable and valid instrument to measure different aspects of affective touch experiences and attitudes. METHODS: Therefore, an online sample of 384 (299 females and 85 males) participants, aged between 18 and 75 years (M = 24.59; SD = 9.56) was collected. Multidimensional Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out, and also reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were determined. In addition, we examined sex differences in attitudes and experiences of touch. RESULTS: Results showed good fit indexes for the 52-item six-factor model structure (friends and family touch, current intimate touch, childhood touch, attitudes to self-care, attitudes to intimate touch, and attitudes to unfamiliar touch). This instrument also showed good reliability and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. Significant sex differences were found, with female participants reporting more positive touch experiences (including childhood touch, friends and family touch, and current intimate touch) and a more favourable attitude to self-care, with males showing a more positive attitude towards unfamiliar touch. Regarding attitudes towards the intimate touch, scores for both groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Overall, the European Portuguese version of the TEAQ presented good psychometric properties and appears to be a reliable and valid self-report measure, being a useful and beneficial instrument in research and clinical settings. PeerJ Inc. 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10078461/ /pubmed/37033723 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14960 Text en ©2023 Pereira et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Psychology
Pereira, Ana Rita
Antunes, Joana
Trotter, Paula D.
McGlone, Francis
González-Villar, Alberto J.
Sampaio, Adriana
Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
title Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
title_full Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
title_fullStr Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
title_short Translation, validity, and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire
title_sort translation, validity, and reliability of the european portuguese version of the touch experiences and attitudes questionnaire
topic Psychiatry and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033723
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14960
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiraanarita translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire
AT antunesjoana translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire
AT trotterpaulad translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire
AT mcglonefrancis translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire
AT gonzalezvillaralbertoj translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire
AT sampaioadriana translationvalidityandreliabilityoftheeuropeanportugueseversionofthetouchexperiencesandattitudesquestionnaire