Cargando…

Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future

Human fungal pathogens cause a broad plethora of infections, spanning cutaneous dermatophytoses to invasive infections in immunocompromised hosts. As eukaryotic pathogens are capable of morphotype switching, they present unique challenges both for drug development and the immunological response. Whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Armstrong‐James, Darius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36403106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12960
_version_ 1785020539766571008
author Armstrong‐James, Darius
author_facet Armstrong‐James, Darius
author_sort Armstrong‐James, Darius
collection PubMed
description Human fungal pathogens cause a broad plethora of infections, spanning cutaneous dermatophytoses to invasive infections in immunocompromised hosts. As eukaryotic pathogens are capable of morphotype switching, they present unique challenges both for drug development and the immunological response. Whilst current antifungal therapies are limited to the orally available triazoles, intravenous echonocandins and polyenes, and flucytosine and terbinafine, there has been recent significant progress in the antifungal armamentorium with ibrexafungerp, a novel orally available terpanoid that inhibits 1,3‐beta‐D‐glucan‐approved by Food and Drug Administration in 2021, and fosmanogepix, an orally available pro‐drug of manogepix, which targets glycosylphosphatidylinositol‐anchored protein maturation entering Phase 3 studies for candidaemia. A number of further candidates are in development. There has been significant use of existing immunotherapies such as recombinant interferon‐γ and G‐CSF for fungal disease in immunocompromised patients, and there are emerging opportunities for monoclonal antibodies targeting TH2 inflammation. Omalizumab, an anti‐IgE monoclonal antibody in asthma, is now used routinely for the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, and further agents targeting IL‐4 and IL‐5 are being evaluated. In addition, T‐cell CAR therapy is showing early promise for fungal disease. Thus, we are likely to see rapid advances to our approach to the management of fungal disease in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100785272023-04-07 Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future Armstrong‐James, Darius Parasite Immunol Invited Reviews Human fungal pathogens cause a broad plethora of infections, spanning cutaneous dermatophytoses to invasive infections in immunocompromised hosts. As eukaryotic pathogens are capable of morphotype switching, they present unique challenges both for drug development and the immunological response. Whilst current antifungal therapies are limited to the orally available triazoles, intravenous echonocandins and polyenes, and flucytosine and terbinafine, there has been recent significant progress in the antifungal armamentorium with ibrexafungerp, a novel orally available terpanoid that inhibits 1,3‐beta‐D‐glucan‐approved by Food and Drug Administration in 2021, and fosmanogepix, an orally available pro‐drug of manogepix, which targets glycosylphosphatidylinositol‐anchored protein maturation entering Phase 3 studies for candidaemia. A number of further candidates are in development. There has been significant use of existing immunotherapies such as recombinant interferon‐γ and G‐CSF for fungal disease in immunocompromised patients, and there are emerging opportunities for monoclonal antibodies targeting TH2 inflammation. Omalizumab, an anti‐IgE monoclonal antibody in asthma, is now used routinely for the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, and further agents targeting IL‐4 and IL‐5 are being evaluated. In addition, T‐cell CAR therapy is showing early promise for fungal disease. Thus, we are likely to see rapid advances to our approach to the management of fungal disease in the near future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-18 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10078527/ /pubmed/36403106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12960 Text en © 2022 The Author. Parasite Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Reviews
Armstrong‐James, Darius
Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
title Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
title_full Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
title_fullStr Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
title_full_unstemmed Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
title_short Antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
title_sort antifungal chemotherapies and immunotherapies for the future
topic Invited Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36403106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12960
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongjamesdarius antifungalchemotherapiesandimmunotherapiesforthefuture