Cargando…
Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.2386 |
_version_ | 1785020552667201536 |
---|---|
author | Leung, Jovita T. Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca Ahmed, Saz P. Foulkes, Lucy Griffin, Cait Sakhardande, Ashok Bennett, Marc Dunning, Darren L. Griffiths, Kirsty Parker, Jenna Kuyken, Willem Williams, J. Mark G. Dalgleish, Tim Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne |
author_facet | Leung, Jovita T. Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca Ahmed, Saz P. Foulkes, Lucy Griffin, Cait Sakhardande, Ashok Bennett, Marc Dunning, Darren L. Griffiths, Kirsty Parker, Jenna Kuyken, Willem Williams, J. Mark G. Dalgleish, Tim Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne |
author_sort | Leung, Jovita T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training (compared with an active control) on self‐reported prosocial and antisocial tendencies and susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. 465 adolescents aged 11–16 years were randomly allocated to one of two training programmes. Pre‐ and post‐training, participants completed a social influence task. Self‐reported likelihood of engaging in prosocial and antisocial behaviours did not change post‐training, and regardless of training group, participants showed a higher propensity for prosocial influence than for antisocial influence. Finally, participants were less influenced by antisocial ratings following both training programmes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100785822023-04-07 Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training Leung, Jovita T. Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca Ahmed, Saz P. Foulkes, Lucy Griffin, Cait Sakhardande, Ashok Bennett, Marc Dunning, Darren L. Griffiths, Kirsty Parker, Jenna Kuyken, Willem Williams, J. Mark G. Dalgleish, Tim Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne Infant Child Dev Reports Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training (compared with an active control) on self‐reported prosocial and antisocial tendencies and susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. 465 adolescents aged 11–16 years were randomly allocated to one of two training programmes. Pre‐ and post‐training, participants completed a social influence task. Self‐reported likelihood of engaging in prosocial and antisocial behaviours did not change post‐training, and regardless of training group, participants showed a higher propensity for prosocial influence than for antisocial influence. Finally, participants were less influenced by antisocial ratings following both training programmes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10078582/ /pubmed/37035539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.2386 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Infant and Child Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reports Leung, Jovita T. Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca Ahmed, Saz P. Foulkes, Lucy Griffin, Cait Sakhardande, Ashok Bennett, Marc Dunning, Darren L. Griffiths, Kirsty Parker, Jenna Kuyken, Willem Williams, J. Mark G. Dalgleish, Tim Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
title | Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
title_full | Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
title_fullStr | Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
title_full_unstemmed | Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
title_short | Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
title_sort | susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training |
topic | Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.2386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leungjovitat susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT pierapisunyerblanca susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT ahmedsazp susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT foulkeslucy susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT griffincait susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT sakhardandeashok susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT bennettmarc susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT dunningdarrenl susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT griffithskirsty susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT parkerjenna susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT kuykenwillem susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT williamsjmarkg susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT dalgleishtim susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining AT blakemoresarahjayne susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining |