Cargando…

Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training

Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, Jovita T., Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca, Ahmed, Saz P., Foulkes, Lucy, Griffin, Cait, Sakhardande, Ashok, Bennett, Marc, Dunning, Darren L., Griffiths, Kirsty, Parker, Jenna, Kuyken, Willem, Williams, J. Mark G., Dalgleish, Tim, Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.2386
_version_ 1785020552667201536
author Leung, Jovita T.
Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca
Ahmed, Saz P.
Foulkes, Lucy
Griffin, Cait
Sakhardande, Ashok
Bennett, Marc
Dunning, Darren L.
Griffiths, Kirsty
Parker, Jenna
Kuyken, Willem
Williams, J. Mark G.
Dalgleish, Tim
Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
author_facet Leung, Jovita T.
Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca
Ahmed, Saz P.
Foulkes, Lucy
Griffin, Cait
Sakhardande, Ashok
Bennett, Marc
Dunning, Darren L.
Griffiths, Kirsty
Parker, Jenna
Kuyken, Willem
Williams, J. Mark G.
Dalgleish, Tim
Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
author_sort Leung, Jovita T.
collection PubMed
description Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training (compared with an active control) on self‐reported prosocial and antisocial tendencies and susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. 465 adolescents aged 11–16 years were randomly allocated to one of two training programmes. Pre‐ and post‐training, participants completed a social influence task. Self‐reported likelihood of engaging in prosocial and antisocial behaviours did not change post‐training, and regardless of training group, participants showed a higher propensity for prosocial influence than for antisocial influence. Finally, participants were less influenced by antisocial ratings following both training programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100785822023-04-07 Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training Leung, Jovita T. Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca Ahmed, Saz P. Foulkes, Lucy Griffin, Cait Sakhardande, Ashok Bennett, Marc Dunning, Darren L. Griffiths, Kirsty Parker, Jenna Kuyken, Willem Williams, J. Mark G. Dalgleish, Tim Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne Infant Child Dev Reports Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training (compared with an active control) on self‐reported prosocial and antisocial tendencies and susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. 465 adolescents aged 11–16 years were randomly allocated to one of two training programmes. Pre‐ and post‐training, participants completed a social influence task. Self‐reported likelihood of engaging in prosocial and antisocial behaviours did not change post‐training, and regardless of training group, participants showed a higher propensity for prosocial influence than for antisocial influence. Finally, participants were less influenced by antisocial ratings following both training programmes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10078582/ /pubmed/37035539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.2386 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Infant and Child Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reports
Leung, Jovita T.
Piera Pi‐Sunyer, Blanca
Ahmed, Saz P.
Foulkes, Lucy
Griffin, Cait
Sakhardande, Ashok
Bennett, Marc
Dunning, Darren L.
Griffiths, Kirsty
Parker, Jenna
Kuyken, Willem
Williams, J. Mark G.
Dalgleish, Tim
Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
title Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
title_full Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
title_fullStr Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
title_full_unstemmed Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
title_short Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
title_sort susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training
topic Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.2386
work_keys_str_mv AT leungjovitat susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT pierapisunyerblanca susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT ahmedsazp susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT foulkeslucy susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT griffincait susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT sakhardandeashok susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT bennettmarc susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT dunningdarrenl susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT griffithskirsty susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT parkerjenna susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT kuykenwillem susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT williamsjmarkg susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT dalgleishtim susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining
AT blakemoresarahjayne susceptibilitytoprosocialandantisocialinfluenceinadolescencefollowingmindfulnesstraining