Cargando…
A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data
Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) is now routinely used for estimating abundance and density of wildlife populations. A standard SCR model includes sub‐models for the distribution of individual activity centers (ACs) and for individual detections conditional on the locations of these ACs. Both sub‐mod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3887 |
_version_ | 1785020554873405440 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Wei Chipperfield, Joseph D. Illian, Janine B. Dupont, Pierre Milleret, Cyril de Valpine, Perry Bischof, Richard |
author_facet | Zhang, Wei Chipperfield, Joseph D. Illian, Janine B. Dupont, Pierre Milleret, Cyril de Valpine, Perry Bischof, Richard |
author_sort | Zhang, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) is now routinely used for estimating abundance and density of wildlife populations. A standard SCR model includes sub‐models for the distribution of individual activity centers (ACs) and for individual detections conditional on the locations of these ACs. Both sub‐models can be expressed as point processes taking place in continuous space, but there is a lack of accessible and efficient tools to fit such models in a Bayesian paradigm. Here, we describe a set of custom functions and distributions to achieve this. Our work allows for more efficient model fitting with spatial covariates on population density, offers the option to fit SCR models using the semi‐complete data likelihood (SCDL) approach instead of data augmentation, and better reflects the spatially continuous detection process in SCR studies that use area searches. In addition, the SCDL approach is more efficient than data augmentation for simple SCR models while losing its advantages for more complicated models that account for spatial variation in either population density or detection. We present the model formulation, test it with simulations, quantify computational efficiency gains, and conclude with a real‐life example using non‐invasive genetic sampling data for an elusive large carnivore, the wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Norway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100785922023-04-07 A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data Zhang, Wei Chipperfield, Joseph D. Illian, Janine B. Dupont, Pierre Milleret, Cyril de Valpine, Perry Bischof, Richard Ecology Statistical Report Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) is now routinely used for estimating abundance and density of wildlife populations. A standard SCR model includes sub‐models for the distribution of individual activity centers (ACs) and for individual detections conditional on the locations of these ACs. Both sub‐models can be expressed as point processes taking place in continuous space, but there is a lack of accessible and efficient tools to fit such models in a Bayesian paradigm. Here, we describe a set of custom functions and distributions to achieve this. Our work allows for more efficient model fitting with spatial covariates on population density, offers the option to fit SCR models using the semi‐complete data likelihood (SCDL) approach instead of data augmentation, and better reflects the spatially continuous detection process in SCR studies that use area searches. In addition, the SCDL approach is more efficient than data augmentation for simple SCR models while losing its advantages for more complicated models that account for spatial variation in either population density or detection. We present the model formulation, test it with simulations, quantify computational efficiency gains, and conclude with a real‐life example using non‐invasive genetic sampling data for an elusive large carnivore, the wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Norway. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-30 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078592/ /pubmed/36217822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3887 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Statistical Report Zhang, Wei Chipperfield, Joseph D. Illian, Janine B. Dupont, Pierre Milleret, Cyril de Valpine, Perry Bischof, Richard A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
title | A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
title_full | A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
title_fullStr | A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
title_full_unstemmed | A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
title_short | A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
title_sort | flexible and efficient bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture data |
topic | Statistical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3887 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangwei aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT chipperfieldjosephd aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT illianjanineb aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT dupontpierre aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT milleretcyril aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT devalpineperry aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT bischofrichard aflexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT zhangwei flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT chipperfieldjosephd flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT illianjanineb flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT dupontpierre flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT milleretcyril flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT devalpineperry flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata AT bischofrichard flexibleandefficientbayesianimplementationofpointprocessmodelsforspatialcapturerecapturedata |