Cargando…

‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH). BACKGROUND: Improving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bail, Kasia, Gibson, Diane, Hind, Alicia, Strickland, Karen, Paterson, Catherine, Merrick, Eamon, Gibson, Jo, Kozlovskaia, Maria, O’Dea, Amy, Smith, Bridget, Redley, Bernice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16285
_version_ 1785020566486384640
author Bail, Kasia
Gibson, Diane
Hind, Alicia
Strickland, Karen
Paterson, Catherine
Merrick, Eamon
Gibson, Jo
Kozlovskaia, Maria
O’Dea, Amy
Smith, Bridget
Redley, Bernice
author_facet Bail, Kasia
Gibson, Diane
Hind, Alicia
Strickland, Karen
Paterson, Catherine
Merrick, Eamon
Gibson, Jo
Kozlovskaia, Maria
O’Dea, Amy
Smith, Bridget
Redley, Bernice
author_sort Bail, Kasia
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH). BACKGROUND: Improving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governments. DESIGN: Participatory action research with mixed methods data collection was employed to evaluate a digital care management system implemented at a 169‐bed RACH. This paper reports qualitative findings of the 2‐year evaluation. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using focus groups with residents, visitors, nurses, managers, care workers, and consultants; resident/visitor and staff hallway interviews and responses to open‐ended questions in online staff surveys. Data were analysed thematically under the four predetermined study objectives. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines. RESULTS: 325 data captures from 88 participants, over seven data sources were coded. Findings indicate that the system was acceptable to both residents and staff due to perceptions of time‐saving and improved quality of care. Increased efficiency was perceived through timeliness as well as reduced time spent retrieving and documenting information. Quality of care was improved through care scheduling individualised to resident needs, with reminders to avoid missed care. Relatives were reassured and activities were scheduled to loved one's preferences. The co‐design implementation process was successful through commitment to quality from leadership teams and prioritising the focus on the holistic needs of the residents. CONCLUSION: A strong emphasis on co‐design with care staff in developing and implementing the digital care system contributed to a system that supported nursing and care work, facilitated reporting and documentation, and improved resident care and well‐being including identification of missed care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses, carers, administrators, and advocates can support the co‐design creation of information systems that suit the workflow of an organisation and keep the focus on individualised models of care provision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100786492023-04-07 ‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care Bail, Kasia Gibson, Diane Hind, Alicia Strickland, Karen Paterson, Catherine Merrick, Eamon Gibson, Jo Kozlovskaia, Maria O’Dea, Amy Smith, Bridget Redley, Bernice J Clin Nurs Original Articles AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH). BACKGROUND: Improving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governments. DESIGN: Participatory action research with mixed methods data collection was employed to evaluate a digital care management system implemented at a 169‐bed RACH. This paper reports qualitative findings of the 2‐year evaluation. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using focus groups with residents, visitors, nurses, managers, care workers, and consultants; resident/visitor and staff hallway interviews and responses to open‐ended questions in online staff surveys. Data were analysed thematically under the four predetermined study objectives. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines. RESULTS: 325 data captures from 88 participants, over seven data sources were coded. Findings indicate that the system was acceptable to both residents and staff due to perceptions of time‐saving and improved quality of care. Increased efficiency was perceived through timeliness as well as reduced time spent retrieving and documenting information. Quality of care was improved through care scheduling individualised to resident needs, with reminders to avoid missed care. Relatives were reassured and activities were scheduled to loved one's preferences. The co‐design implementation process was successful through commitment to quality from leadership teams and prioritising the focus on the holistic needs of the residents. CONCLUSION: A strong emphasis on co‐design with care staff in developing and implementing the digital care system contributed to a system that supported nursing and care work, facilitated reporting and documentation, and improved resident care and well‐being including identification of missed care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses, carers, administrators, and advocates can support the co‐design creation of information systems that suit the workflow of an organisation and keep the focus on individualised models of care provision. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-14 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078649/ /pubmed/35285557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16285 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bail, Kasia
Gibson, Diane
Hind, Alicia
Strickland, Karen
Paterson, Catherine
Merrick, Eamon
Gibson, Jo
Kozlovskaia, Maria
O’Dea, Amy
Smith, Bridget
Redley, Bernice
‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
title ‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
title_full ‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
title_fullStr ‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
title_full_unstemmed ‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
title_short ‘It enables the carers to see the person first’: Qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
title_sort ‘it enables the carers to see the person first’: qualitative evaluation of point‐of‐care digital management system in residential aged care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16285
work_keys_str_mv AT bailkasia itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT gibsondiane itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT hindalicia itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT stricklandkaren itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT patersoncatherine itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT merrickeamon itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT gibsonjo itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT kozlovskaiamaria itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT odeaamy itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT smithbridget itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare
AT redleybernice itenablesthecarerstoseethepersonfirstqualitativeevaluationofpointofcaredigitalmanagementsysteminresidentialagedcare