Cargando…

Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE: Metal sleeves are commonly used in implant guides for guided surgery. Cost and sleeve specification limit the applications. This in vitro study examined the differences in the implant position deviations produced by a digitally designed surgical guide with no metal sleeve in comparison to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, Coleman R., Ammoun, Rami, Deeb, George R., Bencharit, Sompop
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35257456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13503
_version_ 1785020568241700864
author Adams, Coleman R.
Ammoun, Rami
Deeb, George R.
Bencharit, Sompop
author_facet Adams, Coleman R.
Ammoun, Rami
Deeb, George R.
Bencharit, Sompop
author_sort Adams, Coleman R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Metal sleeves are commonly used in implant guides for guided surgery. Cost and sleeve specification limit the applications. This in vitro study examined the differences in the implant position deviations produced by a digitally designed surgical guide with no metal sleeve in comparison to a conventional one with a metal sleeve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experiment was conducted in two steps for each step: n = 20 casts total, 10 casts each group; Step 1 to examine one guide from each group with ten implant placements in a dental cast, and Step 2 to examine one guide to one cast. Implant placement was performed using a guided surgical protocol. Postoperative cone‐beam computed tomography images were made and were superimposed onto the treatment‐planning images. The implant horizontal and angulation deviations from the planned position were measured and analyzed using t‐test and F‐test (p = 0.05). RESULTS: For Step 1 and 2, respectively, implant deviations for the surgical guide with sleeve were –0.3 ±0.17 mm and 0.15 ±0.23 mm mesially, 0.60 ±1.69 mm, and –1.50 ±0.99 mm buccolingual at the apex, 0.20 ±0.47 mm and –0.60 ±0.27 mm buccolingual at the cervical, and 2.73° ±4.80° and –1.49° ±2.91° in the buccolingual angulation. For Step 1 and 2, respectively, the implant deviations for the surgical guide without sleeve were –0.17 ±0.14 mm and –0.06 ±0.07 mm mesially, 0.35 ±1.04 mm and –1.619 ±1.03 mm buccolingual at the apex, 0.10 ±0.27 mm and –0.62 ±0.27 mm buccolingual at the cervical, and 1.73° ±3.66° and –1.64° ±2.26° in the buccolingual angulation. No statistically significant differences were found in any group except for mesial deviation of the Step 2 group (F‐test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A digitally designed surgical guide with no metal sleeve demonstrates similar accuracy but higher precision compared to a surgical guide with a metal sleeve. Metal sleeves may not be required for guided surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100786592023-04-07 Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study Adams, Coleman R. Ammoun, Rami Deeb, George R. Bencharit, Sompop J Prosthodont Original Articles PURPOSE: Metal sleeves are commonly used in implant guides for guided surgery. Cost and sleeve specification limit the applications. This in vitro study examined the differences in the implant position deviations produced by a digitally designed surgical guide with no metal sleeve in comparison to a conventional one with a metal sleeve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experiment was conducted in two steps for each step: n = 20 casts total, 10 casts each group; Step 1 to examine one guide from each group with ten implant placements in a dental cast, and Step 2 to examine one guide to one cast. Implant placement was performed using a guided surgical protocol. Postoperative cone‐beam computed tomography images were made and were superimposed onto the treatment‐planning images. The implant horizontal and angulation deviations from the planned position were measured and analyzed using t‐test and F‐test (p = 0.05). RESULTS: For Step 1 and 2, respectively, implant deviations for the surgical guide with sleeve were –0.3 ±0.17 mm and 0.15 ±0.23 mm mesially, 0.60 ±1.69 mm, and –1.50 ±0.99 mm buccolingual at the apex, 0.20 ±0.47 mm and –0.60 ±0.27 mm buccolingual at the cervical, and 2.73° ±4.80° and –1.49° ±2.91° in the buccolingual angulation. For Step 1 and 2, respectively, the implant deviations for the surgical guide without sleeve were –0.17 ±0.14 mm and –0.06 ±0.07 mm mesially, 0.35 ±1.04 mm and –1.619 ±1.03 mm buccolingual at the apex, 0.10 ±0.27 mm and –0.62 ±0.27 mm buccolingual at the cervical, and 1.73° ±3.66° and –1.64° ±2.26° in the buccolingual angulation. No statistically significant differences were found in any group except for mesial deviation of the Step 2 group (F‐test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A digitally designed surgical guide with no metal sleeve demonstrates similar accuracy but higher precision compared to a surgical guide with a metal sleeve. Metal sleeves may not be required for guided surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-22 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078659/ /pubmed/35257456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13503 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Adams, Coleman R.
Ammoun, Rami
Deeb, George R.
Bencharit, Sompop
Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
title Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
title_full Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
title_short Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
title_sort influence of metal guide sleeves on the accuracy and precision of dental implant placement using guided implant surgery: an in vitro study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35257456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13503
work_keys_str_mv AT adamscolemanr influenceofmetalguidesleevesontheaccuracyandprecisionofdentalimplantplacementusingguidedimplantsurgeryaninvitrostudy
AT ammounrami influenceofmetalguidesleevesontheaccuracyandprecisionofdentalimplantplacementusingguidedimplantsurgeryaninvitrostudy
AT deebgeorger influenceofmetalguidesleevesontheaccuracyandprecisionofdentalimplantplacementusingguidedimplantsurgeryaninvitrostudy
AT bencharitsompop influenceofmetalguidesleevesontheaccuracyandprecisionofdentalimplantplacementusingguidedimplantsurgeryaninvitrostudy