Cargando…

Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists

OBJECTIVES: Response rates for mail surveys of dentists and other health care providers have declined appreciably over the past several decades. The objective of this study was to update evidence about the impact use of incentives and different mail strategies on response rates in a mail survey of d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKernan, Susan C., Reynolds, Julie C., McInroy, Brooke, Damiano, Peter C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12510
_version_ 1785020574467096576
author McKernan, Susan C.
Reynolds, Julie C.
McInroy, Brooke
Damiano, Peter C.
author_facet McKernan, Susan C.
Reynolds, Julie C.
McInroy, Brooke
Damiano, Peter C.
author_sort McKernan, Susan C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Response rates for mail surveys of dentists and other health care providers have declined appreciably over the past several decades. The objective of this study was to update evidence about the impact use of incentives and different mail strategies on response rates in a mail survey of dentists. METHODS: We randomized private practice dentists in Iowa (N = 1267) into six study groups to test the effects of incentives and mail strategy on response rate. Survey incentives included either a $2 bill or a customized pen/stylus; a control group with no incentive was included. Mail strategies included bulk mail or first‐class stamps. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 43%. A $2 bill incentive was associated with significantly higher likelihood of returning a survey compared to the control group with no incentive (48% response rate vs. 40%, respectively). A non‐monetary incentive was not significantly associated with likelihood of response. Use of first‐class stamps compared to bulk mail did not significantly affect response rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of a $2 incentive to increase response rate in a mail survey of dentists. Given the background trend of declining survey participation rates, researchers should consider use of monetary incentives and explore new strategies to increase participation among dentists and other health care providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100786852023-04-07 Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists McKernan, Susan C. Reynolds, Julie C. McInroy, Brooke Damiano, Peter C. J Public Health Dent Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Response rates for mail surveys of dentists and other health care providers have declined appreciably over the past several decades. The objective of this study was to update evidence about the impact use of incentives and different mail strategies on response rates in a mail survey of dentists. METHODS: We randomized private practice dentists in Iowa (N = 1267) into six study groups to test the effects of incentives and mail strategy on response rate. Survey incentives included either a $2 bill or a customized pen/stylus; a control group with no incentive was included. Mail strategies included bulk mail or first‐class stamps. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 43%. A $2 bill incentive was associated with significantly higher likelihood of returning a survey compared to the control group with no incentive (48% response rate vs. 40%, respectively). A non‐monetary incentive was not significantly associated with likelihood of response. Use of first‐class stamps compared to bulk mail did not significantly affect response rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of a $2 incentive to increase response rate in a mail survey of dentists. Given the background trend of declining survey participation rates, researchers should consider use of monetary incentives and explore new strategies to increase participation among dentists and other health care providers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-03-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC10078685/ /pubmed/35243631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12510 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Public Health Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Public Health Dentistry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
McKernan, Susan C.
Reynolds, Julie C.
McInroy, Brooke
Damiano, Peter C.
Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
title Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
title_full Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
title_fullStr Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
title_full_unstemmed Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
title_short Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
title_sort randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12510
work_keys_str_mv AT mckernansusanc randomizedexperimentontheeffectofincentivesandmailingstrategyonresponseratesinamailsurveyofdentists
AT reynoldsjuliec randomizedexperimentontheeffectofincentivesandmailingstrategyonresponseratesinamailsurveyofdentists
AT mcinroybrooke randomizedexperimentontheeffectofincentivesandmailingstrategyonresponseratesinamailsurveyofdentists
AT damianopeterc randomizedexperimentontheeffectofincentivesandmailingstrategyonresponseratesinamailsurveyofdentists